Cargando…

Supermarket Choice, Shopping Behavior, Socioeconomic Status, and Food Purchases

INTRODUCTION: Both SES and supermarket choice have been associated with diet quality. This study aimed to assess the contributions of supermarket choice and shopping behaviors to the healthfulness of purchases and social patterning in purchases. METHODS: Observational panel data on purchases of frui...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Pechey, Rachel, Monsivais, Pablo
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Elsevier Science 2015
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4651322/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26163172
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.amepre.2015.04.020
_version_ 1782401620892450816
author Pechey, Rachel
Monsivais, Pablo
author_facet Pechey, Rachel
Monsivais, Pablo
author_sort Pechey, Rachel
collection PubMed
description INTRODUCTION: Both SES and supermarket choice have been associated with diet quality. This study aimed to assess the contributions of supermarket choice and shopping behaviors to the healthfulness of purchases and social patterning in purchases. METHODS: Observational panel data on purchases of fruit and vegetables and less-healthy foods/beverages from 2010 were obtained for 24,879 households, stratified by occupational social class (analyzed in 2014). Households’ supermarket choice was determined by whether they ever visited market-defined high- or low-price supermarkets. Analyses also explored extent of use within supermarket choice groups. Shopping behaviors included trip frequency, trip size, and number of store chains visited. RESULTS: Households using low-price (and not high-price) supermarkets purchased significantly lower percentages of energy from fruit and vegetables and higher percentages of energy from less-healthy foods/beverages than households using high-price (and not low-price) supermarkets. When controlling for SES and shopping behaviors, the effect of supermarket choice was reduced but remained significant for both fruit and vegetables and less-healthy foods/beverages. The extent of use of low- or high-price supermarkets had limited effects on outcomes. More-frequent trips and fewer small trips were associated with healthier purchasing for both outcomes; visiting more store chains was associated with higher percentages of energy from fruit and vegetables. CONCLUSIONS: Although both supermarket choice and shopping behaviors are associated with healthfulness of purchases, neither appears to contribute to socioeconomic differences. Moreover, differences between supermarket environments may not be primary drivers of the relationship between supermarket choice and healthfulness of purchases.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4651322
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2015
publisher Elsevier Science
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-46513222015-12-09 Supermarket Choice, Shopping Behavior, Socioeconomic Status, and Food Purchases Pechey, Rachel Monsivais, Pablo Am J Prev Med Research Article INTRODUCTION: Both SES and supermarket choice have been associated with diet quality. This study aimed to assess the contributions of supermarket choice and shopping behaviors to the healthfulness of purchases and social patterning in purchases. METHODS: Observational panel data on purchases of fruit and vegetables and less-healthy foods/beverages from 2010 were obtained for 24,879 households, stratified by occupational social class (analyzed in 2014). Households’ supermarket choice was determined by whether they ever visited market-defined high- or low-price supermarkets. Analyses also explored extent of use within supermarket choice groups. Shopping behaviors included trip frequency, trip size, and number of store chains visited. RESULTS: Households using low-price (and not high-price) supermarkets purchased significantly lower percentages of energy from fruit and vegetables and higher percentages of energy from less-healthy foods/beverages than households using high-price (and not low-price) supermarkets. When controlling for SES and shopping behaviors, the effect of supermarket choice was reduced but remained significant for both fruit and vegetables and less-healthy foods/beverages. The extent of use of low- or high-price supermarkets had limited effects on outcomes. More-frequent trips and fewer small trips were associated with healthier purchasing for both outcomes; visiting more store chains was associated with higher percentages of energy from fruit and vegetables. CONCLUSIONS: Although both supermarket choice and shopping behaviors are associated with healthfulness of purchases, neither appears to contribute to socioeconomic differences. Moreover, differences between supermarket environments may not be primary drivers of the relationship between supermarket choice and healthfulness of purchases. Elsevier Science 2015-12 /pmc/articles/PMC4651322/ /pubmed/26163172 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.amepre.2015.04.020 Text en © 2015 Elsevier Inc. on behalf of American Journal of Preventive Medicine. All rights reserved. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open access article under the CC BY license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Research Article
Pechey, Rachel
Monsivais, Pablo
Supermarket Choice, Shopping Behavior, Socioeconomic Status, and Food Purchases
title Supermarket Choice, Shopping Behavior, Socioeconomic Status, and Food Purchases
title_full Supermarket Choice, Shopping Behavior, Socioeconomic Status, and Food Purchases
title_fullStr Supermarket Choice, Shopping Behavior, Socioeconomic Status, and Food Purchases
title_full_unstemmed Supermarket Choice, Shopping Behavior, Socioeconomic Status, and Food Purchases
title_short Supermarket Choice, Shopping Behavior, Socioeconomic Status, and Food Purchases
title_sort supermarket choice, shopping behavior, socioeconomic status, and food purchases
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4651322/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26163172
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.amepre.2015.04.020
work_keys_str_mv AT pecheyrachel supermarketchoiceshoppingbehaviorsocioeconomicstatusandfoodpurchases
AT monsivaispablo supermarketchoiceshoppingbehaviorsocioeconomicstatusandfoodpurchases