Cargando…
Survival Analysis of Faculty Retention and Promotion in the Social Sciences by Gender
BACKGROUND: Recruitment and retention of talent is central to the research performance of universities. Existing research shows that, while men are more likely than women to be promoted at the different stages of the academic career, no such difference is found when it comes to faculty retention rat...
Autores principales: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Public Library of Science
2015
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4651362/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26580565 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0143093 |
_version_ | 1782401629942710272 |
---|---|
author | Box-Steffensmeier, Janet M. Cunha, Raphael C. Varbanov, Roumen A. Hoh, Yee Shwen Knisley, Margaret L. Holmes, Mary Alice |
author_facet | Box-Steffensmeier, Janet M. Cunha, Raphael C. Varbanov, Roumen A. Hoh, Yee Shwen Knisley, Margaret L. Holmes, Mary Alice |
author_sort | Box-Steffensmeier, Janet M. |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Recruitment and retention of talent is central to the research performance of universities. Existing research shows that, while men are more likely than women to be promoted at the different stages of the academic career, no such difference is found when it comes to faculty retention rates. Current research on faculty retention, however, focuses on careers in science, technology, engineering, and mathematics (STEM). We extend this line of inquiry to the social sciences. METHODS: We follow 2,218 tenure-track assistant professors hired since 1990 in seven social science disciplines at nineteen U.S. universities from time of hire to time of departure. We also track their time to promotion to associate and full professor. Using survival analysis, we examine gender differences in time to departure and time to promotion. Our methods account for censoring and unobserved heterogeneity, as well as effect heterogeneity across disciplines and cohorts. RESULTS: We find no statistically significant differences between genders in faculty retention. However, we do find that men are more likely to be granted tenure than women. When it comes to promotion to full professor, the results are less conclusive, as the effect of gender is sensitive to model specification. CONCLUSIONS: The results corroborate previous findings about gender patterns in faculty retention and promotion. They suggest that advances have been made when it comes to gender equality in retention and promotion, but important differences still persist. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-4651362 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2015 |
publisher | Public Library of Science |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-46513622015-11-25 Survival Analysis of Faculty Retention and Promotion in the Social Sciences by Gender Box-Steffensmeier, Janet M. Cunha, Raphael C. Varbanov, Roumen A. Hoh, Yee Shwen Knisley, Margaret L. Holmes, Mary Alice PLoS One Research Article BACKGROUND: Recruitment and retention of talent is central to the research performance of universities. Existing research shows that, while men are more likely than women to be promoted at the different stages of the academic career, no such difference is found when it comes to faculty retention rates. Current research on faculty retention, however, focuses on careers in science, technology, engineering, and mathematics (STEM). We extend this line of inquiry to the social sciences. METHODS: We follow 2,218 tenure-track assistant professors hired since 1990 in seven social science disciplines at nineteen U.S. universities from time of hire to time of departure. We also track their time to promotion to associate and full professor. Using survival analysis, we examine gender differences in time to departure and time to promotion. Our methods account for censoring and unobserved heterogeneity, as well as effect heterogeneity across disciplines and cohorts. RESULTS: We find no statistically significant differences between genders in faculty retention. However, we do find that men are more likely to be granted tenure than women. When it comes to promotion to full professor, the results are less conclusive, as the effect of gender is sensitive to model specification. CONCLUSIONS: The results corroborate previous findings about gender patterns in faculty retention and promotion. They suggest that advances have been made when it comes to gender equality in retention and promotion, but important differences still persist. Public Library of Science 2015-11-18 /pmc/articles/PMC4651362/ /pubmed/26580565 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0143093 Text en © 2015 Box-Steffensmeier et al http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are properly credited. |
spellingShingle | Research Article Box-Steffensmeier, Janet M. Cunha, Raphael C. Varbanov, Roumen A. Hoh, Yee Shwen Knisley, Margaret L. Holmes, Mary Alice Survival Analysis of Faculty Retention and Promotion in the Social Sciences by Gender |
title | Survival Analysis of Faculty Retention and Promotion in the Social Sciences by Gender |
title_full | Survival Analysis of Faculty Retention and Promotion in the Social Sciences by Gender |
title_fullStr | Survival Analysis of Faculty Retention and Promotion in the Social Sciences by Gender |
title_full_unstemmed | Survival Analysis of Faculty Retention and Promotion in the Social Sciences by Gender |
title_short | Survival Analysis of Faculty Retention and Promotion in the Social Sciences by Gender |
title_sort | survival analysis of faculty retention and promotion in the social sciences by gender |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4651362/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26580565 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0143093 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT boxsteffensmeierjanetm survivalanalysisoffacultyretentionandpromotioninthesocialsciencesbygender AT cunharaphaelc survivalanalysisoffacultyretentionandpromotioninthesocialsciencesbygender AT varbanovroumena survivalanalysisoffacultyretentionandpromotioninthesocialsciencesbygender AT hohyeeshwen survivalanalysisoffacultyretentionandpromotioninthesocialsciencesbygender AT knisleymargaretl survivalanalysisoffacultyretentionandpromotioninthesocialsciencesbygender AT holmesmaryalice survivalanalysisoffacultyretentionandpromotioninthesocialsciencesbygender |