Cargando…

Yearly hypertension screening in women with a history of pre-eclampsia: a cost-effectiveness analysis

BACKGROUND: Women with a history of preeclampsia are at increased risk for future hypertension and cardiovascular disease (CVD); until now it is not clear whether preventive measures are needed. METHODS: A decision-analytic Markov model was constructed to evaluate healthcare costs and effects of scr...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Drost, J.T., Grutters, J.P.C., van der Wilt, G.-J., van der Schouw, Y.T., Maas, A.H.E.M.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Bohn Stafleu van Loghum 2015
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4651960/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26449244
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s12471-015-0760-z
Descripción
Sumario:BACKGROUND: Women with a history of preeclampsia are at increased risk for future hypertension and cardiovascular disease (CVD); until now it is not clear whether preventive measures are needed. METHODS: A decision-analytic Markov model was constructed to evaluate healthcare costs and effects of screening and treatment (100 % compliance) for hypertension post preeclampsia based on the available literature. Cardiovascular events and CVD mortality were defined as health states. Outcomes were measured in absolute costs, events, life-years and quality-adjusted life-years (QALYs). Sensitivity and threshold analyses were performed to address uncertainty. RESULTS: Over a 20-year time horizon, events occurred in 7.2 % of the population after screening, and in 8.5 % of the population without screening. QALYs increased from 16.37 (no screening strategy) to 16.40 (screening strategy), an increment of 0.03 (95 % CI 0.01;0.05) QALYs. Total expected costs were € 8016 in the screening strategy, and € 9087 in the none screening strategy (expected saving of € 1071 (95 % CI − 3146;-87) per person). CONCLUSION: Annual hypertension screening and treatment in women with a history of preeclampsia may save costs, for at least a similar quality of life and survival due to prevented CVD compared with standard care. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (doi:10.1007/s12471-015-0760-z) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.