Cargando…
Repeatability of in vivo quantification of atherosclerotic carotid artery plaque components by supervised multispectral classification
OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the agreement and scan–rescan repeatability of automated and manual plaque segmentation for the quantification of in vivo carotid artery plaque components from multi-contrast MRI. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Twenty-three patients with 30–70 % stenosis underwent two 3T MR carotid ve...
Autores principales: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Springer Berlin Heidelberg
2015
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4651977/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26162931 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10334-015-0495-2 |
Sumario: | OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the agreement and scan–rescan repeatability of automated and manual plaque segmentation for the quantification of in vivo carotid artery plaque components from multi-contrast MRI. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Twenty-three patients with 30–70 % stenosis underwent two 3T MR carotid vessel wall exams within a 1 month interval. T1w, T2w, PDw and TOF images were acquired around the region of maximum vessel narrowing. Manual delineation of the vessel wall and plaque components (lipid, calcification, loose matrix) by an experienced observer provided the reference standard for training and evaluation of an automated plaque classifier. Areas of different plaque components and fibrous tissue were quantified and compared between segmentation methods and scan sessions. RESULTS: In total, 304 slices from 23 patients were included in the segmentation experiment, in which 144 aligned slice pairs were available for repeatability analysis. The correlation between manual and automated segmented areas was 0.35 for lipid, 0.66 for calcification, 0.50 for loose matrix and 0.82 for fibrous tissue. For the comparison between scan sessions, the coefficient of repeatability of area measurement obtained by automated segmentation was lower than by manual delineation for lipid (9.9 vs. 17.1 mm(2)), loose matrix (13.8 vs. 21.2 mm(2)) and fibrous tissue (24.6 vs. 35.0 mm(2)), and was similar for calcification (20.0 vs. 17.6 mm(2)). CONCLUSION: Application of an automated classifier for segmentation of carotid vessel wall plaque components from in vivo MRI results in improved scan–rescan repeatability compared to manual analysis. |
---|