Cargando…
Body mass index and risk of lung cancer: Systematic review and dose-response meta-analysis
Questions remain about the significance of the dose-response relationship between body mass index (BMI) and lung cancer (LC) risk. Pertinent studies were identified through a search in EMBASE and PUBMED from July 2014 until March 2015. The summary relative risk (SRR) and confidence interval (CI) wer...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Nature Publishing Group
2015
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4652238/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26582414 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/srep16938 |
_version_ | 1782401713043406848 |
---|---|
author | Duan, Peng Hu, Chunhui Quan, Chao Yi, Xianfu Zhou, Wei Yuan, Meng Yu, Tingting Kourouma, Ansoumane Yang, Kedi |
author_facet | Duan, Peng Hu, Chunhui Quan, Chao Yi, Xianfu Zhou, Wei Yuan, Meng Yu, Tingting Kourouma, Ansoumane Yang, Kedi |
author_sort | Duan, Peng |
collection | PubMed |
description | Questions remain about the significance of the dose-response relationship between body mass index (BMI) and lung cancer (LC) risk. Pertinent studies were identified through a search in EMBASE and PUBMED from July 2014 until March 2015. The summary relative risk (SRR) and confidence interval (CI) were estimated. The dose-response relationship was assessed using a restricted cubic spline. The overall meta-analysis showed evidence of a nonlinear association between BMI and LC risk (P(nonlinearity) < 0.001). The SRR were 0.98 (95%CI: 0.95–1.01) for 25 kg/m(2), 0.91 (95%CI: 0.85–0.98) for 30 kg/m(2) and 0.81 (95% CI: 0.72–0.91) for 35 kg/m(2), with mild between-study heterogeneity (I(2) = 5%). The results of the stratified analysis by gender were comparable to those of the overall meta-analysis. When stratified by smoking status, linear dose-response associations were observed for current smokers, ex-smokers and non-smokers (P(nonlinearity) > 0.05), whereas the effects were attenuated when restricting analysis to non-smokers, and at the point of 30 kg/m(2), the SRR was 0.96 (95%CI: 0.86–1.07) for males and 0.95 (95%CI: 0.89–1.02) for females. This meta-analysis provides quantitative evidence that increasing BMI is a protective factor against LC. Keeping normal-to-moderate BMI should be prescribed as an evidence-based lifestyle tip for LC prevention in smokers. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-4652238 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2015 |
publisher | Nature Publishing Group |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-46522382015-11-24 Body mass index and risk of lung cancer: Systematic review and dose-response meta-analysis Duan, Peng Hu, Chunhui Quan, Chao Yi, Xianfu Zhou, Wei Yuan, Meng Yu, Tingting Kourouma, Ansoumane Yang, Kedi Sci Rep Article Questions remain about the significance of the dose-response relationship between body mass index (BMI) and lung cancer (LC) risk. Pertinent studies were identified through a search in EMBASE and PUBMED from July 2014 until March 2015. The summary relative risk (SRR) and confidence interval (CI) were estimated. The dose-response relationship was assessed using a restricted cubic spline. The overall meta-analysis showed evidence of a nonlinear association between BMI and LC risk (P(nonlinearity) < 0.001). The SRR were 0.98 (95%CI: 0.95–1.01) for 25 kg/m(2), 0.91 (95%CI: 0.85–0.98) for 30 kg/m(2) and 0.81 (95% CI: 0.72–0.91) for 35 kg/m(2), with mild between-study heterogeneity (I(2) = 5%). The results of the stratified analysis by gender were comparable to those of the overall meta-analysis. When stratified by smoking status, linear dose-response associations were observed for current smokers, ex-smokers and non-smokers (P(nonlinearity) > 0.05), whereas the effects were attenuated when restricting analysis to non-smokers, and at the point of 30 kg/m(2), the SRR was 0.96 (95%CI: 0.86–1.07) for males and 0.95 (95%CI: 0.89–1.02) for females. This meta-analysis provides quantitative evidence that increasing BMI is a protective factor against LC. Keeping normal-to-moderate BMI should be prescribed as an evidence-based lifestyle tip for LC prevention in smokers. Nature Publishing Group 2015-11-19 /pmc/articles/PMC4652238/ /pubmed/26582414 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/srep16938 Text en Copyright © 2015, Macmillan Publishers Limited http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in the credit line; if the material is not included under the Creative Commons license, users will need to obtain permission from the license holder to reproduce the material. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ |
spellingShingle | Article Duan, Peng Hu, Chunhui Quan, Chao Yi, Xianfu Zhou, Wei Yuan, Meng Yu, Tingting Kourouma, Ansoumane Yang, Kedi Body mass index and risk of lung cancer: Systematic review and dose-response meta-analysis |
title | Body mass index and risk of lung cancer: Systematic review and dose-response meta-analysis |
title_full | Body mass index and risk of lung cancer: Systematic review and dose-response meta-analysis |
title_fullStr | Body mass index and risk of lung cancer: Systematic review and dose-response meta-analysis |
title_full_unstemmed | Body mass index and risk of lung cancer: Systematic review and dose-response meta-analysis |
title_short | Body mass index and risk of lung cancer: Systematic review and dose-response meta-analysis |
title_sort | body mass index and risk of lung cancer: systematic review and dose-response meta-analysis |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4652238/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26582414 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/srep16938 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT duanpeng bodymassindexandriskoflungcancersystematicreviewanddoseresponsemetaanalysis AT huchunhui bodymassindexandriskoflungcancersystematicreviewanddoseresponsemetaanalysis AT quanchao bodymassindexandriskoflungcancersystematicreviewanddoseresponsemetaanalysis AT yixianfu bodymassindexandriskoflungcancersystematicreviewanddoseresponsemetaanalysis AT zhouwei bodymassindexandriskoflungcancersystematicreviewanddoseresponsemetaanalysis AT yuanmeng bodymassindexandriskoflungcancersystematicreviewanddoseresponsemetaanalysis AT yutingting bodymassindexandriskoflungcancersystematicreviewanddoseresponsemetaanalysis AT kouroumaansoumane bodymassindexandriskoflungcancersystematicreviewanddoseresponsemetaanalysis AT yangkedi bodymassindexandriskoflungcancersystematicreviewanddoseresponsemetaanalysis |