Cargando…

Body mass index and risk of lung cancer: Systematic review and dose-response meta-analysis

Questions remain about the significance of the dose-response relationship between body mass index (BMI) and lung cancer (LC) risk. Pertinent studies were identified through a search in EMBASE and PUBMED from July 2014 until March 2015. The summary relative risk (SRR) and confidence interval (CI) wer...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Duan, Peng, Hu, Chunhui, Quan, Chao, Yi, Xianfu, Zhou, Wei, Yuan, Meng, Yu, Tingting, Kourouma, Ansoumane, Yang, Kedi
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Nature Publishing Group 2015
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4652238/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26582414
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/srep16938
_version_ 1782401713043406848
author Duan, Peng
Hu, Chunhui
Quan, Chao
Yi, Xianfu
Zhou, Wei
Yuan, Meng
Yu, Tingting
Kourouma, Ansoumane
Yang, Kedi
author_facet Duan, Peng
Hu, Chunhui
Quan, Chao
Yi, Xianfu
Zhou, Wei
Yuan, Meng
Yu, Tingting
Kourouma, Ansoumane
Yang, Kedi
author_sort Duan, Peng
collection PubMed
description Questions remain about the significance of the dose-response relationship between body mass index (BMI) and lung cancer (LC) risk. Pertinent studies were identified through a search in EMBASE and PUBMED from July 2014 until March 2015. The summary relative risk (SRR) and confidence interval (CI) were estimated. The dose-response relationship was assessed using a restricted cubic spline. The overall meta-analysis showed evidence of a nonlinear association between BMI and LC risk (P(nonlinearity) < 0.001). The SRR were 0.98 (95%CI: 0.95–1.01) for 25 kg/m(2), 0.91 (95%CI: 0.85–0.98) for 30 kg/m(2) and 0.81 (95% CI: 0.72–0.91) for 35 kg/m(2), with mild between-study heterogeneity (I(2) = 5%). The results of the stratified analysis by gender were comparable to those of the overall meta-analysis. When stratified by smoking status, linear dose-response associations were observed for current smokers, ex-smokers and non-smokers (P(nonlinearity) > 0.05), whereas the effects were attenuated when restricting analysis to non-smokers, and at the point of 30 kg/m(2), the SRR was 0.96 (95%CI: 0.86–1.07) for males and 0.95 (95%CI: 0.89–1.02) for females. This meta-analysis provides quantitative evidence that increasing BMI is a protective factor against LC. Keeping normal-to-moderate BMI should be prescribed as an evidence-based lifestyle tip for LC prevention in smokers.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4652238
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2015
publisher Nature Publishing Group
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-46522382015-11-24 Body mass index and risk of lung cancer: Systematic review and dose-response meta-analysis Duan, Peng Hu, Chunhui Quan, Chao Yi, Xianfu Zhou, Wei Yuan, Meng Yu, Tingting Kourouma, Ansoumane Yang, Kedi Sci Rep Article Questions remain about the significance of the dose-response relationship between body mass index (BMI) and lung cancer (LC) risk. Pertinent studies were identified through a search in EMBASE and PUBMED from July 2014 until March 2015. The summary relative risk (SRR) and confidence interval (CI) were estimated. The dose-response relationship was assessed using a restricted cubic spline. The overall meta-analysis showed evidence of a nonlinear association between BMI and LC risk (P(nonlinearity) < 0.001). The SRR were 0.98 (95%CI: 0.95–1.01) for 25 kg/m(2), 0.91 (95%CI: 0.85–0.98) for 30 kg/m(2) and 0.81 (95% CI: 0.72–0.91) for 35 kg/m(2), with mild between-study heterogeneity (I(2) = 5%). The results of the stratified analysis by gender were comparable to those of the overall meta-analysis. When stratified by smoking status, linear dose-response associations were observed for current smokers, ex-smokers and non-smokers (P(nonlinearity) > 0.05), whereas the effects were attenuated when restricting analysis to non-smokers, and at the point of 30 kg/m(2), the SRR was 0.96 (95%CI: 0.86–1.07) for males and 0.95 (95%CI: 0.89–1.02) for females. This meta-analysis provides quantitative evidence that increasing BMI is a protective factor against LC. Keeping normal-to-moderate BMI should be prescribed as an evidence-based lifestyle tip for LC prevention in smokers. Nature Publishing Group 2015-11-19 /pmc/articles/PMC4652238/ /pubmed/26582414 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/srep16938 Text en Copyright © 2015, Macmillan Publishers Limited http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in the credit line; if the material is not included under the Creative Commons license, users will need to obtain permission from the license holder to reproduce the material. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
spellingShingle Article
Duan, Peng
Hu, Chunhui
Quan, Chao
Yi, Xianfu
Zhou, Wei
Yuan, Meng
Yu, Tingting
Kourouma, Ansoumane
Yang, Kedi
Body mass index and risk of lung cancer: Systematic review and dose-response meta-analysis
title Body mass index and risk of lung cancer: Systematic review and dose-response meta-analysis
title_full Body mass index and risk of lung cancer: Systematic review and dose-response meta-analysis
title_fullStr Body mass index and risk of lung cancer: Systematic review and dose-response meta-analysis
title_full_unstemmed Body mass index and risk of lung cancer: Systematic review and dose-response meta-analysis
title_short Body mass index and risk of lung cancer: Systematic review and dose-response meta-analysis
title_sort body mass index and risk of lung cancer: systematic review and dose-response meta-analysis
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4652238/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26582414
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/srep16938
work_keys_str_mv AT duanpeng bodymassindexandriskoflungcancersystematicreviewanddoseresponsemetaanalysis
AT huchunhui bodymassindexandriskoflungcancersystematicreviewanddoseresponsemetaanalysis
AT quanchao bodymassindexandriskoflungcancersystematicreviewanddoseresponsemetaanalysis
AT yixianfu bodymassindexandriskoflungcancersystematicreviewanddoseresponsemetaanalysis
AT zhouwei bodymassindexandriskoflungcancersystematicreviewanddoseresponsemetaanalysis
AT yuanmeng bodymassindexandriskoflungcancersystematicreviewanddoseresponsemetaanalysis
AT yutingting bodymassindexandriskoflungcancersystematicreviewanddoseresponsemetaanalysis
AT kouroumaansoumane bodymassindexandriskoflungcancersystematicreviewanddoseresponsemetaanalysis
AT yangkedi bodymassindexandriskoflungcancersystematicreviewanddoseresponsemetaanalysis