Cargando…

The success rate of split-night polysomnography and its impact on continuous positive airway pressure compliance

OBJECTIVES: With the increased volume of referrals of patients with obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) for sleep studies, there is a great need for alternatives of the standard two-night polysomnography (PSG) like split-night PSG. Therefore, we conducted this study to determine the success rate of contin...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: BaHammam, Ahmed S., ALAnbay, Eiman, Alrajhi, Nuha, Olaish, Awad H.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd 2015
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4652294/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26664566
http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/1817-1737.160359
_version_ 1782401725415555072
author BaHammam, Ahmed S.
ALAnbay, Eiman
Alrajhi, Nuha
Olaish, Awad H.
author_facet BaHammam, Ahmed S.
ALAnbay, Eiman
Alrajhi, Nuha
Olaish, Awad H.
author_sort BaHammam, Ahmed S.
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVES: With the increased volume of referrals of patients with obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) for sleep studies, there is a great need for alternatives of the standard two-night polysomnography (PSG) like split-night PSG. Therefore, we conducted this study to determine the success rate of continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP) titration during split-night PSG, and to determine the predictors of titration success and the impact on subsequent CPAP compliance in Saudi patients with OSA. METHODS: This is a prospective cohort study that included consecutive patients who were diagnosed with OSA and underwent a split-night PSG (n = 454). A subgroup of patients who used CPAP therapy, agreed to come for follow-up after 4 and 10 months (n = 130). This subgroup was compared with a matched group of OSA patients who underwent a two-night sleep study protocol (n = 80). RESULTS: The study group had a mean age of 48.7 ± 13.3 years, body mass index (BMI) of 37.5 ± 10.1 kg/m(2) and apnea hypopnea index of 58.4 ± 35.0 events/h. Successful CPAP titration was achieved in 350 (77%) patients. In a full adjusted model, “BMI >35 kg/m(2)” and “known cardiac disease” remained significant predictors of a lower success rate of CPAP titration. After 10 months, 88% of the patients in the split-night protocol met the set criteria for good compliance versus 85% in the two-night protocol. CONCLUSION: Split-night protocol is an effective protocol for diagnosing OSA and titrating CPAP. CPAP compliance rate showed no difference between the split-night and the two-night protocols.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4652294
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2015
publisher Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-46522942015-12-09 The success rate of split-night polysomnography and its impact on continuous positive airway pressure compliance BaHammam, Ahmed S. ALAnbay, Eiman Alrajhi, Nuha Olaish, Awad H. Ann Thorac Med Original Article OBJECTIVES: With the increased volume of referrals of patients with obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) for sleep studies, there is a great need for alternatives of the standard two-night polysomnography (PSG) like split-night PSG. Therefore, we conducted this study to determine the success rate of continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP) titration during split-night PSG, and to determine the predictors of titration success and the impact on subsequent CPAP compliance in Saudi patients with OSA. METHODS: This is a prospective cohort study that included consecutive patients who were diagnosed with OSA and underwent a split-night PSG (n = 454). A subgroup of patients who used CPAP therapy, agreed to come for follow-up after 4 and 10 months (n = 130). This subgroup was compared with a matched group of OSA patients who underwent a two-night sleep study protocol (n = 80). RESULTS: The study group had a mean age of 48.7 ± 13.3 years, body mass index (BMI) of 37.5 ± 10.1 kg/m(2) and apnea hypopnea index of 58.4 ± 35.0 events/h. Successful CPAP titration was achieved in 350 (77%) patients. In a full adjusted model, “BMI >35 kg/m(2)” and “known cardiac disease” remained significant predictors of a lower success rate of CPAP titration. After 10 months, 88% of the patients in the split-night protocol met the set criteria for good compliance versus 85% in the two-night protocol. CONCLUSION: Split-night protocol is an effective protocol for diagnosing OSA and titrating CPAP. CPAP compliance rate showed no difference between the split-night and the two-night protocols. Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd 2015 /pmc/articles/PMC4652294/ /pubmed/26664566 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/1817-1737.160359 Text en Copyright: © 2015 Annals of Thoracic Medicine http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/3.0 This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 3.0 License, which allows others to remix, tweak, and build upon the work non-commercially, as long as the author is credited and the new creations are licensed under the identical terms.
spellingShingle Original Article
BaHammam, Ahmed S.
ALAnbay, Eiman
Alrajhi, Nuha
Olaish, Awad H.
The success rate of split-night polysomnography and its impact on continuous positive airway pressure compliance
title The success rate of split-night polysomnography and its impact on continuous positive airway pressure compliance
title_full The success rate of split-night polysomnography and its impact on continuous positive airway pressure compliance
title_fullStr The success rate of split-night polysomnography and its impact on continuous positive airway pressure compliance
title_full_unstemmed The success rate of split-night polysomnography and its impact on continuous positive airway pressure compliance
title_short The success rate of split-night polysomnography and its impact on continuous positive airway pressure compliance
title_sort success rate of split-night polysomnography and its impact on continuous positive airway pressure compliance
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4652294/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26664566
http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/1817-1737.160359
work_keys_str_mv AT bahammamahmeds thesuccessrateofsplitnightpolysomnographyanditsimpactoncontinuouspositiveairwaypressurecompliance
AT alanbayeiman thesuccessrateofsplitnightpolysomnographyanditsimpactoncontinuouspositiveairwaypressurecompliance
AT alrajhinuha thesuccessrateofsplitnightpolysomnographyanditsimpactoncontinuouspositiveairwaypressurecompliance
AT olaishawadh thesuccessrateofsplitnightpolysomnographyanditsimpactoncontinuouspositiveairwaypressurecompliance
AT bahammamahmeds successrateofsplitnightpolysomnographyanditsimpactoncontinuouspositiveairwaypressurecompliance
AT alanbayeiman successrateofsplitnightpolysomnographyanditsimpactoncontinuouspositiveairwaypressurecompliance
AT alrajhinuha successrateofsplitnightpolysomnographyanditsimpactoncontinuouspositiveairwaypressurecompliance
AT olaishawadh successrateofsplitnightpolysomnographyanditsimpactoncontinuouspositiveairwaypressurecompliance