Cargando…

Vitamin D intake, serum Vitamin D levels, and risk of gastric cancer: A systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND: We are aware of no systematic review or meta-analysis of published findings about the association between Vitamin D status and risk of gastric cancer (GC). We systematically reviewed the current evidence on the association between Vitamin D intake as well as serum 25-hydroxy Vitamin D (2...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Khayatzadeh, Saeid, Feizi, Awat, Saneei, Parvane, Esmaillzadeh, Ahmad
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd 2015
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4652314/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26664428
http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/1735-1995.168404
_version_ 1782401729709473792
author Khayatzadeh, Saeid
Feizi, Awat
Saneei, Parvane
Esmaillzadeh, Ahmad
author_facet Khayatzadeh, Saeid
Feizi, Awat
Saneei, Parvane
Esmaillzadeh, Ahmad
author_sort Khayatzadeh, Saeid
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: We are aware of no systematic review or meta-analysis of published findings about the association between Vitamin D status and risk of gastric cancer (GC). We systematically reviewed the current evidence on the association between Vitamin D intake as well as serum 25-hydroxy Vitamin D (25(OH)D) levels and risk of GC. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Published evidence in this area was searched to August 2014 through the use of ISI Web of Science, Scopus, PubMed/Medline, Ovid Database, EMBASE, and Google Scholar for relevant articles by cross-referencing. Seven articles had reported odds ratios (ORs) or relative risks (RR) as their effect size; four papers had reported the ORs between Vitamin D intake and GC; and three papers had reported the association between serum 25(OH)D and risk of GC. RESULTS: Pooled effect size for comparison of highest versus lowest intakes of Vitamin D was 1.09 (95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.94, 1.25; P = 0.26) indicating no significant association between Vitamin D intake and risk of GC. We failed to find a significant association between serum Vitamin D levels and risk of GC (OR: 0.92; 95% CI: 0.74-1.14; P = 0.429). Among men, the pooled effect size or highest versus lowest category of serum Vitamin D levels was 0.92 (95% CI: 0.71, 1.18, P = 0.49). The corresponding figures in women were 1.04 and 95% CI: 0.74-1.47 (P = 0.80). CONCLUSION: We found no evidence for the significant association between Vitamin D status and risk of GC. However, due to limited data in this field, further studies are required to reach a definite conclusion.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4652314
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2015
publisher Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-46523142015-12-09 Vitamin D intake, serum Vitamin D levels, and risk of gastric cancer: A systematic review and meta-analysis Khayatzadeh, Saeid Feizi, Awat Saneei, Parvane Esmaillzadeh, Ahmad J Res Med Sci Review Article BACKGROUND: We are aware of no systematic review or meta-analysis of published findings about the association between Vitamin D status and risk of gastric cancer (GC). We systematically reviewed the current evidence on the association between Vitamin D intake as well as serum 25-hydroxy Vitamin D (25(OH)D) levels and risk of GC. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Published evidence in this area was searched to August 2014 through the use of ISI Web of Science, Scopus, PubMed/Medline, Ovid Database, EMBASE, and Google Scholar for relevant articles by cross-referencing. Seven articles had reported odds ratios (ORs) or relative risks (RR) as their effect size; four papers had reported the ORs between Vitamin D intake and GC; and three papers had reported the association between serum 25(OH)D and risk of GC. RESULTS: Pooled effect size for comparison of highest versus lowest intakes of Vitamin D was 1.09 (95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.94, 1.25; P = 0.26) indicating no significant association between Vitamin D intake and risk of GC. We failed to find a significant association between serum Vitamin D levels and risk of GC (OR: 0.92; 95% CI: 0.74-1.14; P = 0.429). Among men, the pooled effect size or highest versus lowest category of serum Vitamin D levels was 0.92 (95% CI: 0.71, 1.18, P = 0.49). The corresponding figures in women were 1.04 and 95% CI: 0.74-1.47 (P = 0.80). CONCLUSION: We found no evidence for the significant association between Vitamin D status and risk of GC. However, due to limited data in this field, further studies are required to reach a definite conclusion. Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd 2015-08 /pmc/articles/PMC4652314/ /pubmed/26664428 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/1735-1995.168404 Text en Copyright: © 2015 Journal of Research in Medical Sciences http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/3.0 This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 3.0 License, which allows others to remix, tweak, and build upon the work non-commercially, as long as the author is credited and the new creations are licensed under the identical terms.
spellingShingle Review Article
Khayatzadeh, Saeid
Feizi, Awat
Saneei, Parvane
Esmaillzadeh, Ahmad
Vitamin D intake, serum Vitamin D levels, and risk of gastric cancer: A systematic review and meta-analysis
title Vitamin D intake, serum Vitamin D levels, and risk of gastric cancer: A systematic review and meta-analysis
title_full Vitamin D intake, serum Vitamin D levels, and risk of gastric cancer: A systematic review and meta-analysis
title_fullStr Vitamin D intake, serum Vitamin D levels, and risk of gastric cancer: A systematic review and meta-analysis
title_full_unstemmed Vitamin D intake, serum Vitamin D levels, and risk of gastric cancer: A systematic review and meta-analysis
title_short Vitamin D intake, serum Vitamin D levels, and risk of gastric cancer: A systematic review and meta-analysis
title_sort vitamin d intake, serum vitamin d levels, and risk of gastric cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis
topic Review Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4652314/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26664428
http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/1735-1995.168404
work_keys_str_mv AT khayatzadehsaeid vitamindintakeserumvitamindlevelsandriskofgastriccancerasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT feiziawat vitamindintakeserumvitamindlevelsandriskofgastriccancerasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT saneeiparvane vitamindintakeserumvitamindlevelsandriskofgastriccancerasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT esmaillzadehahmad vitamindintakeserumvitamindlevelsandriskofgastriccancerasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis