Cargando…
Anti-IgE monoclonal antibody therapy for the treatment of chronic rhinosinusitis: a systematic review
BACKGROUND: Several options are available for the treatment of chronic rhinosinusitis (CRS), but disease control remains elusive for many patients. Recently, literature has emerged describing anti-IgE monoclonal antibody as a potential therapy for CRS. However, its effectiveness and safety are not w...
Autores principales: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2015
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4652338/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26581392 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13643-015-0157-5 |
_version_ | 1782401732871979008 |
---|---|
author | Hong, Chris J. Tsang, Adrian C. Quinn, Jason G. Bonaparte, James P. Stevens, Adrienne Kilty, Shaun J. |
author_facet | Hong, Chris J. Tsang, Adrian C. Quinn, Jason G. Bonaparte, James P. Stevens, Adrienne Kilty, Shaun J. |
author_sort | Hong, Chris J. |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Several options are available for the treatment of chronic rhinosinusitis (CRS), but disease control remains elusive for many patients. Recently, literature has emerged describing anti-IgE monoclonal antibody as a potential therapy for CRS. However, its effectiveness and safety are not well known. The purpose of this systematic review was to assess the effectiveness and safety of anti-IgE therapy and to identify evidence gaps that will guide future research for the management of CRS. METHODS: Methodology was registered with PROSPERO (No. CRD42014007600). A comprehensive search was performed of standard bibliographic databases, Google Scholar, and clinical trials registries. Only randomized controlled trials assessing anti-IgE therapy in adult patients for the treatment of CRS were included. Two independent reviewers extracted data using a pre-defined extraction form and performed quality assessment using the Cochrane risk of bias tool and the GRADE framework. RESULTS: Two studies met our inclusion criteria. When comparing anti-IgE therapy to placebo, there was a significant difference in Lund-McKay score (p = 0.04) while no difference was seen for percent opacification on computed tomography (CT). At 16 weeks, treatment led to a decrease in clinical polyp score. No significant difference was seen with regard to quality of life (Total Nasal Symptom Severity (TNSS), p < 0.21; Sinonasal Outcome Test 20 (SNOT-20), p < 0.60), and no serious complications were reported in either trial. Based on the quality assessment, studies were deemed to be of moderate risk of bias and a low overall quality of evidence. CONCLUSIONS: There is currently insufficient evidence to determine the effectiveness of anti-IgE monoclonal antibody therapy for the treatment of CRS. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (doi:10.1186/s13643-015-0157-5) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-4652338 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2015 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-46523382015-11-20 Anti-IgE monoclonal antibody therapy for the treatment of chronic rhinosinusitis: a systematic review Hong, Chris J. Tsang, Adrian C. Quinn, Jason G. Bonaparte, James P. Stevens, Adrienne Kilty, Shaun J. Syst Rev Research BACKGROUND: Several options are available for the treatment of chronic rhinosinusitis (CRS), but disease control remains elusive for many patients. Recently, literature has emerged describing anti-IgE monoclonal antibody as a potential therapy for CRS. However, its effectiveness and safety are not well known. The purpose of this systematic review was to assess the effectiveness and safety of anti-IgE therapy and to identify evidence gaps that will guide future research for the management of CRS. METHODS: Methodology was registered with PROSPERO (No. CRD42014007600). A comprehensive search was performed of standard bibliographic databases, Google Scholar, and clinical trials registries. Only randomized controlled trials assessing anti-IgE therapy in adult patients for the treatment of CRS were included. Two independent reviewers extracted data using a pre-defined extraction form and performed quality assessment using the Cochrane risk of bias tool and the GRADE framework. RESULTS: Two studies met our inclusion criteria. When comparing anti-IgE therapy to placebo, there was a significant difference in Lund-McKay score (p = 0.04) while no difference was seen for percent opacification on computed tomography (CT). At 16 weeks, treatment led to a decrease in clinical polyp score. No significant difference was seen with regard to quality of life (Total Nasal Symptom Severity (TNSS), p < 0.21; Sinonasal Outcome Test 20 (SNOT-20), p < 0.60), and no serious complications were reported in either trial. Based on the quality assessment, studies were deemed to be of moderate risk of bias and a low overall quality of evidence. CONCLUSIONS: There is currently insufficient evidence to determine the effectiveness of anti-IgE monoclonal antibody therapy for the treatment of CRS. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (doi:10.1186/s13643-015-0157-5) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. BioMed Central 2015-11-18 /pmc/articles/PMC4652338/ /pubmed/26581392 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13643-015-0157-5 Text en © Hong et al. 2015 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated. |
spellingShingle | Research Hong, Chris J. Tsang, Adrian C. Quinn, Jason G. Bonaparte, James P. Stevens, Adrienne Kilty, Shaun J. Anti-IgE monoclonal antibody therapy for the treatment of chronic rhinosinusitis: a systematic review |
title | Anti-IgE monoclonal antibody therapy for the treatment of chronic rhinosinusitis: a systematic review |
title_full | Anti-IgE monoclonal antibody therapy for the treatment of chronic rhinosinusitis: a systematic review |
title_fullStr | Anti-IgE monoclonal antibody therapy for the treatment of chronic rhinosinusitis: a systematic review |
title_full_unstemmed | Anti-IgE monoclonal antibody therapy for the treatment of chronic rhinosinusitis: a systematic review |
title_short | Anti-IgE monoclonal antibody therapy for the treatment of chronic rhinosinusitis: a systematic review |
title_sort | anti-ige monoclonal antibody therapy for the treatment of chronic rhinosinusitis: a systematic review |
topic | Research |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4652338/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26581392 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13643-015-0157-5 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT hongchrisj antiigemonoclonalantibodytherapyforthetreatmentofchronicrhinosinusitisasystematicreview AT tsangadrianc antiigemonoclonalantibodytherapyforthetreatmentofchronicrhinosinusitisasystematicreview AT quinnjasong antiigemonoclonalantibodytherapyforthetreatmentofchronicrhinosinusitisasystematicreview AT bonapartejamesp antiigemonoclonalantibodytherapyforthetreatmentofchronicrhinosinusitisasystematicreview AT stevensadrienne antiigemonoclonalantibodytherapyforthetreatmentofchronicrhinosinusitisasystematicreview AT kiltyshaunj antiigemonoclonalantibodytherapyforthetreatmentofchronicrhinosinusitisasystematicreview |