Cargando…

Anti-IgE monoclonal antibody therapy for the treatment of chronic rhinosinusitis: a systematic review

BACKGROUND: Several options are available for the treatment of chronic rhinosinusitis (CRS), but disease control remains elusive for many patients. Recently, literature has emerged describing anti-IgE monoclonal antibody as a potential therapy for CRS. However, its effectiveness and safety are not w...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Hong, Chris J., Tsang, Adrian C., Quinn, Jason G., Bonaparte, James P., Stevens, Adrienne, Kilty, Shaun J.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2015
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4652338/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26581392
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13643-015-0157-5
_version_ 1782401732871979008
author Hong, Chris J.
Tsang, Adrian C.
Quinn, Jason G.
Bonaparte, James P.
Stevens, Adrienne
Kilty, Shaun J.
author_facet Hong, Chris J.
Tsang, Adrian C.
Quinn, Jason G.
Bonaparte, James P.
Stevens, Adrienne
Kilty, Shaun J.
author_sort Hong, Chris J.
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Several options are available for the treatment of chronic rhinosinusitis (CRS), but disease control remains elusive for many patients. Recently, literature has emerged describing anti-IgE monoclonal antibody as a potential therapy for CRS. However, its effectiveness and safety are not well known. The purpose of this systematic review was to assess the effectiveness and safety of anti-IgE therapy and to identify evidence gaps that will guide future research for the management of CRS. METHODS: Methodology was registered with PROSPERO (No. CRD42014007600). A comprehensive search was performed of standard bibliographic databases, Google Scholar, and clinical trials registries. Only randomized controlled trials assessing anti-IgE therapy in adult patients for the treatment of CRS were included. Two independent reviewers extracted data using a pre-defined extraction form and performed quality assessment using the Cochrane risk of bias tool and the GRADE framework. RESULTS: Two studies met our inclusion criteria. When comparing anti-IgE therapy to placebo, there was a significant difference in Lund-McKay score (p = 0.04) while no difference was seen for percent opacification on computed tomography (CT). At 16 weeks, treatment led to a decrease in clinical polyp score. No significant difference was seen with regard to quality of life (Total Nasal Symptom Severity (TNSS), p < 0.21; Sinonasal Outcome Test 20 (SNOT-20), p < 0.60), and no serious complications were reported in either trial. Based on the quality assessment, studies were deemed to be of moderate risk of bias and a low overall quality of evidence. CONCLUSIONS: There is currently insufficient evidence to determine the effectiveness of anti-IgE monoclonal antibody therapy for the treatment of CRS. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (doi:10.1186/s13643-015-0157-5) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4652338
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2015
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-46523382015-11-20 Anti-IgE monoclonal antibody therapy for the treatment of chronic rhinosinusitis: a systematic review Hong, Chris J. Tsang, Adrian C. Quinn, Jason G. Bonaparte, James P. Stevens, Adrienne Kilty, Shaun J. Syst Rev Research BACKGROUND: Several options are available for the treatment of chronic rhinosinusitis (CRS), but disease control remains elusive for many patients. Recently, literature has emerged describing anti-IgE monoclonal antibody as a potential therapy for CRS. However, its effectiveness and safety are not well known. The purpose of this systematic review was to assess the effectiveness and safety of anti-IgE therapy and to identify evidence gaps that will guide future research for the management of CRS. METHODS: Methodology was registered with PROSPERO (No. CRD42014007600). A comprehensive search was performed of standard bibliographic databases, Google Scholar, and clinical trials registries. Only randomized controlled trials assessing anti-IgE therapy in adult patients for the treatment of CRS were included. Two independent reviewers extracted data using a pre-defined extraction form and performed quality assessment using the Cochrane risk of bias tool and the GRADE framework. RESULTS: Two studies met our inclusion criteria. When comparing anti-IgE therapy to placebo, there was a significant difference in Lund-McKay score (p = 0.04) while no difference was seen for percent opacification on computed tomography (CT). At 16 weeks, treatment led to a decrease in clinical polyp score. No significant difference was seen with regard to quality of life (Total Nasal Symptom Severity (TNSS), p < 0.21; Sinonasal Outcome Test 20 (SNOT-20), p < 0.60), and no serious complications were reported in either trial. Based on the quality assessment, studies were deemed to be of moderate risk of bias and a low overall quality of evidence. CONCLUSIONS: There is currently insufficient evidence to determine the effectiveness of anti-IgE monoclonal antibody therapy for the treatment of CRS. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (doi:10.1186/s13643-015-0157-5) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. BioMed Central 2015-11-18 /pmc/articles/PMC4652338/ /pubmed/26581392 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13643-015-0157-5 Text en © Hong et al. 2015 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Research
Hong, Chris J.
Tsang, Adrian C.
Quinn, Jason G.
Bonaparte, James P.
Stevens, Adrienne
Kilty, Shaun J.
Anti-IgE monoclonal antibody therapy for the treatment of chronic rhinosinusitis: a systematic review
title Anti-IgE monoclonal antibody therapy for the treatment of chronic rhinosinusitis: a systematic review
title_full Anti-IgE monoclonal antibody therapy for the treatment of chronic rhinosinusitis: a systematic review
title_fullStr Anti-IgE monoclonal antibody therapy for the treatment of chronic rhinosinusitis: a systematic review
title_full_unstemmed Anti-IgE monoclonal antibody therapy for the treatment of chronic rhinosinusitis: a systematic review
title_short Anti-IgE monoclonal antibody therapy for the treatment of chronic rhinosinusitis: a systematic review
title_sort anti-ige monoclonal antibody therapy for the treatment of chronic rhinosinusitis: a systematic review
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4652338/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26581392
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13643-015-0157-5
work_keys_str_mv AT hongchrisj antiigemonoclonalantibodytherapyforthetreatmentofchronicrhinosinusitisasystematicreview
AT tsangadrianc antiigemonoclonalantibodytherapyforthetreatmentofchronicrhinosinusitisasystematicreview
AT quinnjasong antiigemonoclonalantibodytherapyforthetreatmentofchronicrhinosinusitisasystematicreview
AT bonapartejamesp antiigemonoclonalantibodytherapyforthetreatmentofchronicrhinosinusitisasystematicreview
AT stevensadrienne antiigemonoclonalantibodytherapyforthetreatmentofchronicrhinosinusitisasystematicreview
AT kiltyshaunj antiigemonoclonalantibodytherapyforthetreatmentofchronicrhinosinusitisasystematicreview