Cargando…

Identification and annotation of conserved promoters and macrophage-expressed genes in the pig genome

BACKGROUND: The FANTOM5 consortium used Cap Analysis of Gene Expression (CAGE) tag sequencing to produce a comprehensive atlas of promoters and enhancers within the human and mouse genomes. We reasoned that the mapping of these regulatory elements to the pig genome could provide useful annotation an...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Robert, Christelle, Kapetanovic, Ronan, Beraldi, Dario, Watson, Mick, Archibald, Alan L., Hume, David A.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2015
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4652390/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26582032
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12864-015-2111-2
_version_ 1782401744134733824
author Robert, Christelle
Kapetanovic, Ronan
Beraldi, Dario
Watson, Mick
Archibald, Alan L.
Hume, David A.
author_facet Robert, Christelle
Kapetanovic, Ronan
Beraldi, Dario
Watson, Mick
Archibald, Alan L.
Hume, David A.
author_sort Robert, Christelle
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: The FANTOM5 consortium used Cap Analysis of Gene Expression (CAGE) tag sequencing to produce a comprehensive atlas of promoters and enhancers within the human and mouse genomes. We reasoned that the mapping of these regulatory elements to the pig genome could provide useful annotation and evidence to support assignment of orthology. RESULTS: For human transcription start sites (TSS) associated with annotated human-mouse orthologs, 17% mapped to the pig genome but not to the mouse, 10% mapped only to the mouse, and 55% mapped to both pig and mouse. Around 17% did not map to either species. The mapping percentages were lower where there was not clear orthology relationship, but in every case, mapping to pig was greater than to mouse, and the degree of homology was also greater. Combined mapping of mouse and human CAGE-defined promoters identified at least one putative conserved TSS for >16,000 protein-coding genes. About 54% of the predicted locations of regulatory elements in the pig genome were supported by CAGE and/or RNA-Seq analysis from pig macrophages. CONCLUSIONS: Comparative mapping of promoters and enhancers from humans and mice can provide useful preliminary annotation of other animal genomes. The data also confirm extensive gain and loss of regulatory elements between species, and the likelihood that pigs provide a better model than mice for human gene regulation and function. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (doi:10.1186/s12864-015-2111-2) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4652390
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2015
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-46523902015-11-20 Identification and annotation of conserved promoters and macrophage-expressed genes in the pig genome Robert, Christelle Kapetanovic, Ronan Beraldi, Dario Watson, Mick Archibald, Alan L. Hume, David A. BMC Genomics Research Article BACKGROUND: The FANTOM5 consortium used Cap Analysis of Gene Expression (CAGE) tag sequencing to produce a comprehensive atlas of promoters and enhancers within the human and mouse genomes. We reasoned that the mapping of these regulatory elements to the pig genome could provide useful annotation and evidence to support assignment of orthology. RESULTS: For human transcription start sites (TSS) associated with annotated human-mouse orthologs, 17% mapped to the pig genome but not to the mouse, 10% mapped only to the mouse, and 55% mapped to both pig and mouse. Around 17% did not map to either species. The mapping percentages were lower where there was not clear orthology relationship, but in every case, mapping to pig was greater than to mouse, and the degree of homology was also greater. Combined mapping of mouse and human CAGE-defined promoters identified at least one putative conserved TSS for >16,000 protein-coding genes. About 54% of the predicted locations of regulatory elements in the pig genome were supported by CAGE and/or RNA-Seq analysis from pig macrophages. CONCLUSIONS: Comparative mapping of promoters and enhancers from humans and mice can provide useful preliminary annotation of other animal genomes. The data also confirm extensive gain and loss of regulatory elements between species, and the likelihood that pigs provide a better model than mice for human gene regulation and function. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (doi:10.1186/s12864-015-2111-2) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. BioMed Central 2015-11-18 /pmc/articles/PMC4652390/ /pubmed/26582032 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12864-015-2111-2 Text en © Robert et al. 2015 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Research Article
Robert, Christelle
Kapetanovic, Ronan
Beraldi, Dario
Watson, Mick
Archibald, Alan L.
Hume, David A.
Identification and annotation of conserved promoters and macrophage-expressed genes in the pig genome
title Identification and annotation of conserved promoters and macrophage-expressed genes in the pig genome
title_full Identification and annotation of conserved promoters and macrophage-expressed genes in the pig genome
title_fullStr Identification and annotation of conserved promoters and macrophage-expressed genes in the pig genome
title_full_unstemmed Identification and annotation of conserved promoters and macrophage-expressed genes in the pig genome
title_short Identification and annotation of conserved promoters and macrophage-expressed genes in the pig genome
title_sort identification and annotation of conserved promoters and macrophage-expressed genes in the pig genome
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4652390/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26582032
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12864-015-2111-2
work_keys_str_mv AT robertchristelle identificationandannotationofconservedpromotersandmacrophageexpressedgenesinthepiggenome
AT kapetanovicronan identificationandannotationofconservedpromotersandmacrophageexpressedgenesinthepiggenome
AT beraldidario identificationandannotationofconservedpromotersandmacrophageexpressedgenesinthepiggenome
AT watsonmick identificationandannotationofconservedpromotersandmacrophageexpressedgenesinthepiggenome
AT archibaldalanl identificationandannotationofconservedpromotersandmacrophageexpressedgenesinthepiggenome
AT humedavida identificationandannotationofconservedpromotersandmacrophageexpressedgenesinthepiggenome