Cargando…

Transarticular fixation by hook plate versus coracoclavicular stabilization by single multistrand titanium cable for acute Rockwood grade-V acromioclavicular joint dislocation: a case–control study

BACKGROUND: Hook plate (HP) is popularly used for acute and severely displaced acromioclavicular (AC) dislocations. However, subacromial impingement and acromion osteolysis induced by transarticular fixation are notorious. The current case–control study was to compare transarticular fixation by HP t...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Gao, You-Shui, Zhang, Yue-Lei, Ai, Zi-Sheng, Sun, Yu-Qiang, Zhang, Chang-Qing, Zhang, Wei
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2015
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4652419/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26585649
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12891-015-0820-y
_version_ 1782401750701965312
author Gao, You-Shui
Zhang, Yue-Lei
Ai, Zi-Sheng
Sun, Yu-Qiang
Zhang, Chang-Qing
Zhang, Wei
author_facet Gao, You-Shui
Zhang, Yue-Lei
Ai, Zi-Sheng
Sun, Yu-Qiang
Zhang, Chang-Qing
Zhang, Wei
author_sort Gao, You-Shui
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Hook plate (HP) is popularly used for acute and severely displaced acromioclavicular (AC) dislocations. However, subacromial impingement and acromion osteolysis induced by transarticular fixation are notorious. The current case–control study was to compare transarticular fixation by HP to coracoclavicular (CC) stabilization by single multistrand titanium cable (MSTC). METHODS: Between January 2006 and August 2009, 24 patients with acute AC dislocations were surgically treated by open reduction and transarticular fixation with HP. These patients were matched to a series of 24 patients, who were managed by CC stabilization with MSTC in the same period. All AC dislocations were graded as Rockwood type V. Implant was removed 8 -- 12 months after the primary operation in all patients, and 12 months at least were needed to assess the maintenance of AC joint. Functional results were evaluated before implant removal as well as in the last follow-up based on Constant-Murley criteria. RESULTS: There were no differences of demographic data including age, dominant gender and side, injury-to-surgery interval, operation time and follow-up period. In terms of functionality, Constant score was 95.8 ± 4.1 in MSTC group, while 76.7 ± 8.0 in HP group before implant removal (P < 0.001). In detail, MSTC was superior to HP in pain, ROM and activities. Constant score was significantly improved to 86.1 ± 5.7 after hardware removal for patients in HP (P < 0.001). Degenerative change of acromioclavicular joint presented in 16 patients (66.7 %) in patients treated by HP, while it was found in only 3 patients (12.5 %) treated by MSTC (P < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: MSTC is superior to HP for the treatment of Rockwood type-V acromioclavicular dislocation both before and after removal of the implant. Hardware removal is of great benefits for functional improvement in patients treated by HP.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4652419
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2015
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-46524192015-11-20 Transarticular fixation by hook plate versus coracoclavicular stabilization by single multistrand titanium cable for acute Rockwood grade-V acromioclavicular joint dislocation: a case–control study Gao, You-Shui Zhang, Yue-Lei Ai, Zi-Sheng Sun, Yu-Qiang Zhang, Chang-Qing Zhang, Wei BMC Musculoskelet Disord Research Article BACKGROUND: Hook plate (HP) is popularly used for acute and severely displaced acromioclavicular (AC) dislocations. However, subacromial impingement and acromion osteolysis induced by transarticular fixation are notorious. The current case–control study was to compare transarticular fixation by HP to coracoclavicular (CC) stabilization by single multistrand titanium cable (MSTC). METHODS: Between January 2006 and August 2009, 24 patients with acute AC dislocations were surgically treated by open reduction and transarticular fixation with HP. These patients were matched to a series of 24 patients, who were managed by CC stabilization with MSTC in the same period. All AC dislocations were graded as Rockwood type V. Implant was removed 8 -- 12 months after the primary operation in all patients, and 12 months at least were needed to assess the maintenance of AC joint. Functional results were evaluated before implant removal as well as in the last follow-up based on Constant-Murley criteria. RESULTS: There were no differences of demographic data including age, dominant gender and side, injury-to-surgery interval, operation time and follow-up period. In terms of functionality, Constant score was 95.8 ± 4.1 in MSTC group, while 76.7 ± 8.0 in HP group before implant removal (P < 0.001). In detail, MSTC was superior to HP in pain, ROM and activities. Constant score was significantly improved to 86.1 ± 5.7 after hardware removal for patients in HP (P < 0.001). Degenerative change of acromioclavicular joint presented in 16 patients (66.7 %) in patients treated by HP, while it was found in only 3 patients (12.5 %) treated by MSTC (P < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: MSTC is superior to HP for the treatment of Rockwood type-V acromioclavicular dislocation both before and after removal of the implant. Hardware removal is of great benefits for functional improvement in patients treated by HP. BioMed Central 2015-11-19 /pmc/articles/PMC4652419/ /pubmed/26585649 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12891-015-0820-y Text en © Gao et al. 2015 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Research Article
Gao, You-Shui
Zhang, Yue-Lei
Ai, Zi-Sheng
Sun, Yu-Qiang
Zhang, Chang-Qing
Zhang, Wei
Transarticular fixation by hook plate versus coracoclavicular stabilization by single multistrand titanium cable for acute Rockwood grade-V acromioclavicular joint dislocation: a case–control study
title Transarticular fixation by hook plate versus coracoclavicular stabilization by single multistrand titanium cable for acute Rockwood grade-V acromioclavicular joint dislocation: a case–control study
title_full Transarticular fixation by hook plate versus coracoclavicular stabilization by single multistrand titanium cable for acute Rockwood grade-V acromioclavicular joint dislocation: a case–control study
title_fullStr Transarticular fixation by hook plate versus coracoclavicular stabilization by single multistrand titanium cable for acute Rockwood grade-V acromioclavicular joint dislocation: a case–control study
title_full_unstemmed Transarticular fixation by hook plate versus coracoclavicular stabilization by single multistrand titanium cable for acute Rockwood grade-V acromioclavicular joint dislocation: a case–control study
title_short Transarticular fixation by hook plate versus coracoclavicular stabilization by single multistrand titanium cable for acute Rockwood grade-V acromioclavicular joint dislocation: a case–control study
title_sort transarticular fixation by hook plate versus coracoclavicular stabilization by single multistrand titanium cable for acute rockwood grade-v acromioclavicular joint dislocation: a case–control study
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4652419/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26585649
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12891-015-0820-y
work_keys_str_mv AT gaoyoushui transarticularfixationbyhookplateversuscoracoclavicularstabilizationbysinglemultistrandtitaniumcableforacuterockwoodgradevacromioclavicularjointdislocationacasecontrolstudy
AT zhangyuelei transarticularfixationbyhookplateversuscoracoclavicularstabilizationbysinglemultistrandtitaniumcableforacuterockwoodgradevacromioclavicularjointdislocationacasecontrolstudy
AT aizisheng transarticularfixationbyhookplateversuscoracoclavicularstabilizationbysinglemultistrandtitaniumcableforacuterockwoodgradevacromioclavicularjointdislocationacasecontrolstudy
AT sunyuqiang transarticularfixationbyhookplateversuscoracoclavicularstabilizationbysinglemultistrandtitaniumcableforacuterockwoodgradevacromioclavicularjointdislocationacasecontrolstudy
AT zhangchangqing transarticularfixationbyhookplateversuscoracoclavicularstabilizationbysinglemultistrandtitaniumcableforacuterockwoodgradevacromioclavicularjointdislocationacasecontrolstudy
AT zhangwei transarticularfixationbyhookplateversuscoracoclavicularstabilizationbysinglemultistrandtitaniumcableforacuterockwoodgradevacromioclavicularjointdislocationacasecontrolstudy