Cargando…

Emergency suction equipment: barriers to use and effective interventions

Both investigators had personally experienced situations when they were let down by emergency suctioning equipment on the wards: due to either lack of, or operator inability to use, equipment. Failings in emergency suction have been highlighted in a recent National Patient Safety Agency signal. We f...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Carpenter, Alexander, Glenn, Laura
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: British Publishing Group 2013
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4652700/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26734170
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjquality.u200628.w364
_version_ 1782401801419489280
author Carpenter, Alexander
Glenn, Laura
author_facet Carpenter, Alexander
Glenn, Laura
author_sort Carpenter, Alexander
collection PubMed
description Both investigators had personally experienced situations when they were let down by emergency suctioning equipment on the wards: due to either lack of, or operator inability to use, equipment. Failings in emergency suction have been highlighted in a recent National Patient Safety Agency signal. We focused on improving the usability of cardiac arrest trolley suction: a complex process involving turning a small, hidden lever. We produced three clearly visible bright labels which provided simple prompts to the operator. Two wards and two sampling periods were used in a randomised controlled design. Medical, nursing and allied healthcare staff participated. A scenario of a vomiting patient was given and staff were asked to use emergency suction. This was timed. On the control ward, 5/10 staff members were able to successfully suction on day 1 and the mean time spent trying to activate suction was 43 seconds. On the second sampling day 6 were able to successfully suction and the mean time taken was 50 seconds. On the intervention ward, 7/10 staff members were able to suction with a mean time of 53 seconds spent. Post-intervention, all 10 staff members successfully suctioned with an average time of 30 seconds. The intervention gathered strongly positive feedback. These interventions are being incorporated into sustainable systems changes. Poor equipment design is a needless distraction during an emergency in a busy ward setting. Simple, innovative solutions provide assistance in a pressured situation. Ideally these would become uniform and lead to a culture shift towards simple, intuitive design.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4652700
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2013
publisher British Publishing Group
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-46527002016-01-05 Emergency suction equipment: barriers to use and effective interventions Carpenter, Alexander Glenn, Laura BMJ Qual Improv Rep BMJ Quality Improvement Programme Both investigators had personally experienced situations when they were let down by emergency suctioning equipment on the wards: due to either lack of, or operator inability to use, equipment. Failings in emergency suction have been highlighted in a recent National Patient Safety Agency signal. We focused on improving the usability of cardiac arrest trolley suction: a complex process involving turning a small, hidden lever. We produced three clearly visible bright labels which provided simple prompts to the operator. Two wards and two sampling periods were used in a randomised controlled design. Medical, nursing and allied healthcare staff participated. A scenario of a vomiting patient was given and staff were asked to use emergency suction. This was timed. On the control ward, 5/10 staff members were able to successfully suction on day 1 and the mean time spent trying to activate suction was 43 seconds. On the second sampling day 6 were able to successfully suction and the mean time taken was 50 seconds. On the intervention ward, 7/10 staff members were able to suction with a mean time of 53 seconds spent. Post-intervention, all 10 staff members successfully suctioned with an average time of 30 seconds. The intervention gathered strongly positive feedback. These interventions are being incorporated into sustainable systems changes. Poor equipment design is a needless distraction during an emergency in a busy ward setting. Simple, innovative solutions provide assistance in a pressured situation. Ideally these would become uniform and lead to a culture shift towards simple, intuitive design. British Publishing Group 2013-03-25 /pmc/articles/PMC4652700/ /pubmed/26734170 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjquality.u200628.w364 Text en © 2013, Published by the BMJ Publishing Group Limited. For permission to use (where not already granted under a licence) please go to http://group.bmj.com/group/rights-licensing/permissions. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-commercial License, which permits use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited, the use is non commercial and is otherwise in compliance with the license. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/2.0/ http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/2.0/legalcode
spellingShingle BMJ Quality Improvement Programme
Carpenter, Alexander
Glenn, Laura
Emergency suction equipment: barriers to use and effective interventions
title Emergency suction equipment: barriers to use and effective interventions
title_full Emergency suction equipment: barriers to use and effective interventions
title_fullStr Emergency suction equipment: barriers to use and effective interventions
title_full_unstemmed Emergency suction equipment: barriers to use and effective interventions
title_short Emergency suction equipment: barriers to use and effective interventions
title_sort emergency suction equipment: barriers to use and effective interventions
topic BMJ Quality Improvement Programme
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4652700/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26734170
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjquality.u200628.w364
work_keys_str_mv AT carpenteralexander emergencysuctionequipmentbarrierstouseandeffectiveinterventions
AT glennlaura emergencysuctionequipmentbarrierstouseandeffectiveinterventions