Cargando…
The Effect of ‘On-Line’ POCT on Patient waiting times in an Accident and Emergency Department
This POCT (point of care testing) team was constructed at the start of 2012 to implement the POCT project aiming to define and test the hypothesis that interfacing POCT devices to a clinical electronic order communications system reduces patient waiting times in an NHS Accident and Emergency Departm...
Autores principales: | , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
British Publishing Group
2013
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4652707/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26734177 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjquality.u201027.w685 |
_version_ | 1782401803004936192 |
---|---|
author | Gilkar, Ashfaq Fink, Richard Eardley, Philip Barron, Catriona |
author_facet | Gilkar, Ashfaq Fink, Richard Eardley, Philip Barron, Catriona |
author_sort | Gilkar, Ashfaq |
collection | PubMed |
description | This POCT (point of care testing) team was constructed at the start of 2012 to implement the POCT project aiming to define and test the hypothesis that interfacing POCT devices to a clinical electronic order communications system reduces patient waiting times in an NHS Accident and Emergency Department (A&E). The devices selected for evaluation initially comprised the Sysmex XS 1000i haematology analyser and the Abbott i-Stat chemistry analyser. The POCT devices were interfaced to a server (Midlynx) which in turn was connected via the hospital internal network, to the ICE system (Integrated Clinical Environment). Test orders entered on the ICE system produced a bar code label read by the individual POCT devices. Once required tests were assayed, the results were transmitted back to the ICE system, where they could be viewed by users across the hospital site. The quality of POCT analytical performance was assessed by running quality control checks as recommended by the manufacturers and by exchanging samples daily with the clinical laboratory. The I-Stat (a Chemistry analyser manufactured by ‘Abbott plc’) was also tested against material obtained from a national external quality assurance scheme (NEQAS). The time taken to produce POCT tests was calculated as the time elapsed (TE) between requesting tests, and the time at which completed results were returned to the ICE system. Patient waiting times were derived from the patient administration system (Symphony) used in the A&E department. To assess the true effect of POCT on patient waiting times the analysis was confined to cases associated with POCT tests only (n = 217). A control population (n=229) was randomly selected from the clinical laboratory database. The time interval between requesting a test and receiving the results for the POCT tests was 23 minutes and for the laboratory tests, 60 minutes. The patient waiting times (time of discharge - time of arrival) was 167 minutes for the POCT group and 208 for the clinical laboratory group, a difference of 31 minutes. The project confirmed that interfaced (on-line) POCT has many advantages with respect to the quality and safety of data management. The benefits include reliable identification of the requesting clinician and patient and the assurance that the right result is allocated to the right patient. The study also showed that the quality of results produced by the POCT devices met the requirements of the clinical environment. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-4652707 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2013 |
publisher | British Publishing Group |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-46527072016-01-05 The Effect of ‘On-Line’ POCT on Patient waiting times in an Accident and Emergency Department Gilkar, Ashfaq Fink, Richard Eardley, Philip Barron, Catriona BMJ Qual Improv Rep BMJ Quality Improvement Programme This POCT (point of care testing) team was constructed at the start of 2012 to implement the POCT project aiming to define and test the hypothesis that interfacing POCT devices to a clinical electronic order communications system reduces patient waiting times in an NHS Accident and Emergency Department (A&E). The devices selected for evaluation initially comprised the Sysmex XS 1000i haematology analyser and the Abbott i-Stat chemistry analyser. The POCT devices were interfaced to a server (Midlynx) which in turn was connected via the hospital internal network, to the ICE system (Integrated Clinical Environment). Test orders entered on the ICE system produced a bar code label read by the individual POCT devices. Once required tests were assayed, the results were transmitted back to the ICE system, where they could be viewed by users across the hospital site. The quality of POCT analytical performance was assessed by running quality control checks as recommended by the manufacturers and by exchanging samples daily with the clinical laboratory. The I-Stat (a Chemistry analyser manufactured by ‘Abbott plc’) was also tested against material obtained from a national external quality assurance scheme (NEQAS). The time taken to produce POCT tests was calculated as the time elapsed (TE) between requesting tests, and the time at which completed results were returned to the ICE system. Patient waiting times were derived from the patient administration system (Symphony) used in the A&E department. To assess the true effect of POCT on patient waiting times the analysis was confined to cases associated with POCT tests only (n = 217). A control population (n=229) was randomly selected from the clinical laboratory database. The time interval between requesting a test and receiving the results for the POCT tests was 23 minutes and for the laboratory tests, 60 minutes. The patient waiting times (time of discharge - time of arrival) was 167 minutes for the POCT group and 208 for the clinical laboratory group, a difference of 31 minutes. The project confirmed that interfaced (on-line) POCT has many advantages with respect to the quality and safety of data management. The benefits include reliable identification of the requesting clinician and patient and the assurance that the right result is allocated to the right patient. The study also showed that the quality of results produced by the POCT devices met the requirements of the clinical environment. British Publishing Group 2013-04-12 /pmc/articles/PMC4652707/ /pubmed/26734177 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjquality.u201027.w685 Text en © 2013, Published by the BMJ Publishing Group Limited. For permission to use (where not already granted under a licence) please go to http://group.bmj.com/group/rights-licensing/permissions. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-commercial License, which permits use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited, the use is non commercial and is otherwise in compliance with the license. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/2.0/ http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/2.0/legalcode |
spellingShingle | BMJ Quality Improvement Programme Gilkar, Ashfaq Fink, Richard Eardley, Philip Barron, Catriona The Effect of ‘On-Line’ POCT on Patient waiting times in an Accident and Emergency Department |
title | The Effect of ‘On-Line’ POCT on Patient waiting times in an Accident and Emergency Department |
title_full | The Effect of ‘On-Line’ POCT on Patient waiting times in an Accident and Emergency Department |
title_fullStr | The Effect of ‘On-Line’ POCT on Patient waiting times in an Accident and Emergency Department |
title_full_unstemmed | The Effect of ‘On-Line’ POCT on Patient waiting times in an Accident and Emergency Department |
title_short | The Effect of ‘On-Line’ POCT on Patient waiting times in an Accident and Emergency Department |
title_sort | effect of ‘on-line’ poct on patient waiting times in an accident and emergency department |
topic | BMJ Quality Improvement Programme |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4652707/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26734177 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjquality.u201027.w685 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT gilkarashfaq theeffectofonlinepoctonpatientwaitingtimesinanaccidentandemergencydepartment AT finkrichard theeffectofonlinepoctonpatientwaitingtimesinanaccidentandemergencydepartment AT eardleyphilip theeffectofonlinepoctonpatientwaitingtimesinanaccidentandemergencydepartment AT barroncatriona theeffectofonlinepoctonpatientwaitingtimesinanaccidentandemergencydepartment AT gilkarashfaq effectofonlinepoctonpatientwaitingtimesinanaccidentandemergencydepartment AT finkrichard effectofonlinepoctonpatientwaitingtimesinanaccidentandemergencydepartment AT eardleyphilip effectofonlinepoctonpatientwaitingtimesinanaccidentandemergencydepartment AT barroncatriona effectofonlinepoctonpatientwaitingtimesinanaccidentandemergencydepartment |