Cargando…
Pre-Chemoradiotherapy FDG PET/CT cannot Identify Residual Metabolically-Active Volumes within Individual Esophageal Tumors
OBJECTIVE: To study whether subvolumes with a high pre-chemoradiotherapy (CRT) FDG uptake could identify residual metabolically-active volumes (MAVs) post-CRT within individual esophageal tumors. Accurate identification will allow simultaneous integrated boost to these subvolumes at higher risk to i...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
2015
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4652953/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26594591 http://dx.doi.org/10.4172/2155-9619.1000226 |
_version_ | 1782401840311173120 |
---|---|
author | Lu, W Tan, S Chen, W Kligerman, S Feigenberg, SJ Zhang, H Suntharalingam, M Kang, M D’Souza, WD |
author_facet | Lu, W Tan, S Chen, W Kligerman, S Feigenberg, SJ Zhang, H Suntharalingam, M Kang, M D’Souza, WD |
author_sort | Lu, W |
collection | PubMed |
description | OBJECTIVE: To study whether subvolumes with a high pre-chemoradiotherapy (CRT) FDG uptake could identify residual metabolically-active volumes (MAVs) post-CRT within individual esophageal tumors. Accurate identification will allow simultaneous integrated boost to these subvolumes at higher risk to improve clinical outcomes. METHODS: Twenty patients with esophageal cancer were treated with CRT plus surgery and underwent FDG PET/CT scans before and after CRT. The two scans were rigidly registered. Seven MAVs pre-CRT and four MAVs post-CRT within a tumor were defined with various SUV thresholds. The similarity and proximity between the MAVs pre-CRT and post-CRT were quantified with three metrics: fraction of post-CRT MAV included in pre-CRT MAV, volume overlap and centroid distance. RESULTS: Eight patients had no residual MAV. Six patients had local residual MAV (SUV ≥2.5 post-CRT) within or adjoining the original MAV (SUV ≥2.5 pre-CRT). On average, less than 65% of any post-CRT MAVs was included in any pre-CRT MAVs, with a low volume overlap <45%, and large centroid distance >8.6 mm. In general, subvolumes with higher FDG-uptake pre-CRT or post-CRT had lower volume overlap and larger centroid distance. Six patients had new distant MAVs that were determined to be inflammation from radiation therapy. CONCLUSIONS: Pre-CRT PET/CT cannot reliably identify the residual MAVs within individual esophageal tumors. Simultaneous integrated boost to subvolumes with high FDG uptake pre-CRT may not be feasible. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-4652953 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2015 |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-46529532015-11-19 Pre-Chemoradiotherapy FDG PET/CT cannot Identify Residual Metabolically-Active Volumes within Individual Esophageal Tumors Lu, W Tan, S Chen, W Kligerman, S Feigenberg, SJ Zhang, H Suntharalingam, M Kang, M D’Souza, WD J Nucl Med Radiat Ther Article OBJECTIVE: To study whether subvolumes with a high pre-chemoradiotherapy (CRT) FDG uptake could identify residual metabolically-active volumes (MAVs) post-CRT within individual esophageal tumors. Accurate identification will allow simultaneous integrated boost to these subvolumes at higher risk to improve clinical outcomes. METHODS: Twenty patients with esophageal cancer were treated with CRT plus surgery and underwent FDG PET/CT scans before and after CRT. The two scans were rigidly registered. Seven MAVs pre-CRT and four MAVs post-CRT within a tumor were defined with various SUV thresholds. The similarity and proximity between the MAVs pre-CRT and post-CRT were quantified with three metrics: fraction of post-CRT MAV included in pre-CRT MAV, volume overlap and centroid distance. RESULTS: Eight patients had no residual MAV. Six patients had local residual MAV (SUV ≥2.5 post-CRT) within or adjoining the original MAV (SUV ≥2.5 pre-CRT). On average, less than 65% of any post-CRT MAVs was included in any pre-CRT MAVs, with a low volume overlap <45%, and large centroid distance >8.6 mm. In general, subvolumes with higher FDG-uptake pre-CRT or post-CRT had lower volume overlap and larger centroid distance. Six patients had new distant MAVs that were determined to be inflammation from radiation therapy. CONCLUSIONS: Pre-CRT PET/CT cannot reliably identify the residual MAVs within individual esophageal tumors. Simultaneous integrated boost to subvolumes with high FDG uptake pre-CRT may not be feasible. 2015-04-29 2015-05 /pmc/articles/PMC4652953/ /pubmed/26594591 http://dx.doi.org/10.4172/2155-9619.1000226 Text en http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited. |
spellingShingle | Article Lu, W Tan, S Chen, W Kligerman, S Feigenberg, SJ Zhang, H Suntharalingam, M Kang, M D’Souza, WD Pre-Chemoradiotherapy FDG PET/CT cannot Identify Residual Metabolically-Active Volumes within Individual Esophageal Tumors |
title | Pre-Chemoradiotherapy FDG PET/CT cannot Identify Residual Metabolically-Active Volumes within Individual Esophageal Tumors |
title_full | Pre-Chemoradiotherapy FDG PET/CT cannot Identify Residual Metabolically-Active Volumes within Individual Esophageal Tumors |
title_fullStr | Pre-Chemoradiotherapy FDG PET/CT cannot Identify Residual Metabolically-Active Volumes within Individual Esophageal Tumors |
title_full_unstemmed | Pre-Chemoradiotherapy FDG PET/CT cannot Identify Residual Metabolically-Active Volumes within Individual Esophageal Tumors |
title_short | Pre-Chemoradiotherapy FDG PET/CT cannot Identify Residual Metabolically-Active Volumes within Individual Esophageal Tumors |
title_sort | pre-chemoradiotherapy fdg pet/ct cannot identify residual metabolically-active volumes within individual esophageal tumors |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4652953/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26594591 http://dx.doi.org/10.4172/2155-9619.1000226 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT luw prechemoradiotherapyfdgpetctcannotidentifyresidualmetabolicallyactivevolumeswithinindividualesophagealtumors AT tans prechemoradiotherapyfdgpetctcannotidentifyresidualmetabolicallyactivevolumeswithinindividualesophagealtumors AT chenw prechemoradiotherapyfdgpetctcannotidentifyresidualmetabolicallyactivevolumeswithinindividualesophagealtumors AT kligermans prechemoradiotherapyfdgpetctcannotidentifyresidualmetabolicallyactivevolumeswithinindividualesophagealtumors AT feigenbergsj prechemoradiotherapyfdgpetctcannotidentifyresidualmetabolicallyactivevolumeswithinindividualesophagealtumors AT zhangh prechemoradiotherapyfdgpetctcannotidentifyresidualmetabolicallyactivevolumeswithinindividualesophagealtumors AT suntharalingamm prechemoradiotherapyfdgpetctcannotidentifyresidualmetabolicallyactivevolumeswithinindividualesophagealtumors AT kangm prechemoradiotherapyfdgpetctcannotidentifyresidualmetabolicallyactivevolumeswithinindividualesophagealtumors AT dsouzawd prechemoradiotherapyfdgpetctcannotidentifyresidualmetabolicallyactivevolumeswithinindividualesophagealtumors |