Cargando…

Pre-Chemoradiotherapy FDG PET/CT cannot Identify Residual Metabolically-Active Volumes within Individual Esophageal Tumors

OBJECTIVE: To study whether subvolumes with a high pre-chemoradiotherapy (CRT) FDG uptake could identify residual metabolically-active volumes (MAVs) post-CRT within individual esophageal tumors. Accurate identification will allow simultaneous integrated boost to these subvolumes at higher risk to i...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Lu, W, Tan, S, Chen, W, Kligerman, S, Feigenberg, SJ, Zhang, H, Suntharalingam, M, Kang, M, D’Souza, WD
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: 2015
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4652953/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26594591
http://dx.doi.org/10.4172/2155-9619.1000226
_version_ 1782401840311173120
author Lu, W
Tan, S
Chen, W
Kligerman, S
Feigenberg, SJ
Zhang, H
Suntharalingam, M
Kang, M
D’Souza, WD
author_facet Lu, W
Tan, S
Chen, W
Kligerman, S
Feigenberg, SJ
Zhang, H
Suntharalingam, M
Kang, M
D’Souza, WD
author_sort Lu, W
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVE: To study whether subvolumes with a high pre-chemoradiotherapy (CRT) FDG uptake could identify residual metabolically-active volumes (MAVs) post-CRT within individual esophageal tumors. Accurate identification will allow simultaneous integrated boost to these subvolumes at higher risk to improve clinical outcomes. METHODS: Twenty patients with esophageal cancer were treated with CRT plus surgery and underwent FDG PET/CT scans before and after CRT. The two scans were rigidly registered. Seven MAVs pre-CRT and four MAVs post-CRT within a tumor were defined with various SUV thresholds. The similarity and proximity between the MAVs pre-CRT and post-CRT were quantified with three metrics: fraction of post-CRT MAV included in pre-CRT MAV, volume overlap and centroid distance. RESULTS: Eight patients had no residual MAV. Six patients had local residual MAV (SUV ≥2.5 post-CRT) within or adjoining the original MAV (SUV ≥2.5 pre-CRT). On average, less than 65% of any post-CRT MAVs was included in any pre-CRT MAVs, with a low volume overlap <45%, and large centroid distance >8.6 mm. In general, subvolumes with higher FDG-uptake pre-CRT or post-CRT had lower volume overlap and larger centroid distance. Six patients had new distant MAVs that were determined to be inflammation from radiation therapy. CONCLUSIONS: Pre-CRT PET/CT cannot reliably identify the residual MAVs within individual esophageal tumors. Simultaneous integrated boost to subvolumes with high FDG uptake pre-CRT may not be feasible.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4652953
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2015
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-46529532015-11-19 Pre-Chemoradiotherapy FDG PET/CT cannot Identify Residual Metabolically-Active Volumes within Individual Esophageal Tumors Lu, W Tan, S Chen, W Kligerman, S Feigenberg, SJ Zhang, H Suntharalingam, M Kang, M D’Souza, WD J Nucl Med Radiat Ther Article OBJECTIVE: To study whether subvolumes with a high pre-chemoradiotherapy (CRT) FDG uptake could identify residual metabolically-active volumes (MAVs) post-CRT within individual esophageal tumors. Accurate identification will allow simultaneous integrated boost to these subvolumes at higher risk to improve clinical outcomes. METHODS: Twenty patients with esophageal cancer were treated with CRT plus surgery and underwent FDG PET/CT scans before and after CRT. The two scans were rigidly registered. Seven MAVs pre-CRT and four MAVs post-CRT within a tumor were defined with various SUV thresholds. The similarity and proximity between the MAVs pre-CRT and post-CRT were quantified with three metrics: fraction of post-CRT MAV included in pre-CRT MAV, volume overlap and centroid distance. RESULTS: Eight patients had no residual MAV. Six patients had local residual MAV (SUV ≥2.5 post-CRT) within or adjoining the original MAV (SUV ≥2.5 pre-CRT). On average, less than 65% of any post-CRT MAVs was included in any pre-CRT MAVs, with a low volume overlap <45%, and large centroid distance >8.6 mm. In general, subvolumes with higher FDG-uptake pre-CRT or post-CRT had lower volume overlap and larger centroid distance. Six patients had new distant MAVs that were determined to be inflammation from radiation therapy. CONCLUSIONS: Pre-CRT PET/CT cannot reliably identify the residual MAVs within individual esophageal tumors. Simultaneous integrated boost to subvolumes with high FDG uptake pre-CRT may not be feasible. 2015-04-29 2015-05 /pmc/articles/PMC4652953/ /pubmed/26594591 http://dx.doi.org/10.4172/2155-9619.1000226 Text en http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
spellingShingle Article
Lu, W
Tan, S
Chen, W
Kligerman, S
Feigenberg, SJ
Zhang, H
Suntharalingam, M
Kang, M
D’Souza, WD
Pre-Chemoradiotherapy FDG PET/CT cannot Identify Residual Metabolically-Active Volumes within Individual Esophageal Tumors
title Pre-Chemoradiotherapy FDG PET/CT cannot Identify Residual Metabolically-Active Volumes within Individual Esophageal Tumors
title_full Pre-Chemoradiotherapy FDG PET/CT cannot Identify Residual Metabolically-Active Volumes within Individual Esophageal Tumors
title_fullStr Pre-Chemoradiotherapy FDG PET/CT cannot Identify Residual Metabolically-Active Volumes within Individual Esophageal Tumors
title_full_unstemmed Pre-Chemoradiotherapy FDG PET/CT cannot Identify Residual Metabolically-Active Volumes within Individual Esophageal Tumors
title_short Pre-Chemoradiotherapy FDG PET/CT cannot Identify Residual Metabolically-Active Volumes within Individual Esophageal Tumors
title_sort pre-chemoradiotherapy fdg pet/ct cannot identify residual metabolically-active volumes within individual esophageal tumors
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4652953/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26594591
http://dx.doi.org/10.4172/2155-9619.1000226
work_keys_str_mv AT luw prechemoradiotherapyfdgpetctcannotidentifyresidualmetabolicallyactivevolumeswithinindividualesophagealtumors
AT tans prechemoradiotherapyfdgpetctcannotidentifyresidualmetabolicallyactivevolumeswithinindividualesophagealtumors
AT chenw prechemoradiotherapyfdgpetctcannotidentifyresidualmetabolicallyactivevolumeswithinindividualesophagealtumors
AT kligermans prechemoradiotherapyfdgpetctcannotidentifyresidualmetabolicallyactivevolumeswithinindividualesophagealtumors
AT feigenbergsj prechemoradiotherapyfdgpetctcannotidentifyresidualmetabolicallyactivevolumeswithinindividualesophagealtumors
AT zhangh prechemoradiotherapyfdgpetctcannotidentifyresidualmetabolicallyactivevolumeswithinindividualesophagealtumors
AT suntharalingamm prechemoradiotherapyfdgpetctcannotidentifyresidualmetabolicallyactivevolumeswithinindividualesophagealtumors
AT kangm prechemoradiotherapyfdgpetctcannotidentifyresidualmetabolicallyactivevolumeswithinindividualesophagealtumors
AT dsouzawd prechemoradiotherapyfdgpetctcannotidentifyresidualmetabolicallyactivevolumeswithinindividualesophagealtumors