Cargando…
Causality in Psychiatry: A Hybrid Symptom Network Construct Model
Causality or etiology in psychiatry is marked by standard biomedical, reductionistic models (symptoms reflect the construct involved) that inform approaches to nosology, or classification, such as in the DSM-5 [Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, Fifth Edition; (1)]. However, netw...
Autor principal: | |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Frontiers Media S.A.
2015
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4653276/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26635639 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpsyt.2015.00164 |
_version_ | 1782401875709001728 |
---|---|
author | Young, Gerald |
author_facet | Young, Gerald |
author_sort | Young, Gerald |
collection | PubMed |
description | Causality or etiology in psychiatry is marked by standard biomedical, reductionistic models (symptoms reflect the construct involved) that inform approaches to nosology, or classification, such as in the DSM-5 [Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, Fifth Edition; (1)]. However, network approaches to symptom interaction [i.e., symptoms are formative of the construct; e.g., (2), for posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD)] are being developed that speak to bottom-up processes in mental disorder, in contrast to the typical top-down psychological construct approach. The present article presents a hybrid top-down, bottom-up model of the relationship between symptoms and mental disorder, viewing symptom expression and their causal complex as a reciprocally dynamic system with multiple levels, from lower-order symptoms in interaction to higher-order constructs affecting them. The hybrid model hinges on good understanding of systems theory in which it is embedded, so that the article reviews in depth non-linear dynamical systems theory (NLDST). The article applies the concept of emergent circular causality (3) to symptom development, as well. Conclusions consider that symptoms vary over several dimensions, including: subjectivity; objectivity; conscious motivation effort; and unconscious influences, and the degree to which individual (e.g., meaning) and universal (e.g., causal) processes are involved. The opposition between science and skepticism is a complex one that the article addresses in final comments. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-4653276 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2015 |
publisher | Frontiers Media S.A. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-46532762015-12-03 Causality in Psychiatry: A Hybrid Symptom Network Construct Model Young, Gerald Front Psychiatry Psychiatry Causality or etiology in psychiatry is marked by standard biomedical, reductionistic models (symptoms reflect the construct involved) that inform approaches to nosology, or classification, such as in the DSM-5 [Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, Fifth Edition; (1)]. However, network approaches to symptom interaction [i.e., symptoms are formative of the construct; e.g., (2), for posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD)] are being developed that speak to bottom-up processes in mental disorder, in contrast to the typical top-down psychological construct approach. The present article presents a hybrid top-down, bottom-up model of the relationship between symptoms and mental disorder, viewing symptom expression and their causal complex as a reciprocally dynamic system with multiple levels, from lower-order symptoms in interaction to higher-order constructs affecting them. The hybrid model hinges on good understanding of systems theory in which it is embedded, so that the article reviews in depth non-linear dynamical systems theory (NLDST). The article applies the concept of emergent circular causality (3) to symptom development, as well. Conclusions consider that symptoms vary over several dimensions, including: subjectivity; objectivity; conscious motivation effort; and unconscious influences, and the degree to which individual (e.g., meaning) and universal (e.g., causal) processes are involved. The opposition between science and skepticism is a complex one that the article addresses in final comments. Frontiers Media S.A. 2015-11-20 /pmc/articles/PMC4653276/ /pubmed/26635639 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpsyt.2015.00164 Text en Copyright © 2015 Young. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms. |
spellingShingle | Psychiatry Young, Gerald Causality in Psychiatry: A Hybrid Symptom Network Construct Model |
title | Causality in Psychiatry: A Hybrid Symptom Network Construct Model |
title_full | Causality in Psychiatry: A Hybrid Symptom Network Construct Model |
title_fullStr | Causality in Psychiatry: A Hybrid Symptom Network Construct Model |
title_full_unstemmed | Causality in Psychiatry: A Hybrid Symptom Network Construct Model |
title_short | Causality in Psychiatry: A Hybrid Symptom Network Construct Model |
title_sort | causality in psychiatry: a hybrid symptom network construct model |
topic | Psychiatry |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4653276/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26635639 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpsyt.2015.00164 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT younggerald causalityinpsychiatryahybridsymptomnetworkconstructmodel |