Cargando…
Coupled Plasma Filtration Adsorption (CPFA) plus Continuous Veno-Venous Haemofiltration (CVVH) versus CVVH alone as an adjunctive therapy in the treatment of sepsis
Purpose: To compare the efficacy of Coupled Plasma Filtration and Adsorption (CPFA) plus Continuous Veno-Venous Haemofiltration (CVVH) versus CVVH alone as an adjunct treatment of sepsis in terms of haemodynamic stability, inotropic requirement and inflammatory mediators. Design and Methods: Prospec...
Autores principales: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Leibniz Research Centre for Working Environment and Human Factors
2013
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4653725/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26600735 |
_version_ | 1782401964108152832 |
---|---|
author | Hassan, Juita Cader, Rizna Abdul Kong, Norella CT Mohd, Marlyn Rahman, Abdul Raha Hod, Rozita |
author_facet | Hassan, Juita Cader, Rizna Abdul Kong, Norella CT Mohd, Marlyn Rahman, Abdul Raha Hod, Rozita |
author_sort | Hassan, Juita |
collection | PubMed |
description | Purpose: To compare the efficacy of Coupled Plasma Filtration and Adsorption (CPFA) plus Continuous Veno-Venous Haemofiltration (CVVH) versus CVVH alone as an adjunct treatment of sepsis in terms of haemodynamic stability, inotropic requirement and inflammatory mediators. Design and Methods: Prospective randomized controlled trial involving septic patients with/without acute kidney injury (AKI) whom were randomized to receive CPFA + CVVH or CVVH alone. Haemodynamic parameters including inotropic requirements and inflammatory mediators [procalcitonin (PCT) and C reactive protein (CRP)] were measured. Results: Twenty-three patients [CPFA + CVVH (n = 11), CVVH (n = 12)] were enrolled. Haemodynamic stability occurred earlier and sustained in the CPFA + CVVH group with an increase in diastolic blood pressure (p = 0.001 vs. p = 0.226) and mean arterial pressure (p = 0.001 vs. p = 0.575) at the end of treatment with no increment in inotropic requirement. Both groups had a reduction in PCT and CRP (CPFA + CVVH: p = 0.003, p = 0.026 and CVVH: p = 0.008, p = 0.071 respectively). The length of intensive care unit stay, hospital stay and 30 day outcomes were similar between the groups. There was an inverse association between serum albumin and CRP (p = 0.018). Serum albumin positively correlated with systolic blood pressure (p = 0.012) and diastolic blood pressure (p = 0.009). We found a trend between CRP and length of hospital stay (p = 0.056). Patients with a lower PCT at 24 h had a better outcome (survival) than those with a higher PCT (p = 0.045). Conclusion: CPFA is a feasible, albeit expensive adjunctive extracorporeal treatment that may be superior to CVVH alone in the treatment of severe sepsis. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-4653725 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2013 |
publisher | Leibniz Research Centre for Working Environment and Human Factors |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-46537252015-11-23 Coupled Plasma Filtration Adsorption (CPFA) plus Continuous Veno-Venous Haemofiltration (CVVH) versus CVVH alone as an adjunctive therapy in the treatment of sepsis Hassan, Juita Cader, Rizna Abdul Kong, Norella CT Mohd, Marlyn Rahman, Abdul Raha Hod, Rozita EXCLI J Original Article Purpose: To compare the efficacy of Coupled Plasma Filtration and Adsorption (CPFA) plus Continuous Veno-Venous Haemofiltration (CVVH) versus CVVH alone as an adjunct treatment of sepsis in terms of haemodynamic stability, inotropic requirement and inflammatory mediators. Design and Methods: Prospective randomized controlled trial involving septic patients with/without acute kidney injury (AKI) whom were randomized to receive CPFA + CVVH or CVVH alone. Haemodynamic parameters including inotropic requirements and inflammatory mediators [procalcitonin (PCT) and C reactive protein (CRP)] were measured. Results: Twenty-three patients [CPFA + CVVH (n = 11), CVVH (n = 12)] were enrolled. Haemodynamic stability occurred earlier and sustained in the CPFA + CVVH group with an increase in diastolic blood pressure (p = 0.001 vs. p = 0.226) and mean arterial pressure (p = 0.001 vs. p = 0.575) at the end of treatment with no increment in inotropic requirement. Both groups had a reduction in PCT and CRP (CPFA + CVVH: p = 0.003, p = 0.026 and CVVH: p = 0.008, p = 0.071 respectively). The length of intensive care unit stay, hospital stay and 30 day outcomes were similar between the groups. There was an inverse association between serum albumin and CRP (p = 0.018). Serum albumin positively correlated with systolic blood pressure (p = 0.012) and diastolic blood pressure (p = 0.009). We found a trend between CRP and length of hospital stay (p = 0.056). Patients with a lower PCT at 24 h had a better outcome (survival) than those with a higher PCT (p = 0.045). Conclusion: CPFA is a feasible, albeit expensive adjunctive extracorporeal treatment that may be superior to CVVH alone in the treatment of severe sepsis. Leibniz Research Centre for Working Environment and Human Factors 2013-08-12 /pmc/articles/PMC4653725/ /pubmed/26600735 Text en Copyright © 2013 Hassan et al. http://www.excli.de/documents/assignment_of_rights.pdf This is an Open Access article distributed under the following Assignment of Rights http://www.excli.de/documents/assignment_of_rights.pdf. You are free to copy, distribute and transmit the work, provided the original author and source are credited. |
spellingShingle | Original Article Hassan, Juita Cader, Rizna Abdul Kong, Norella CT Mohd, Marlyn Rahman, Abdul Raha Hod, Rozita Coupled Plasma Filtration Adsorption (CPFA) plus Continuous Veno-Venous Haemofiltration (CVVH) versus CVVH alone as an adjunctive therapy in the treatment of sepsis |
title | Coupled Plasma Filtration Adsorption (CPFA) plus Continuous Veno-Venous Haemofiltration (CVVH) versus CVVH alone as an adjunctive therapy in the treatment of sepsis |
title_full | Coupled Plasma Filtration Adsorption (CPFA) plus Continuous Veno-Venous Haemofiltration (CVVH) versus CVVH alone as an adjunctive therapy in the treatment of sepsis |
title_fullStr | Coupled Plasma Filtration Adsorption (CPFA) plus Continuous Veno-Venous Haemofiltration (CVVH) versus CVVH alone as an adjunctive therapy in the treatment of sepsis |
title_full_unstemmed | Coupled Plasma Filtration Adsorption (CPFA) plus Continuous Veno-Venous Haemofiltration (CVVH) versus CVVH alone as an adjunctive therapy in the treatment of sepsis |
title_short | Coupled Plasma Filtration Adsorption (CPFA) plus Continuous Veno-Venous Haemofiltration (CVVH) versus CVVH alone as an adjunctive therapy in the treatment of sepsis |
title_sort | coupled plasma filtration adsorption (cpfa) plus continuous veno-venous haemofiltration (cvvh) versus cvvh alone as an adjunctive therapy in the treatment of sepsis |
topic | Original Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4653725/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26600735 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT hassanjuita coupledplasmafiltrationadsorptioncpfapluscontinuousvenovenoushaemofiltrationcvvhversuscvvhaloneasanadjunctivetherapyinthetreatmentofsepsis AT caderriznaabdul coupledplasmafiltrationadsorptioncpfapluscontinuousvenovenoushaemofiltrationcvvhversuscvvhaloneasanadjunctivetherapyinthetreatmentofsepsis AT kongnorellact coupledplasmafiltrationadsorptioncpfapluscontinuousvenovenoushaemofiltrationcvvhversuscvvhaloneasanadjunctivetherapyinthetreatmentofsepsis AT mohdmarlyn coupledplasmafiltrationadsorptioncpfapluscontinuousvenovenoushaemofiltrationcvvhversuscvvhaloneasanadjunctivetherapyinthetreatmentofsepsis AT rahmanabdulraha coupledplasmafiltrationadsorptioncpfapluscontinuousvenovenoushaemofiltrationcvvhversuscvvhaloneasanadjunctivetherapyinthetreatmentofsepsis AT hodrozita coupledplasmafiltrationadsorptioncpfapluscontinuousvenovenoushaemofiltrationcvvhversuscvvhaloneasanadjunctivetherapyinthetreatmentofsepsis |