Cargando…

Coupled Plasma Filtration Adsorption (CPFA) plus Continuous Veno-Venous Haemofiltration (CVVH) versus CVVH alone as an adjunctive therapy in the treatment of sepsis

Purpose: To compare the efficacy of Coupled Plasma Filtration and Adsorption (CPFA) plus Continuous Veno-Venous Haemofiltration (CVVH) versus CVVH alone as an adjunct treatment of sepsis in terms of haemodynamic stability, inotropic requirement and inflammatory mediators. Design and Methods: Prospec...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Hassan, Juita, Cader, Rizna Abdul, Kong, Norella CT, Mohd, Marlyn, Rahman, Abdul Raha, Hod, Rozita
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Leibniz Research Centre for Working Environment and Human Factors 2013
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4653725/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26600735
_version_ 1782401964108152832
author Hassan, Juita
Cader, Rizna Abdul
Kong, Norella CT
Mohd, Marlyn
Rahman, Abdul Raha
Hod, Rozita
author_facet Hassan, Juita
Cader, Rizna Abdul
Kong, Norella CT
Mohd, Marlyn
Rahman, Abdul Raha
Hod, Rozita
author_sort Hassan, Juita
collection PubMed
description Purpose: To compare the efficacy of Coupled Plasma Filtration and Adsorption (CPFA) plus Continuous Veno-Venous Haemofiltration (CVVH) versus CVVH alone as an adjunct treatment of sepsis in terms of haemodynamic stability, inotropic requirement and inflammatory mediators. Design and Methods: Prospective randomized controlled trial involving septic patients with/without acute kidney injury (AKI) whom were randomized to receive CPFA + CVVH or CVVH alone. Haemodynamic parameters including inotropic requirements and inflammatory mediators [procalcitonin (PCT) and C reactive protein (CRP)] were measured. Results: Twenty-three patients [CPFA + CVVH (n = 11), CVVH (n = 12)] were enrolled. Haemodynamic stability occurred earlier and sustained in the CPFA + CVVH group with an increase in diastolic blood pressure (p = 0.001 vs. p = 0.226) and mean arterial pressure (p = 0.001 vs. p = 0.575) at the end of treatment with no increment in inotropic requirement. Both groups had a reduction in PCT and CRP (CPFA + CVVH: p = 0.003, p = 0.026 and CVVH: p = 0.008, p = 0.071 respectively). The length of intensive care unit stay, hospital stay and 30 day outcomes were similar between the groups. There was an inverse association between serum albumin and CRP (p = 0.018). Serum albumin positively correlated with systolic blood pressure (p = 0.012) and diastolic blood pressure (p = 0.009). We found a trend between CRP and length of hospital stay (p = 0.056). Patients with a lower PCT at 24 h had a better outcome (survival) than those with a higher PCT (p = 0.045). Conclusion: CPFA is a feasible, albeit expensive adjunctive extracorporeal treatment that may be superior to CVVH alone in the treatment of severe sepsis.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4653725
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2013
publisher Leibniz Research Centre for Working Environment and Human Factors
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-46537252015-11-23 Coupled Plasma Filtration Adsorption (CPFA) plus Continuous Veno-Venous Haemofiltration (CVVH) versus CVVH alone as an adjunctive therapy in the treatment of sepsis Hassan, Juita Cader, Rizna Abdul Kong, Norella CT Mohd, Marlyn Rahman, Abdul Raha Hod, Rozita EXCLI J Original Article Purpose: To compare the efficacy of Coupled Plasma Filtration and Adsorption (CPFA) plus Continuous Veno-Venous Haemofiltration (CVVH) versus CVVH alone as an adjunct treatment of sepsis in terms of haemodynamic stability, inotropic requirement and inflammatory mediators. Design and Methods: Prospective randomized controlled trial involving septic patients with/without acute kidney injury (AKI) whom were randomized to receive CPFA + CVVH or CVVH alone. Haemodynamic parameters including inotropic requirements and inflammatory mediators [procalcitonin (PCT) and C reactive protein (CRP)] were measured. Results: Twenty-three patients [CPFA + CVVH (n = 11), CVVH (n = 12)] were enrolled. Haemodynamic stability occurred earlier and sustained in the CPFA + CVVH group with an increase in diastolic blood pressure (p = 0.001 vs. p = 0.226) and mean arterial pressure (p = 0.001 vs. p = 0.575) at the end of treatment with no increment in inotropic requirement. Both groups had a reduction in PCT and CRP (CPFA + CVVH: p = 0.003, p = 0.026 and CVVH: p = 0.008, p = 0.071 respectively). The length of intensive care unit stay, hospital stay and 30 day outcomes were similar between the groups. There was an inverse association between serum albumin and CRP (p = 0.018). Serum albumin positively correlated with systolic blood pressure (p = 0.012) and diastolic blood pressure (p = 0.009). We found a trend between CRP and length of hospital stay (p = 0.056). Patients with a lower PCT at 24 h had a better outcome (survival) than those with a higher PCT (p = 0.045). Conclusion: CPFA is a feasible, albeit expensive adjunctive extracorporeal treatment that may be superior to CVVH alone in the treatment of severe sepsis. Leibniz Research Centre for Working Environment and Human Factors 2013-08-12 /pmc/articles/PMC4653725/ /pubmed/26600735 Text en Copyright © 2013 Hassan et al. http://www.excli.de/documents/assignment_of_rights.pdf This is an Open Access article distributed under the following Assignment of Rights http://www.excli.de/documents/assignment_of_rights.pdf. You are free to copy, distribute and transmit the work, provided the original author and source are credited.
spellingShingle Original Article
Hassan, Juita
Cader, Rizna Abdul
Kong, Norella CT
Mohd, Marlyn
Rahman, Abdul Raha
Hod, Rozita
Coupled Plasma Filtration Adsorption (CPFA) plus Continuous Veno-Venous Haemofiltration (CVVH) versus CVVH alone as an adjunctive therapy in the treatment of sepsis
title Coupled Plasma Filtration Adsorption (CPFA) plus Continuous Veno-Venous Haemofiltration (CVVH) versus CVVH alone as an adjunctive therapy in the treatment of sepsis
title_full Coupled Plasma Filtration Adsorption (CPFA) plus Continuous Veno-Venous Haemofiltration (CVVH) versus CVVH alone as an adjunctive therapy in the treatment of sepsis
title_fullStr Coupled Plasma Filtration Adsorption (CPFA) plus Continuous Veno-Venous Haemofiltration (CVVH) versus CVVH alone as an adjunctive therapy in the treatment of sepsis
title_full_unstemmed Coupled Plasma Filtration Adsorption (CPFA) plus Continuous Veno-Venous Haemofiltration (CVVH) versus CVVH alone as an adjunctive therapy in the treatment of sepsis
title_short Coupled Plasma Filtration Adsorption (CPFA) plus Continuous Veno-Venous Haemofiltration (CVVH) versus CVVH alone as an adjunctive therapy in the treatment of sepsis
title_sort coupled plasma filtration adsorption (cpfa) plus continuous veno-venous haemofiltration (cvvh) versus cvvh alone as an adjunctive therapy in the treatment of sepsis
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4653725/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26600735
work_keys_str_mv AT hassanjuita coupledplasmafiltrationadsorptioncpfapluscontinuousvenovenoushaemofiltrationcvvhversuscvvhaloneasanadjunctivetherapyinthetreatmentofsepsis
AT caderriznaabdul coupledplasmafiltrationadsorptioncpfapluscontinuousvenovenoushaemofiltrationcvvhversuscvvhaloneasanadjunctivetherapyinthetreatmentofsepsis
AT kongnorellact coupledplasmafiltrationadsorptioncpfapluscontinuousvenovenoushaemofiltrationcvvhversuscvvhaloneasanadjunctivetherapyinthetreatmentofsepsis
AT mohdmarlyn coupledplasmafiltrationadsorptioncpfapluscontinuousvenovenoushaemofiltrationcvvhversuscvvhaloneasanadjunctivetherapyinthetreatmentofsepsis
AT rahmanabdulraha coupledplasmafiltrationadsorptioncpfapluscontinuousvenovenoushaemofiltrationcvvhversuscvvhaloneasanadjunctivetherapyinthetreatmentofsepsis
AT hodrozita coupledplasmafiltrationadsorptioncpfapluscontinuousvenovenoushaemofiltrationcvvhversuscvvhaloneasanadjunctivetherapyinthetreatmentofsepsis