Cargando…
Evaluation of sit-stand workstations in an office setting: a randomised controlled trial
BACKGROUND: Excessive sitting time is a risk factor for cardiovascular disease mortality and morbidity independent of physical activity. This aim of this study was to evaluate the impact of a sit-stand workstation on sitting time, and vascular, metabolic and musculoskeletal outcomes in office worker...
Autores principales: | , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2015
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4653846/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26584856 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12889-015-2469-8 |
_version_ | 1782401984853180416 |
---|---|
author | E. F. Graves, Lee C. Murphy, Rebecca Shepherd, Sam O. Cabot, Josephine Hopkins, Nicola D. |
author_facet | E. F. Graves, Lee C. Murphy, Rebecca Shepherd, Sam O. Cabot, Josephine Hopkins, Nicola D. |
author_sort | E. F. Graves, Lee |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Excessive sitting time is a risk factor for cardiovascular disease mortality and morbidity independent of physical activity. This aim of this study was to evaluate the impact of a sit-stand workstation on sitting time, and vascular, metabolic and musculoskeletal outcomes in office workers, and to investigate workstation acceptability and feasibility. METHODS: A two-arm, parallel-group, individually randomised controlled trial was conducted in one organisation. Participants were asymptomatic full-time office workers aged ≥18 years. Each participant in the intervention arm had a sit-stand workstation installed on their workplace desk for 8 weeks. Participants in the control arm received no intervention. The primary outcome was workplace sitting time, assessed at 0, 4 and 8 weeks by an ecological momentary assessment diary. Secondary behavioural, cardiometabolic and musculoskeletal outcomes were assessed. Acceptability and feasibility were assessed via questionnaire and interview. ANCOVA and magnitude-based inferences examined intervention effects relative to controls at 4 and 8 weeks. Participants and researchers were not blind to group allocation. RESULTS: Forty-seven participants were randomised (intervention n = 26; control n = 21). Relative to the control group at 8 weeks, the intervention group had a beneficial decrease in sitting time (−80.2 min/8-h workday (95 % CI = −129.0, −31.4); p = 0.002), increase in standing time (72.9 min/8-h workday (21.2, 124.6); p = 0.007) and decrease in total cholesterol (−0.40 mmol/L (−0.79, −0.003); p = 0.049). No harmful changes in musculoskeletal discomfort/pain were observed relative to controls, and beneficial changes in flow-mediated dilation and diastolic blood pressure were observed. Most participants self-reported that the workstation was easy to use and their work-related productivity did not decrease when using the device. Factors that negatively influenced workstation use were workstation design, the social environment, work tasks and habits. CONCLUSION: Short-term use of a feasible sit-stand workstation reduced daily sitting time and led to beneficial improvements in cardiometabolic risk parameters in asymptomatic office workers. These findings imply that if the observed use of the sit-stand workstations continued over a longer duration, sit-stand workstations may have important ramifications for the prevention and reduction of cardiometabolic risk in a large proportion of the working population. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT02496507. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-4653846 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2015 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-46538462015-11-21 Evaluation of sit-stand workstations in an office setting: a randomised controlled trial E. F. Graves, Lee C. Murphy, Rebecca Shepherd, Sam O. Cabot, Josephine Hopkins, Nicola D. BMC Public Health Research Article BACKGROUND: Excessive sitting time is a risk factor for cardiovascular disease mortality and morbidity independent of physical activity. This aim of this study was to evaluate the impact of a sit-stand workstation on sitting time, and vascular, metabolic and musculoskeletal outcomes in office workers, and to investigate workstation acceptability and feasibility. METHODS: A two-arm, parallel-group, individually randomised controlled trial was conducted in one organisation. Participants were asymptomatic full-time office workers aged ≥18 years. Each participant in the intervention arm had a sit-stand workstation installed on their workplace desk for 8 weeks. Participants in the control arm received no intervention. The primary outcome was workplace sitting time, assessed at 0, 4 and 8 weeks by an ecological momentary assessment diary. Secondary behavioural, cardiometabolic and musculoskeletal outcomes were assessed. Acceptability and feasibility were assessed via questionnaire and interview. ANCOVA and magnitude-based inferences examined intervention effects relative to controls at 4 and 8 weeks. Participants and researchers were not blind to group allocation. RESULTS: Forty-seven participants were randomised (intervention n = 26; control n = 21). Relative to the control group at 8 weeks, the intervention group had a beneficial decrease in sitting time (−80.2 min/8-h workday (95 % CI = −129.0, −31.4); p = 0.002), increase in standing time (72.9 min/8-h workday (21.2, 124.6); p = 0.007) and decrease in total cholesterol (−0.40 mmol/L (−0.79, −0.003); p = 0.049). No harmful changes in musculoskeletal discomfort/pain were observed relative to controls, and beneficial changes in flow-mediated dilation and diastolic blood pressure were observed. Most participants self-reported that the workstation was easy to use and their work-related productivity did not decrease when using the device. Factors that negatively influenced workstation use were workstation design, the social environment, work tasks and habits. CONCLUSION: Short-term use of a feasible sit-stand workstation reduced daily sitting time and led to beneficial improvements in cardiometabolic risk parameters in asymptomatic office workers. These findings imply that if the observed use of the sit-stand workstations continued over a longer duration, sit-stand workstations may have important ramifications for the prevention and reduction of cardiometabolic risk in a large proportion of the working population. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT02496507. BioMed Central 2015-11-19 /pmc/articles/PMC4653846/ /pubmed/26584856 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12889-015-2469-8 Text en © Graves et al. 2015 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated. |
spellingShingle | Research Article E. F. Graves, Lee C. Murphy, Rebecca Shepherd, Sam O. Cabot, Josephine Hopkins, Nicola D. Evaluation of sit-stand workstations in an office setting: a randomised controlled trial |
title | Evaluation of sit-stand workstations in an office setting: a randomised controlled trial |
title_full | Evaluation of sit-stand workstations in an office setting: a randomised controlled trial |
title_fullStr | Evaluation of sit-stand workstations in an office setting: a randomised controlled trial |
title_full_unstemmed | Evaluation of sit-stand workstations in an office setting: a randomised controlled trial |
title_short | Evaluation of sit-stand workstations in an office setting: a randomised controlled trial |
title_sort | evaluation of sit-stand workstations in an office setting: a randomised controlled trial |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4653846/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26584856 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12889-015-2469-8 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT efgraveslee evaluationofsitstandworkstationsinanofficesettingarandomisedcontrolledtrial AT cmurphyrebecca evaluationofsitstandworkstationsinanofficesettingarandomisedcontrolledtrial AT shepherdsamo evaluationofsitstandworkstationsinanofficesettingarandomisedcontrolledtrial AT cabotjosephine evaluationofsitstandworkstationsinanofficesettingarandomisedcontrolledtrial AT hopkinsnicolad evaluationofsitstandworkstationsinanofficesettingarandomisedcontrolledtrial |