Cargando…

Evaluation of sit-stand workstations in an office setting: a randomised controlled trial

BACKGROUND: Excessive sitting time is a risk factor for cardiovascular disease mortality and morbidity independent of physical activity. This aim of this study was to evaluate the impact of a sit-stand workstation on sitting time, and vascular, metabolic and musculoskeletal outcomes in office worker...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: E. F. Graves, Lee, C. Murphy, Rebecca, Shepherd, Sam O., Cabot, Josephine, Hopkins, Nicola D.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2015
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4653846/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26584856
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12889-015-2469-8
_version_ 1782401984853180416
author E. F. Graves, Lee
C. Murphy, Rebecca
Shepherd, Sam O.
Cabot, Josephine
Hopkins, Nicola D.
author_facet E. F. Graves, Lee
C. Murphy, Rebecca
Shepherd, Sam O.
Cabot, Josephine
Hopkins, Nicola D.
author_sort E. F. Graves, Lee
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Excessive sitting time is a risk factor for cardiovascular disease mortality and morbidity independent of physical activity. This aim of this study was to evaluate the impact of a sit-stand workstation on sitting time, and vascular, metabolic and musculoskeletal outcomes in office workers, and to investigate workstation acceptability and feasibility. METHODS: A two-arm, parallel-group, individually randomised controlled trial was conducted in one organisation. Participants were asymptomatic full-time office workers aged ≥18 years. Each participant in the intervention arm had a sit-stand workstation installed on their workplace desk for 8 weeks. Participants in the control arm received no intervention. The primary outcome was workplace sitting time, assessed at 0, 4 and 8 weeks by an ecological momentary assessment diary. Secondary behavioural, cardiometabolic and musculoskeletal outcomes were assessed. Acceptability and feasibility were assessed via questionnaire and interview. ANCOVA and magnitude-based inferences examined intervention effects relative to controls at 4 and 8 weeks. Participants and researchers were not blind to group allocation. RESULTS: Forty-seven participants were randomised (intervention n = 26; control n = 21). Relative to the control group at 8 weeks, the intervention group had a beneficial decrease in sitting time (−80.2 min/8-h workday (95 % CI = −129.0, −31.4); p = 0.002), increase in standing time (72.9 min/8-h workday (21.2, 124.6); p = 0.007) and decrease in total cholesterol (−0.40 mmol/L  (−0.79, −0.003); p = 0.049). No harmful changes in musculoskeletal discomfort/pain were observed relative to controls, and beneficial changes in flow-mediated dilation and diastolic blood pressure were observed. Most participants self-reported that the workstation was easy to use and their work-related productivity did not decrease when using the device. Factors that negatively influenced workstation use were workstation design, the social environment, work tasks and habits. CONCLUSION: Short-term use of a feasible sit-stand workstation reduced daily sitting time and led to beneficial improvements in cardiometabolic risk parameters in asymptomatic office workers. These findings imply that if the observed use of the sit-stand workstations continued over a longer duration, sit-stand workstations may have important ramifications for the prevention and reduction of cardiometabolic risk in a large proportion of the working population. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT02496507.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4653846
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2015
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-46538462015-11-21 Evaluation of sit-stand workstations in an office setting: a randomised controlled trial E. F. Graves, Lee C. Murphy, Rebecca Shepherd, Sam O. Cabot, Josephine Hopkins, Nicola D. BMC Public Health Research Article BACKGROUND: Excessive sitting time is a risk factor for cardiovascular disease mortality and morbidity independent of physical activity. This aim of this study was to evaluate the impact of a sit-stand workstation on sitting time, and vascular, metabolic and musculoskeletal outcomes in office workers, and to investigate workstation acceptability and feasibility. METHODS: A two-arm, parallel-group, individually randomised controlled trial was conducted in one organisation. Participants were asymptomatic full-time office workers aged ≥18 years. Each participant in the intervention arm had a sit-stand workstation installed on their workplace desk for 8 weeks. Participants in the control arm received no intervention. The primary outcome was workplace sitting time, assessed at 0, 4 and 8 weeks by an ecological momentary assessment diary. Secondary behavioural, cardiometabolic and musculoskeletal outcomes were assessed. Acceptability and feasibility were assessed via questionnaire and interview. ANCOVA and magnitude-based inferences examined intervention effects relative to controls at 4 and 8 weeks. Participants and researchers were not blind to group allocation. RESULTS: Forty-seven participants were randomised (intervention n = 26; control n = 21). Relative to the control group at 8 weeks, the intervention group had a beneficial decrease in sitting time (−80.2 min/8-h workday (95 % CI = −129.0, −31.4); p = 0.002), increase in standing time (72.9 min/8-h workday (21.2, 124.6); p = 0.007) and decrease in total cholesterol (−0.40 mmol/L  (−0.79, −0.003); p = 0.049). No harmful changes in musculoskeletal discomfort/pain were observed relative to controls, and beneficial changes in flow-mediated dilation and diastolic blood pressure were observed. Most participants self-reported that the workstation was easy to use and their work-related productivity did not decrease when using the device. Factors that negatively influenced workstation use were workstation design, the social environment, work tasks and habits. CONCLUSION: Short-term use of a feasible sit-stand workstation reduced daily sitting time and led to beneficial improvements in cardiometabolic risk parameters in asymptomatic office workers. These findings imply that if the observed use of the sit-stand workstations continued over a longer duration, sit-stand workstations may have important ramifications for the prevention and reduction of cardiometabolic risk in a large proportion of the working population. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT02496507. BioMed Central 2015-11-19 /pmc/articles/PMC4653846/ /pubmed/26584856 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12889-015-2469-8 Text en © Graves et al. 2015 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Research Article
E. F. Graves, Lee
C. Murphy, Rebecca
Shepherd, Sam O.
Cabot, Josephine
Hopkins, Nicola D.
Evaluation of sit-stand workstations in an office setting: a randomised controlled trial
title Evaluation of sit-stand workstations in an office setting: a randomised controlled trial
title_full Evaluation of sit-stand workstations in an office setting: a randomised controlled trial
title_fullStr Evaluation of sit-stand workstations in an office setting: a randomised controlled trial
title_full_unstemmed Evaluation of sit-stand workstations in an office setting: a randomised controlled trial
title_short Evaluation of sit-stand workstations in an office setting: a randomised controlled trial
title_sort evaluation of sit-stand workstations in an office setting: a randomised controlled trial
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4653846/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26584856
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12889-015-2469-8
work_keys_str_mv AT efgraveslee evaluationofsitstandworkstationsinanofficesettingarandomisedcontrolledtrial
AT cmurphyrebecca evaluationofsitstandworkstationsinanofficesettingarandomisedcontrolledtrial
AT shepherdsamo evaluationofsitstandworkstationsinanofficesettingarandomisedcontrolledtrial
AT cabotjosephine evaluationofsitstandworkstationsinanofficesettingarandomisedcontrolledtrial
AT hopkinsnicolad evaluationofsitstandworkstationsinanofficesettingarandomisedcontrolledtrial