Cargando…

Shoulder Manipulation After Distention Arthrography: Does Audible Cracking Affect Improvement in Adhesive Capsulitis? A Preliminary Study

OBJECTIVE: To investigate whether an audible cracking sound during shoulder manipulation following distention arthrography is clinically significant in patients with adhesive capsulitis of the shoulder. METHODS: A total of 48 patients (31 women, 17 men) with primary adhesive capsulitis of the should...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Choi, Jun Kyu, Son, Seok Beom, Park, Bum Jun, Yang, Seung Nam, Yoon, Joon Shik
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Korean Academy of Rehabilitation Medicine 2015
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4654081/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26605172
http://dx.doi.org/10.5535/arm.2015.39.5.745
_version_ 1782402016122765312
author Choi, Jun Kyu
Son, Seok Beom
Park, Bum Jun
Yang, Seung Nam
Yoon, Joon Shik
author_facet Choi, Jun Kyu
Son, Seok Beom
Park, Bum Jun
Yang, Seung Nam
Yoon, Joon Shik
author_sort Choi, Jun Kyu
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVE: To investigate whether an audible cracking sound during shoulder manipulation following distention arthrography is clinically significant in patients with adhesive capsulitis of the shoulder. METHODS: A total of 48 patients (31 women, 17 men) with primary adhesive capsulitis of the shoulder completed the study. All participants underwent C-arm-guided arthrographic distention of the glenohumeral joint with injections of a corticosteroid and normal saline. After distention, we performed flexion and abduction manipulation of the shoulder. The patients were grouped into sound and non-sound groups based on the presence or absence, respectively, of an audible cracking sound during manipulation. We assessed shoulder pain and disability based on a Numeric Rating Scale (NRS), the Shoulder Pain and Disability Index (SPADI), and passive range of motion (ROM) measurements (flexion, abduction, internal and external rotation) before the procedure and again at 3 weeks and at 6 weeks after the intervention. RESULTS: The patients were divided into two groups: 21 were included in the sound group and 27 in the non-sound group. In both groups, the results of the NRS, SPADI, and ROM assessments showed statistically significant improvements at both 3 and 6 weeks after the procedure. However, there were no significant differences between the two groups except with respect to external rotation at 6 weeks, at which time the sound group showed a significant improvement in external rotation when compared with the non-sound group (p<0.05). CONCLUSION: These findings showed that manipulation following distention arthrography was effective in decreasing pain and increasing shoulder range of motion. In addition, the presence of an audible cracking sound during manipulation, especially on external rotation, was associated with better shoulder range of motion.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4654081
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2015
publisher Korean Academy of Rehabilitation Medicine
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-46540812015-11-24 Shoulder Manipulation After Distention Arthrography: Does Audible Cracking Affect Improvement in Adhesive Capsulitis? A Preliminary Study Choi, Jun Kyu Son, Seok Beom Park, Bum Jun Yang, Seung Nam Yoon, Joon Shik Ann Rehabil Med Original Article OBJECTIVE: To investigate whether an audible cracking sound during shoulder manipulation following distention arthrography is clinically significant in patients with adhesive capsulitis of the shoulder. METHODS: A total of 48 patients (31 women, 17 men) with primary adhesive capsulitis of the shoulder completed the study. All participants underwent C-arm-guided arthrographic distention of the glenohumeral joint with injections of a corticosteroid and normal saline. After distention, we performed flexion and abduction manipulation of the shoulder. The patients were grouped into sound and non-sound groups based on the presence or absence, respectively, of an audible cracking sound during manipulation. We assessed shoulder pain and disability based on a Numeric Rating Scale (NRS), the Shoulder Pain and Disability Index (SPADI), and passive range of motion (ROM) measurements (flexion, abduction, internal and external rotation) before the procedure and again at 3 weeks and at 6 weeks after the intervention. RESULTS: The patients were divided into two groups: 21 were included in the sound group and 27 in the non-sound group. In both groups, the results of the NRS, SPADI, and ROM assessments showed statistically significant improvements at both 3 and 6 weeks after the procedure. However, there were no significant differences between the two groups except with respect to external rotation at 6 weeks, at which time the sound group showed a significant improvement in external rotation when compared with the non-sound group (p<0.05). CONCLUSION: These findings showed that manipulation following distention arthrography was effective in decreasing pain and increasing shoulder range of motion. In addition, the presence of an audible cracking sound during manipulation, especially on external rotation, was associated with better shoulder range of motion. Korean Academy of Rehabilitation Medicine 2015-10 2015-10-26 /pmc/articles/PMC4654081/ /pubmed/26605172 http://dx.doi.org/10.5535/arm.2015.39.5.745 Text en Copyright © 2015 by Korean Academy of Rehabilitation Medicine http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0 This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0) which permits unrestricted noncommercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Original Article
Choi, Jun Kyu
Son, Seok Beom
Park, Bum Jun
Yang, Seung Nam
Yoon, Joon Shik
Shoulder Manipulation After Distention Arthrography: Does Audible Cracking Affect Improvement in Adhesive Capsulitis? A Preliminary Study
title Shoulder Manipulation After Distention Arthrography: Does Audible Cracking Affect Improvement in Adhesive Capsulitis? A Preliminary Study
title_full Shoulder Manipulation After Distention Arthrography: Does Audible Cracking Affect Improvement in Adhesive Capsulitis? A Preliminary Study
title_fullStr Shoulder Manipulation After Distention Arthrography: Does Audible Cracking Affect Improvement in Adhesive Capsulitis? A Preliminary Study
title_full_unstemmed Shoulder Manipulation After Distention Arthrography: Does Audible Cracking Affect Improvement in Adhesive Capsulitis? A Preliminary Study
title_short Shoulder Manipulation After Distention Arthrography: Does Audible Cracking Affect Improvement in Adhesive Capsulitis? A Preliminary Study
title_sort shoulder manipulation after distention arthrography: does audible cracking affect improvement in adhesive capsulitis? a preliminary study
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4654081/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26605172
http://dx.doi.org/10.5535/arm.2015.39.5.745
work_keys_str_mv AT choijunkyu shouldermanipulationafterdistentionarthrographydoesaudiblecrackingaffectimprovementinadhesivecapsulitisapreliminarystudy
AT sonseokbeom shouldermanipulationafterdistentionarthrographydoesaudiblecrackingaffectimprovementinadhesivecapsulitisapreliminarystudy
AT parkbumjun shouldermanipulationafterdistentionarthrographydoesaudiblecrackingaffectimprovementinadhesivecapsulitisapreliminarystudy
AT yangseungnam shouldermanipulationafterdistentionarthrographydoesaudiblecrackingaffectimprovementinadhesivecapsulitisapreliminarystudy
AT yoonjoonshik shouldermanipulationafterdistentionarthrographydoesaudiblecrackingaffectimprovementinadhesivecapsulitisapreliminarystudy