Cargando…
Testing a model of facilitated reflection on network feedback: a mixed method study on integration of rural mental healthcare services for older people
OBJECTIVE: To test a management model of facilitated reflection on network feedback as a means to engage services in problem solving the delivery of integrated primary mental healthcare to older people. DESIGN: Participatory mixed methods case study evaluating the impact of a network management mode...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BMJ Publishing Group
2015
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4654302/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26560057 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2015-008593 |
_version_ | 1782402038173270016 |
---|---|
author | Fuller, Jeffrey Oster, Candice Muir Cochrane, Eimear Dawson, Suzanne Lawn, Sharon Henderson, Julie O'Kane, Deb Gerace, Adam McPhail, Ruth Sparkes, Deb Fuller, Michelle Reed, Richard L |
author_facet | Fuller, Jeffrey Oster, Candice Muir Cochrane, Eimear Dawson, Suzanne Lawn, Sharon Henderson, Julie O'Kane, Deb Gerace, Adam McPhail, Ruth Sparkes, Deb Fuller, Michelle Reed, Richard L |
author_sort | Fuller, Jeffrey |
collection | PubMed |
description | OBJECTIVE: To test a management model of facilitated reflection on network feedback as a means to engage services in problem solving the delivery of integrated primary mental healthcare to older people. DESIGN: Participatory mixed methods case study evaluating the impact of a network management model using organisational network feedback (through social network analysis, key informant interviews and policy review). INTERVENTION: A model of facilitated network reflection using network theory and methods. SETTING: A rural community in South Australia. PARTICIPANTS: 32 staff from 24 services and 12 senior service managers from mental health, primary care and social care services. RESULTS: Health and social care organisations identified that they operated in clustered self-managed networks within sectors, with no overarching purposive older people's mental healthcare network. The model of facilitated reflection revealed service goal and role conflicts. These discussions helped local services to identify as a network, and begin the problem-solving communication and referral links. A Governance Group assisted this process. Barriers to integrated servicing through a network included service funding tied to performance of direct care tasks and the lack of a clear lead network administration organisation. CONCLUSIONS: A model of facilitated reflection helped organisations to identify as a network, but revealed sensitivity about organisational roles and goals, which demonstrated that conflict should be expected. Networked servicing needed a neutral network administration organisation with cross-sectoral credibility, a mandate and the resources to monitor the network, to deal with conflict, negotiate commitment among the service managers, and provide opportunities for different sectors to meet and problem solve. This requires consistency and sustained intersectoral policies that include strategies and funding to facilitate and maintain health and social care networks in rural communities. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-4654302 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2015 |
publisher | BMJ Publishing Group |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-46543022015-12-02 Testing a model of facilitated reflection on network feedback: a mixed method study on integration of rural mental healthcare services for older people Fuller, Jeffrey Oster, Candice Muir Cochrane, Eimear Dawson, Suzanne Lawn, Sharon Henderson, Julie O'Kane, Deb Gerace, Adam McPhail, Ruth Sparkes, Deb Fuller, Michelle Reed, Richard L BMJ Open Health Services Research OBJECTIVE: To test a management model of facilitated reflection on network feedback as a means to engage services in problem solving the delivery of integrated primary mental healthcare to older people. DESIGN: Participatory mixed methods case study evaluating the impact of a network management model using organisational network feedback (through social network analysis, key informant interviews and policy review). INTERVENTION: A model of facilitated network reflection using network theory and methods. SETTING: A rural community in South Australia. PARTICIPANTS: 32 staff from 24 services and 12 senior service managers from mental health, primary care and social care services. RESULTS: Health and social care organisations identified that they operated in clustered self-managed networks within sectors, with no overarching purposive older people's mental healthcare network. The model of facilitated reflection revealed service goal and role conflicts. These discussions helped local services to identify as a network, and begin the problem-solving communication and referral links. A Governance Group assisted this process. Barriers to integrated servicing through a network included service funding tied to performance of direct care tasks and the lack of a clear lead network administration organisation. CONCLUSIONS: A model of facilitated reflection helped organisations to identify as a network, but revealed sensitivity about organisational roles and goals, which demonstrated that conflict should be expected. Networked servicing needed a neutral network administration organisation with cross-sectoral credibility, a mandate and the resources to monitor the network, to deal with conflict, negotiate commitment among the service managers, and provide opportunities for different sectors to meet and problem solve. This requires consistency and sustained intersectoral policies that include strategies and funding to facilitate and maintain health and social care networks in rural communities. BMJ Publishing Group 2015-11-11 /pmc/articles/PMC4654302/ /pubmed/26560057 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2015-008593 Text en Published by the BMJ Publishing Group Limited. For permission to use (where not already granted under a licence) please go to http://www.bmj.com/company/products-services/rights-and-licensing/ This is an Open Access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ |
spellingShingle | Health Services Research Fuller, Jeffrey Oster, Candice Muir Cochrane, Eimear Dawson, Suzanne Lawn, Sharon Henderson, Julie O'Kane, Deb Gerace, Adam McPhail, Ruth Sparkes, Deb Fuller, Michelle Reed, Richard L Testing a model of facilitated reflection on network feedback: a mixed method study on integration of rural mental healthcare services for older people |
title | Testing a model of facilitated reflection on network feedback: a mixed method study on integration of rural mental healthcare services for older people |
title_full | Testing a model of facilitated reflection on network feedback: a mixed method study on integration of rural mental healthcare services for older people |
title_fullStr | Testing a model of facilitated reflection on network feedback: a mixed method study on integration of rural mental healthcare services for older people |
title_full_unstemmed | Testing a model of facilitated reflection on network feedback: a mixed method study on integration of rural mental healthcare services for older people |
title_short | Testing a model of facilitated reflection on network feedback: a mixed method study on integration of rural mental healthcare services for older people |
title_sort | testing a model of facilitated reflection on network feedback: a mixed method study on integration of rural mental healthcare services for older people |
topic | Health Services Research |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4654302/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26560057 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2015-008593 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT fullerjeffrey testingamodeloffacilitatedreflectiononnetworkfeedbackamixedmethodstudyonintegrationofruralmentalhealthcareservicesforolderpeople AT ostercandice testingamodeloffacilitatedreflectiononnetworkfeedbackamixedmethodstudyonintegrationofruralmentalhealthcareservicesforolderpeople AT muircochraneeimear testingamodeloffacilitatedreflectiononnetworkfeedbackamixedmethodstudyonintegrationofruralmentalhealthcareservicesforolderpeople AT dawsonsuzanne testingamodeloffacilitatedreflectiononnetworkfeedbackamixedmethodstudyonintegrationofruralmentalhealthcareservicesforolderpeople AT lawnsharon testingamodeloffacilitatedreflectiononnetworkfeedbackamixedmethodstudyonintegrationofruralmentalhealthcareservicesforolderpeople AT hendersonjulie testingamodeloffacilitatedreflectiononnetworkfeedbackamixedmethodstudyonintegrationofruralmentalhealthcareservicesforolderpeople AT okanedeb testingamodeloffacilitatedreflectiononnetworkfeedbackamixedmethodstudyonintegrationofruralmentalhealthcareservicesforolderpeople AT geraceadam testingamodeloffacilitatedreflectiononnetworkfeedbackamixedmethodstudyonintegrationofruralmentalhealthcareservicesforolderpeople AT mcphailruth testingamodeloffacilitatedreflectiononnetworkfeedbackamixedmethodstudyonintegrationofruralmentalhealthcareservicesforolderpeople AT sparkesdeb testingamodeloffacilitatedreflectiononnetworkfeedbackamixedmethodstudyonintegrationofruralmentalhealthcareservicesforolderpeople AT fullermichelle testingamodeloffacilitatedreflectiononnetworkfeedbackamixedmethodstudyonintegrationofruralmentalhealthcareservicesforolderpeople AT reedrichardl testingamodeloffacilitatedreflectiononnetworkfeedbackamixedmethodstudyonintegrationofruralmentalhealthcareservicesforolderpeople |