Cargando…

Testing a model of facilitated reflection on network feedback: a mixed method study on integration of rural mental healthcare services for older people

OBJECTIVE: To test a management model of facilitated reflection on network feedback as a means to engage services in problem solving the delivery of integrated primary mental healthcare to older people. DESIGN: Participatory mixed methods case study evaluating the impact of a network management mode...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Fuller, Jeffrey, Oster, Candice, Muir Cochrane, Eimear, Dawson, Suzanne, Lawn, Sharon, Henderson, Julie, O'Kane, Deb, Gerace, Adam, McPhail, Ruth, Sparkes, Deb, Fuller, Michelle, Reed, Richard L
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BMJ Publishing Group 2015
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4654302/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26560057
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2015-008593
_version_ 1782402038173270016
author Fuller, Jeffrey
Oster, Candice
Muir Cochrane, Eimear
Dawson, Suzanne
Lawn, Sharon
Henderson, Julie
O'Kane, Deb
Gerace, Adam
McPhail, Ruth
Sparkes, Deb
Fuller, Michelle
Reed, Richard L
author_facet Fuller, Jeffrey
Oster, Candice
Muir Cochrane, Eimear
Dawson, Suzanne
Lawn, Sharon
Henderson, Julie
O'Kane, Deb
Gerace, Adam
McPhail, Ruth
Sparkes, Deb
Fuller, Michelle
Reed, Richard L
author_sort Fuller, Jeffrey
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVE: To test a management model of facilitated reflection on network feedback as a means to engage services in problem solving the delivery of integrated primary mental healthcare to older people. DESIGN: Participatory mixed methods case study evaluating the impact of a network management model using organisational network feedback (through social network analysis, key informant interviews and policy review). INTERVENTION: A model of facilitated network reflection using network theory and methods. SETTING: A rural community in South Australia. PARTICIPANTS: 32 staff from 24 services and 12 senior service managers from mental health, primary care and social care services. RESULTS: Health and social care organisations identified that they operated in clustered self-managed networks within sectors, with no overarching purposive older people's mental healthcare network. The model of facilitated reflection revealed service goal and role conflicts. These discussions helped local services to identify as a network, and begin the problem-solving communication and referral links. A Governance Group assisted this process. Barriers to integrated servicing through a network included service funding tied to performance of direct care tasks and the lack of a clear lead network administration organisation. CONCLUSIONS: A model of facilitated reflection helped organisations to identify as a network, but revealed sensitivity about organisational roles and goals, which demonstrated that conflict should be expected. Networked servicing needed a neutral network administration organisation with cross-sectoral credibility, a mandate and the resources to monitor the network, to deal with conflict, negotiate commitment among the service managers, and provide opportunities for different sectors to meet and problem solve. This requires consistency and sustained intersectoral policies that include strategies and funding to facilitate and maintain health and social care networks in rural communities.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4654302
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2015
publisher BMJ Publishing Group
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-46543022015-12-02 Testing a model of facilitated reflection on network feedback: a mixed method study on integration of rural mental healthcare services for older people Fuller, Jeffrey Oster, Candice Muir Cochrane, Eimear Dawson, Suzanne Lawn, Sharon Henderson, Julie O'Kane, Deb Gerace, Adam McPhail, Ruth Sparkes, Deb Fuller, Michelle Reed, Richard L BMJ Open Health Services Research OBJECTIVE: To test a management model of facilitated reflection on network feedback as a means to engage services in problem solving the delivery of integrated primary mental healthcare to older people. DESIGN: Participatory mixed methods case study evaluating the impact of a network management model using organisational network feedback (through social network analysis, key informant interviews and policy review). INTERVENTION: A model of facilitated network reflection using network theory and methods. SETTING: A rural community in South Australia. PARTICIPANTS: 32 staff from 24 services and 12 senior service managers from mental health, primary care and social care services. RESULTS: Health and social care organisations identified that they operated in clustered self-managed networks within sectors, with no overarching purposive older people's mental healthcare network. The model of facilitated reflection revealed service goal and role conflicts. These discussions helped local services to identify as a network, and begin the problem-solving communication and referral links. A Governance Group assisted this process. Barriers to integrated servicing through a network included service funding tied to performance of direct care tasks and the lack of a clear lead network administration organisation. CONCLUSIONS: A model of facilitated reflection helped organisations to identify as a network, but revealed sensitivity about organisational roles and goals, which demonstrated that conflict should be expected. Networked servicing needed a neutral network administration organisation with cross-sectoral credibility, a mandate and the resources to monitor the network, to deal with conflict, negotiate commitment among the service managers, and provide opportunities for different sectors to meet and problem solve. This requires consistency and sustained intersectoral policies that include strategies and funding to facilitate and maintain health and social care networks in rural communities. BMJ Publishing Group 2015-11-11 /pmc/articles/PMC4654302/ /pubmed/26560057 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2015-008593 Text en Published by the BMJ Publishing Group Limited. For permission to use (where not already granted under a licence) please go to http://www.bmj.com/company/products-services/rights-and-licensing/ This is an Open Access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/
spellingShingle Health Services Research
Fuller, Jeffrey
Oster, Candice
Muir Cochrane, Eimear
Dawson, Suzanne
Lawn, Sharon
Henderson, Julie
O'Kane, Deb
Gerace, Adam
McPhail, Ruth
Sparkes, Deb
Fuller, Michelle
Reed, Richard L
Testing a model of facilitated reflection on network feedback: a mixed method study on integration of rural mental healthcare services for older people
title Testing a model of facilitated reflection on network feedback: a mixed method study on integration of rural mental healthcare services for older people
title_full Testing a model of facilitated reflection on network feedback: a mixed method study on integration of rural mental healthcare services for older people
title_fullStr Testing a model of facilitated reflection on network feedback: a mixed method study on integration of rural mental healthcare services for older people
title_full_unstemmed Testing a model of facilitated reflection on network feedback: a mixed method study on integration of rural mental healthcare services for older people
title_short Testing a model of facilitated reflection on network feedback: a mixed method study on integration of rural mental healthcare services for older people
title_sort testing a model of facilitated reflection on network feedback: a mixed method study on integration of rural mental healthcare services for older people
topic Health Services Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4654302/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26560057
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2015-008593
work_keys_str_mv AT fullerjeffrey testingamodeloffacilitatedreflectiononnetworkfeedbackamixedmethodstudyonintegrationofruralmentalhealthcareservicesforolderpeople
AT ostercandice testingamodeloffacilitatedreflectiononnetworkfeedbackamixedmethodstudyonintegrationofruralmentalhealthcareservicesforolderpeople
AT muircochraneeimear testingamodeloffacilitatedreflectiononnetworkfeedbackamixedmethodstudyonintegrationofruralmentalhealthcareservicesforolderpeople
AT dawsonsuzanne testingamodeloffacilitatedreflectiononnetworkfeedbackamixedmethodstudyonintegrationofruralmentalhealthcareservicesforolderpeople
AT lawnsharon testingamodeloffacilitatedreflectiononnetworkfeedbackamixedmethodstudyonintegrationofruralmentalhealthcareservicesforolderpeople
AT hendersonjulie testingamodeloffacilitatedreflectiononnetworkfeedbackamixedmethodstudyonintegrationofruralmentalhealthcareservicesforolderpeople
AT okanedeb testingamodeloffacilitatedreflectiononnetworkfeedbackamixedmethodstudyonintegrationofruralmentalhealthcareservicesforolderpeople
AT geraceadam testingamodeloffacilitatedreflectiononnetworkfeedbackamixedmethodstudyonintegrationofruralmentalhealthcareservicesforolderpeople
AT mcphailruth testingamodeloffacilitatedreflectiononnetworkfeedbackamixedmethodstudyonintegrationofruralmentalhealthcareservicesforolderpeople
AT sparkesdeb testingamodeloffacilitatedreflectiononnetworkfeedbackamixedmethodstudyonintegrationofruralmentalhealthcareservicesforolderpeople
AT fullermichelle testingamodeloffacilitatedreflectiononnetworkfeedbackamixedmethodstudyonintegrationofruralmentalhealthcareservicesforolderpeople
AT reedrichardl testingamodeloffacilitatedreflectiononnetworkfeedbackamixedmethodstudyonintegrationofruralmentalhealthcareservicesforolderpeople