Cargando…

Informed shared decision-making programme on the prevention of myocardial infarction in type 2 diabetes: a randomised controlled trial

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate an informed shared decision-making programme (ISDM-P) for people with type 2 diabetes under high fidelity conditions. DESIGN: Randomised, single-blinded trial with sham control intervention and follow-up of 6 months. SETTING: Single-centre diabetes clinic providing care accord...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Buhse, Susanne, Mühlhauser, Ingrid, Heller, Tabitha, Kuniss, Nadine, Müller, Ulrich Alfons, Kasper, Jürgen, Lehmann, Thomas, Lenz, Matthias
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BMJ Publishing Group 2015
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4654390/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26567256
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2015-009116
_version_ 1782402049793589248
author Buhse, Susanne
Mühlhauser, Ingrid
Heller, Tabitha
Kuniss, Nadine
Müller, Ulrich Alfons
Kasper, Jürgen
Lehmann, Thomas
Lenz, Matthias
author_facet Buhse, Susanne
Mühlhauser, Ingrid
Heller, Tabitha
Kuniss, Nadine
Müller, Ulrich Alfons
Kasper, Jürgen
Lehmann, Thomas
Lenz, Matthias
author_sort Buhse, Susanne
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVE: To evaluate an informed shared decision-making programme (ISDM-P) for people with type 2 diabetes under high fidelity conditions. DESIGN: Randomised, single-blinded trial with sham control intervention and follow-up of 6 months. SETTING: Single-centre diabetes clinic providing care according to the national disease management programme in Germany. PARTICIPANTS: 154 people with type 2 diabetes without diagnosis of ischaemic heart disease or stroke. INTERVENTIONS: The ISDM-P is executed by diabetes educators. Core component is a patient decision aid on the prevention of myocardial infarction supplemented by a 90 min group teaching session. The structurally equivalent control intervention addresses stress issues. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Primary outcome was risk comprehension, including realistic expectations about benefits and harms of interventions. It was assessed by a 12-item questionnaire after the teaching session when patients set and prioritise their treatment goals. Key secondary outcome was adherence to treatment goals, operationalised as achievement of individual goals and medication uptake. ISDM-P teaching sessions were video-taped to monitor intervention fidelity. RESULTS: 72 of 77 ISDM-P and 71 of 77 control patients completed the questionnaire (score 0–12). ISDM-P patients achieved higher levels of risk comprehension, mean score 8.25 vs 2.62, difference 5.63 (95% CI 4.82 to 6.44), and realistic expectations (score 0–6), 4.51 vs 0.85, 3.67 (3.23 to 4.11). More ISDM-P patients wished to take statins, 59.2% vs 30.4%, 28.7% (12.9% to 44.5%); more prioritised blood pressure control, 51.4% vs 25.7%, and fewer intensive glucose control, 33.3% vs 60%, p=0.002. More ISDM-P patients achieved their glycated haemoglobin goals, 95.8% vs 85.7%, 10.1% (0.6% to 19.5%). Achievement of prioritised goals and medication uptake were comparable between groups. CONCLUSIONS: The ISDM-P on preventive measures in type 2 diabetes was effective under high fidelity conditions. Involvement of diabetes educators may facilitate implementation of the informed shared decision-making. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: ISRCTN84636255.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4654390
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2015
publisher BMJ Publishing Group
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-46543902015-12-02 Informed shared decision-making programme on the prevention of myocardial infarction in type 2 diabetes: a randomised controlled trial Buhse, Susanne Mühlhauser, Ingrid Heller, Tabitha Kuniss, Nadine Müller, Ulrich Alfons Kasper, Jürgen Lehmann, Thomas Lenz, Matthias BMJ Open Evidence Based Practice OBJECTIVE: To evaluate an informed shared decision-making programme (ISDM-P) for people with type 2 diabetes under high fidelity conditions. DESIGN: Randomised, single-blinded trial with sham control intervention and follow-up of 6 months. SETTING: Single-centre diabetes clinic providing care according to the national disease management programme in Germany. PARTICIPANTS: 154 people with type 2 diabetes without diagnosis of ischaemic heart disease or stroke. INTERVENTIONS: The ISDM-P is executed by diabetes educators. Core component is a patient decision aid on the prevention of myocardial infarction supplemented by a 90 min group teaching session. The structurally equivalent control intervention addresses stress issues. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Primary outcome was risk comprehension, including realistic expectations about benefits and harms of interventions. It was assessed by a 12-item questionnaire after the teaching session when patients set and prioritise their treatment goals. Key secondary outcome was adherence to treatment goals, operationalised as achievement of individual goals and medication uptake. ISDM-P teaching sessions were video-taped to monitor intervention fidelity. RESULTS: 72 of 77 ISDM-P and 71 of 77 control patients completed the questionnaire (score 0–12). ISDM-P patients achieved higher levels of risk comprehension, mean score 8.25 vs 2.62, difference 5.63 (95% CI 4.82 to 6.44), and realistic expectations (score 0–6), 4.51 vs 0.85, 3.67 (3.23 to 4.11). More ISDM-P patients wished to take statins, 59.2% vs 30.4%, 28.7% (12.9% to 44.5%); more prioritised blood pressure control, 51.4% vs 25.7%, and fewer intensive glucose control, 33.3% vs 60%, p=0.002. More ISDM-P patients achieved their glycated haemoglobin goals, 95.8% vs 85.7%, 10.1% (0.6% to 19.5%). Achievement of prioritised goals and medication uptake were comparable between groups. CONCLUSIONS: The ISDM-P on preventive measures in type 2 diabetes was effective under high fidelity conditions. Involvement of diabetes educators may facilitate implementation of the informed shared decision-making. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: ISRCTN84636255. BMJ Publishing Group 2015-11-13 /pmc/articles/PMC4654390/ /pubmed/26567256 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2015-009116 Text en Published by the BMJ Publishing Group Limited. For permission to use (where not already granted under a licence) please go to http://www.bmj.com/company/products-services/rights-and-licensing/ This is an Open Access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/
spellingShingle Evidence Based Practice
Buhse, Susanne
Mühlhauser, Ingrid
Heller, Tabitha
Kuniss, Nadine
Müller, Ulrich Alfons
Kasper, Jürgen
Lehmann, Thomas
Lenz, Matthias
Informed shared decision-making programme on the prevention of myocardial infarction in type 2 diabetes: a randomised controlled trial
title Informed shared decision-making programme on the prevention of myocardial infarction in type 2 diabetes: a randomised controlled trial
title_full Informed shared decision-making programme on the prevention of myocardial infarction in type 2 diabetes: a randomised controlled trial
title_fullStr Informed shared decision-making programme on the prevention of myocardial infarction in type 2 diabetes: a randomised controlled trial
title_full_unstemmed Informed shared decision-making programme on the prevention of myocardial infarction in type 2 diabetes: a randomised controlled trial
title_short Informed shared decision-making programme on the prevention of myocardial infarction in type 2 diabetes: a randomised controlled trial
title_sort informed shared decision-making programme on the prevention of myocardial infarction in type 2 diabetes: a randomised controlled trial
topic Evidence Based Practice
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4654390/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26567256
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2015-009116
work_keys_str_mv AT buhsesusanne informedshareddecisionmakingprogrammeonthepreventionofmyocardialinfarctionintype2diabetesarandomisedcontrolledtrial
AT muhlhauseringrid informedshareddecisionmakingprogrammeonthepreventionofmyocardialinfarctionintype2diabetesarandomisedcontrolledtrial
AT hellertabitha informedshareddecisionmakingprogrammeonthepreventionofmyocardialinfarctionintype2diabetesarandomisedcontrolledtrial
AT kunissnadine informedshareddecisionmakingprogrammeonthepreventionofmyocardialinfarctionintype2diabetesarandomisedcontrolledtrial
AT mullerulrichalfons informedshareddecisionmakingprogrammeonthepreventionofmyocardialinfarctionintype2diabetesarandomisedcontrolledtrial
AT kasperjurgen informedshareddecisionmakingprogrammeonthepreventionofmyocardialinfarctionintype2diabetesarandomisedcontrolledtrial
AT lehmannthomas informedshareddecisionmakingprogrammeonthepreventionofmyocardialinfarctionintype2diabetesarandomisedcontrolledtrial
AT lenzmatthias informedshareddecisionmakingprogrammeonthepreventionofmyocardialinfarctionintype2diabetesarandomisedcontrolledtrial