Cargando…
A citation-based, author- and age-normalized, logarithmic index for evaluation of individual researchers independently of publication counts
The use of citation metrics for evaluation of individual researchers has dramatically increased over the last decade. However, currently existing indices either are based on misleading premises or are cumbersome to implement. This leads to poor assessment of researchers and creates dangerous trends...
Autores principales: | Belikov, Aleksey V., Belikov, Vitaly V. |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
F1000Research
2015
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4654436/ http://dx.doi.org/10.12688/f1000research.7070.1 |
Ejemplares similares
-
The Pagerank-Index: Going beyond Citation Counts in Quantifying Scientific Impact of Researchers
por: Senanayake, Upul, et al.
Publicado: (2015) -
Count highly-cited papers instead of papers with h citations: use normalized citation counts and compare “like with like”!
por: Bornmann, Lutz, et al.
Publicado: (2018) -
Counting publications and citations is not just irrelevant: it is an incentive that subverts the impact of clinical research
por: Büttner, Fionn, et al.
Publicado: (2021) -
On the relationship between citations of publication output and Hirsch index h of authors: conceptualization of tapered Hirsch index h(T), circular citation area radius R and citation acceleration a
por: Sangwal, Keshra
Publicado: (2012) -
In health research publications, the number of authors is strongly associated with collective self-citations but less so with citations by others
por: Jaksic, Cyril, et al.
Publicado: (2023)