Cargando…

Benefits for Voice Learning Caused by Concurrent Faces Develop over Time

Recognition of personally familiar voices benefits from the concurrent presentation of the corresponding speakers’ faces. This effect of audiovisual integration is most pronounced for voices combined with dynamic articulating faces. However, it is unclear if learning unfamiliar voices also benefits...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Zäske, Romi, Mühl, Constanze, Schweinberger, Stefan R.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Public Library of Science 2015
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4654504/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26588847
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0143151
_version_ 1782402065309368320
author Zäske, Romi
Mühl, Constanze
Schweinberger, Stefan R.
author_facet Zäske, Romi
Mühl, Constanze
Schweinberger, Stefan R.
author_sort Zäske, Romi
collection PubMed
description Recognition of personally familiar voices benefits from the concurrent presentation of the corresponding speakers’ faces. This effect of audiovisual integration is most pronounced for voices combined with dynamic articulating faces. However, it is unclear if learning unfamiliar voices also benefits from audiovisual face-voice integration or, alternatively, is hampered by attentional capture of faces, i.e., “face-overshadowing”. In six study-test cycles we compared the recognition of newly-learned voices following unimodal voice learning vs. bimodal face-voice learning with either static (Exp. 1) or dynamic articulating faces (Exp. 2). Voice recognition accuracies significantly increased for bimodal learning across study-test cycles while remaining stable for unimodal learning, as reflected in numerical costs of bimodal relative to unimodal voice learning in the first two study-test cycles and benefits in the last two cycles. This was independent of whether faces were static images (Exp. 1) or dynamic videos (Exp. 2). In both experiments, slower reaction times to voices previously studied with faces compared to voices only may result from visual search for faces during memory retrieval. A general decrease of reaction times across study-test cycles suggests facilitated recognition with more speaker repetitions. Overall, our data suggest two simultaneous and opposing mechanisms during bimodal face-voice learning: while attentional capture of faces may initially impede voice learning, audiovisual integration may facilitate it thereafter.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4654504
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2015
publisher Public Library of Science
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-46545042015-11-25 Benefits for Voice Learning Caused by Concurrent Faces Develop over Time Zäske, Romi Mühl, Constanze Schweinberger, Stefan R. PLoS One Research Article Recognition of personally familiar voices benefits from the concurrent presentation of the corresponding speakers’ faces. This effect of audiovisual integration is most pronounced for voices combined with dynamic articulating faces. However, it is unclear if learning unfamiliar voices also benefits from audiovisual face-voice integration or, alternatively, is hampered by attentional capture of faces, i.e., “face-overshadowing”. In six study-test cycles we compared the recognition of newly-learned voices following unimodal voice learning vs. bimodal face-voice learning with either static (Exp. 1) or dynamic articulating faces (Exp. 2). Voice recognition accuracies significantly increased for bimodal learning across study-test cycles while remaining stable for unimodal learning, as reflected in numerical costs of bimodal relative to unimodal voice learning in the first two study-test cycles and benefits in the last two cycles. This was independent of whether faces were static images (Exp. 1) or dynamic videos (Exp. 2). In both experiments, slower reaction times to voices previously studied with faces compared to voices only may result from visual search for faces during memory retrieval. A general decrease of reaction times across study-test cycles suggests facilitated recognition with more speaker repetitions. Overall, our data suggest two simultaneous and opposing mechanisms during bimodal face-voice learning: while attentional capture of faces may initially impede voice learning, audiovisual integration may facilitate it thereafter. Public Library of Science 2015-11-20 /pmc/articles/PMC4654504/ /pubmed/26588847 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0143151 Text en © 2015 Zäske et al http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are properly credited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Zäske, Romi
Mühl, Constanze
Schweinberger, Stefan R.
Benefits for Voice Learning Caused by Concurrent Faces Develop over Time
title Benefits for Voice Learning Caused by Concurrent Faces Develop over Time
title_full Benefits for Voice Learning Caused by Concurrent Faces Develop over Time
title_fullStr Benefits for Voice Learning Caused by Concurrent Faces Develop over Time
title_full_unstemmed Benefits for Voice Learning Caused by Concurrent Faces Develop over Time
title_short Benefits for Voice Learning Caused by Concurrent Faces Develop over Time
title_sort benefits for voice learning caused by concurrent faces develop over time
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4654504/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26588847
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0143151
work_keys_str_mv AT zaskeromi benefitsforvoicelearningcausedbyconcurrentfacesdevelopovertime
AT muhlconstanze benefitsforvoicelearningcausedbyconcurrentfacesdevelopovertime
AT schweinbergerstefanr benefitsforvoicelearningcausedbyconcurrentfacesdevelopovertime