Cargando…

The Effects of Renal Denervation on Renal Hemodynamics and Renal Vasculature in a Porcine Model

RATIONALE: Recently, the efficacy of renal denervation (RDN) has been debated. It is discussed whether RDN is able to adequately target the renal nerves. OBJECTIVE: We aimed to investigate how effective RDN was by means of functional hemodynamic measurements and nerve damage on histology. METHODS AN...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Verloop, Willemien L., Hubens, Lisette E. G., Spiering, Wilko, Doevendans, Pieter A., Goldschmeding, Roel, Bleys, Ronald L. A. W., Voskuil, Michiel
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Public Library of Science 2015
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4654519/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26587981
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0141609
Descripción
Sumario:RATIONALE: Recently, the efficacy of renal denervation (RDN) has been debated. It is discussed whether RDN is able to adequately target the renal nerves. OBJECTIVE: We aimed to investigate how effective RDN was by means of functional hemodynamic measurements and nerve damage on histology. METHODS AND RESULTS: We performed hemodynamic measurements in both renal arteries of healthy pigs using a Doppler flow and pressure wire. Subsequently unilateral denervation was performed, followed by repeated bilateral hemodynamic measurements. Pigs were terminated directly after RDN or were followed for 3 weeks or 3 months after the procedure. After termination, both treated and control arteries were prepared for histology to evaluate vascular damage and nerve damage. Directly after RDN, resting renal blood flow tended to increase by 29±67% (P = 0.01). In contrast, renal resistance reserve increased from 1.74 (1.28) to 1.88 (1.17) (P = 0.02) during follow-up. Vascular histopathology showed that most nerves around the treated arteries were located outside the lesion areas (8±7 out of 55±25 (14%) nerves per pig were observed within a lesion area). Subsequently, a correlation was noted between a more impaired adventitia and a reduction in renal resistance reserve (β: -0.33; P = 0.05) at three weeks of follow-up. CONCLUSION: Only a small minority of renal nerves was targeted after RDN. Furthermore, more severe adventitial damage was related to a reduction in renal resistance in the treated arteries at follow-up. These hemodynamic and histological observations may indicate that RDN did not sufficiently target the renal nerves. Potentially, this may explain the significant spread in the response after RDN.