Cargando…

Biofield Physiology: A Framework for an Emerging Discipline

Biofield physiology is proposed as an overarching descriptor for the electromagnetic, biophotonic, and other types of spatially-distributed fields that living systems generate and respond to as integral aspects of cellular, tissue, and whole organism self-regulation and organization. Medical physiol...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Hammerschlag, Richard, Levin, Michael, McCraty, Rollin, Bat, Namuun, Ives, John A., Lutgendorf, Susan K., Oschman, James L.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Global Advances in Health and Medicine 2015
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4654783/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26665040
http://dx.doi.org/10.7453/gahmj.2015.015.suppl
_version_ 1782402098273452032
author Hammerschlag, Richard
Levin, Michael
McCraty, Rollin
Bat, Namuun
Ives, John A.
Lutgendorf, Susan K.
Oschman, James L.
author_facet Hammerschlag, Richard
Levin, Michael
McCraty, Rollin
Bat, Namuun
Ives, John A.
Lutgendorf, Susan K.
Oschman, James L.
author_sort Hammerschlag, Richard
collection PubMed
description Biofield physiology is proposed as an overarching descriptor for the electromagnetic, biophotonic, and other types of spatially-distributed fields that living systems generate and respond to as integral aspects of cellular, tissue, and whole organism self-regulation and organization. Medical physiology, cell biology, and biophysics provide the framework within which evidence for biofields, their proposed receptors, and functions is presented. As such, biofields can be viewed as affecting physiological regulatory systems in a manner that complements the more familiar molecular-based mechanisms. Examples of clinically relevant biofields are the electrical and magnetic fields generated by arrays of heart cells and neurons that are detected, respectively, as electrocardiograms (ECGs) or magnetocardiograms (MCGs) and electroencephalograms (EEGs) or magnetoencephalograms (MEGs). At a basic physiology level, electromagnetic activity of neural assemblies appears to modulate neuronal synchronization and circadian rhythmicity. Numerous nonneural electrical fields have been detected and analyzed, including those arising from patterns of resting membrane potentials that guide development and regeneration, and from slowly-varying transepithelial direct current fields that initiate cellular responses to tissue damage. Another biofield phenomenon is the coherent, ultraweak photon emissions (UPE), detected from cell cultures and from the body surface. A physiological role for biophotons is consistent with observations that fluctuations in UPE correlate with cerebral blood flow, cerebral energy metabolism, and EEG activity. Biofield receptors are reviewed in 3 categories: molecular-level receptors, charge flux sites, and endogenously generated electric or electromagnetic fields. In summary, sufficient evidence has accrued to consider biofield physiology as a viable scientific discipline. Directions for future research are proposed.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4654783
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2015
publisher Global Advances in Health and Medicine
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-46547832016-01-08 Biofield Physiology: A Framework for an Emerging Discipline Hammerschlag, Richard Levin, Michael McCraty, Rollin Bat, Namuun Ives, John A. Lutgendorf, Susan K. Oschman, James L. Glob Adv Health Med Review Article Biofield physiology is proposed as an overarching descriptor for the electromagnetic, biophotonic, and other types of spatially-distributed fields that living systems generate and respond to as integral aspects of cellular, tissue, and whole organism self-regulation and organization. Medical physiology, cell biology, and biophysics provide the framework within which evidence for biofields, their proposed receptors, and functions is presented. As such, biofields can be viewed as affecting physiological regulatory systems in a manner that complements the more familiar molecular-based mechanisms. Examples of clinically relevant biofields are the electrical and magnetic fields generated by arrays of heart cells and neurons that are detected, respectively, as electrocardiograms (ECGs) or magnetocardiograms (MCGs) and electroencephalograms (EEGs) or magnetoencephalograms (MEGs). At a basic physiology level, electromagnetic activity of neural assemblies appears to modulate neuronal synchronization and circadian rhythmicity. Numerous nonneural electrical fields have been detected and analyzed, including those arising from patterns of resting membrane potentials that guide development and regeneration, and from slowly-varying transepithelial direct current fields that initiate cellular responses to tissue damage. Another biofield phenomenon is the coherent, ultraweak photon emissions (UPE), detected from cell cultures and from the body surface. A physiological role for biophotons is consistent with observations that fluctuations in UPE correlate with cerebral blood flow, cerebral energy metabolism, and EEG activity. Biofield receptors are reviewed in 3 categories: molecular-level receptors, charge flux sites, and endogenously generated electric or electromagnetic fields. In summary, sufficient evidence has accrued to consider biofield physiology as a viable scientific discipline. Directions for future research are proposed. Global Advances in Health and Medicine 2015-11 2015-11-01 /pmc/articles/PMC4654783/ /pubmed/26665040 http://dx.doi.org/10.7453/gahmj.2015.015.suppl Text en © 2015 GAHM LLC. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-Non Commercial- No Derivative 3.0 License, which permits rights to copy, distribute and transmit the work for noncommercial purposes only, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Review Article
Hammerschlag, Richard
Levin, Michael
McCraty, Rollin
Bat, Namuun
Ives, John A.
Lutgendorf, Susan K.
Oschman, James L.
Biofield Physiology: A Framework for an Emerging Discipline
title Biofield Physiology: A Framework for an Emerging Discipline
title_full Biofield Physiology: A Framework for an Emerging Discipline
title_fullStr Biofield Physiology: A Framework for an Emerging Discipline
title_full_unstemmed Biofield Physiology: A Framework for an Emerging Discipline
title_short Biofield Physiology: A Framework for an Emerging Discipline
title_sort biofield physiology: a framework for an emerging discipline
topic Review Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4654783/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26665040
http://dx.doi.org/10.7453/gahmj.2015.015.suppl
work_keys_str_mv AT hammerschlagrichard biofieldphysiologyaframeworkforanemergingdiscipline
AT levinmichael biofieldphysiologyaframeworkforanemergingdiscipline
AT mccratyrollin biofieldphysiologyaframeworkforanemergingdiscipline
AT batnamuun biofieldphysiologyaframeworkforanemergingdiscipline
AT ivesjohna biofieldphysiologyaframeworkforanemergingdiscipline
AT lutgendorfsusank biofieldphysiologyaframeworkforanemergingdiscipline
AT oschmanjamesl biofieldphysiologyaframeworkforanemergingdiscipline