Cargando…
A retrospective comparison of false negative skin test rates in penicillin allergy, using pencilloyl-poly-lysine and minor determinants or Penicillin G, followed by open challenge
BACKGROUND: A history of penicillin allergy in patients is common, but only 10–15 % are truly allergic. While the gold standard for diagnosing penicillin allergy is challenge, it is not recommended that this be done without first carrying out diagnostic skin testing. This is carried out with the maj...
Autores principales: | , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2015
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4654886/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26594228 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13223-015-0098-5 |
_version_ | 1782402118791987200 |
---|---|
author | Rosenfield, Lana Kalicinsky, Chrystyna Warrington, Richard |
author_facet | Rosenfield, Lana Kalicinsky, Chrystyna Warrington, Richard |
author_sort | Rosenfield, Lana |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: A history of penicillin allergy in patients is common, but only 10–15 % are truly allergic. While the gold standard for diagnosing penicillin allergy is challenge, it is not recommended that this be done without first carrying out diagnostic skin testing. This is carried out with the major determinant benzylpenicilloyl (PPL) and the minor determinant mixture (MDM), consisting of penilloate, penicilloate and Penicillin G. However, since availability of the MDM is limited, Penicillin G alone has been used. METHODS: A retrospective chart review was carried out on patients tested for penicillin allergy in the Clinical Immunology and Allergy Clinic at the Health Sciences Centre, Winnipeg, Canada between 2005 and 2013. A total of 521 patients charts were reviewed, of whom 240 had skin testing, ImmunoCap(®) for IgE to Penicillin G and V and had oral challenges with penicillin, amoxicillin or cloxacillin. RESULTS: 17/240 (7.5 %) were skin test positive, 8 to PPL, 4 to MDM and 5 to Penicillin G. One was also positive on ImmunoCap(®) testing. Three patients had negative skin tests but weakly positive ImmunoCap(®). 222 patients with negative skin tests and serological tests were challenged. Of these, 12 patients reacted to challenge. Three of the challenges were equivocal. Of the nine patients with definite positive challenges, three were tested with Penicillin G and six with MDM. Therefore the false negative rates for testing were 2.3 % with PPL and Penicillin G and 6.97 % for PPL and MDM. The difference was not significant (p = 0.0856). CONCLUSIONS: In this group of patients with a history of penicillin allergy tested with the major determinant of benzyl penicillin and either MDM or Penicillin G, there was no difference in the rate of false negative testing, based on oral penicillin challenges. Therefore, Penicillin G can be safely used as an alternative to MDM in diagnosing penicillin allergy. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-4654886 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2015 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-46548862015-11-22 A retrospective comparison of false negative skin test rates in penicillin allergy, using pencilloyl-poly-lysine and minor determinants or Penicillin G, followed by open challenge Rosenfield, Lana Kalicinsky, Chrystyna Warrington, Richard Allergy Asthma Clin Immunol Research BACKGROUND: A history of penicillin allergy in patients is common, but only 10–15 % are truly allergic. While the gold standard for diagnosing penicillin allergy is challenge, it is not recommended that this be done without first carrying out diagnostic skin testing. This is carried out with the major determinant benzylpenicilloyl (PPL) and the minor determinant mixture (MDM), consisting of penilloate, penicilloate and Penicillin G. However, since availability of the MDM is limited, Penicillin G alone has been used. METHODS: A retrospective chart review was carried out on patients tested for penicillin allergy in the Clinical Immunology and Allergy Clinic at the Health Sciences Centre, Winnipeg, Canada between 2005 and 2013. A total of 521 patients charts were reviewed, of whom 240 had skin testing, ImmunoCap(®) for IgE to Penicillin G and V and had oral challenges with penicillin, amoxicillin or cloxacillin. RESULTS: 17/240 (7.5 %) were skin test positive, 8 to PPL, 4 to MDM and 5 to Penicillin G. One was also positive on ImmunoCap(®) testing. Three patients had negative skin tests but weakly positive ImmunoCap(®). 222 patients with negative skin tests and serological tests were challenged. Of these, 12 patients reacted to challenge. Three of the challenges were equivocal. Of the nine patients with definite positive challenges, three were tested with Penicillin G and six with MDM. Therefore the false negative rates for testing were 2.3 % with PPL and Penicillin G and 6.97 % for PPL and MDM. The difference was not significant (p = 0.0856). CONCLUSIONS: In this group of patients with a history of penicillin allergy tested with the major determinant of benzyl penicillin and either MDM or Penicillin G, there was no difference in the rate of false negative testing, based on oral penicillin challenges. Therefore, Penicillin G can be safely used as an alternative to MDM in diagnosing penicillin allergy. BioMed Central 2015-11-20 /pmc/articles/PMC4654886/ /pubmed/26594228 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13223-015-0098-5 Text en © Rosenfield et al. 2015 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated. |
spellingShingle | Research Rosenfield, Lana Kalicinsky, Chrystyna Warrington, Richard A retrospective comparison of false negative skin test rates in penicillin allergy, using pencilloyl-poly-lysine and minor determinants or Penicillin G, followed by open challenge |
title | A retrospective comparison of false negative skin test rates in penicillin allergy, using pencilloyl-poly-lysine and minor determinants or Penicillin G, followed by open challenge |
title_full | A retrospective comparison of false negative skin test rates in penicillin allergy, using pencilloyl-poly-lysine and minor determinants or Penicillin G, followed by open challenge |
title_fullStr | A retrospective comparison of false negative skin test rates in penicillin allergy, using pencilloyl-poly-lysine and minor determinants or Penicillin G, followed by open challenge |
title_full_unstemmed | A retrospective comparison of false negative skin test rates in penicillin allergy, using pencilloyl-poly-lysine and minor determinants or Penicillin G, followed by open challenge |
title_short | A retrospective comparison of false negative skin test rates in penicillin allergy, using pencilloyl-poly-lysine and minor determinants or Penicillin G, followed by open challenge |
title_sort | retrospective comparison of false negative skin test rates in penicillin allergy, using pencilloyl-poly-lysine and minor determinants or penicillin g, followed by open challenge |
topic | Research |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4654886/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26594228 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13223-015-0098-5 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT rosenfieldlana aretrospectivecomparisonoffalsenegativeskintestratesinpenicillinallergyusingpencilloylpolylysineandminordeterminantsorpenicillingfollowedbyopenchallenge AT kalicinskychrystyna aretrospectivecomparisonoffalsenegativeskintestratesinpenicillinallergyusingpencilloylpolylysineandminordeterminantsorpenicillingfollowedbyopenchallenge AT warringtonrichard aretrospectivecomparisonoffalsenegativeskintestratesinpenicillinallergyusingpencilloylpolylysineandminordeterminantsorpenicillingfollowedbyopenchallenge AT rosenfieldlana retrospectivecomparisonoffalsenegativeskintestratesinpenicillinallergyusingpencilloylpolylysineandminordeterminantsorpenicillingfollowedbyopenchallenge AT kalicinskychrystyna retrospectivecomparisonoffalsenegativeskintestratesinpenicillinallergyusingpencilloylpolylysineandminordeterminantsorpenicillingfollowedbyopenchallenge AT warringtonrichard retrospectivecomparisonoffalsenegativeskintestratesinpenicillinallergyusingpencilloylpolylysineandminordeterminantsorpenicillingfollowedbyopenchallenge |