Cargando…

Experimental infection of a US spike-insertion deletion porcine epidemic diarrhea virus in conventional nursing piglets and cross-protection to the original US PEDV infection

Although the original US porcine epidemic diarrhea virus (PEDV) was confirmed as highly virulent by multiple studies, the virulence of spike-insertion deletion (S-INDEL) PEDV strains is undefined. In this study, 3–4 day-old conventional suckling piglets were inoculated with S-INDEL PEDV Iowa106 (4 p...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Lin, Chun-Ming, Annamalai, Thavamathi, Liu, Xinsheng, Gao, Xiang, Lu, Zhongyan, El-Tholoth, Mohamed, Hu, Hui, Saif, Linda J., Wang, Qiuhong
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2015
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4654902/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26589292
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13567-015-0278-9
_version_ 1782402122473537536
author Lin, Chun-Ming
Annamalai, Thavamathi
Liu, Xinsheng
Gao, Xiang
Lu, Zhongyan
El-Tholoth, Mohamed
Hu, Hui
Saif, Linda J.
Wang, Qiuhong
author_facet Lin, Chun-Ming
Annamalai, Thavamathi
Liu, Xinsheng
Gao, Xiang
Lu, Zhongyan
El-Tholoth, Mohamed
Hu, Hui
Saif, Linda J.
Wang, Qiuhong
author_sort Lin, Chun-Ming
collection PubMed
description Although the original US porcine epidemic diarrhea virus (PEDV) was confirmed as highly virulent by multiple studies, the virulence of spike-insertion deletion (S-INDEL) PEDV strains is undefined. In this study, 3–4 day-old conventional suckling piglets were inoculated with S-INDEL PEDV Iowa106 (4 pig litters) to study its virulence. Two litters of age-matched piglets were inoculated with either the original US PEDV PC21A or mock as positive and negative controls, respectively. Subsequently, all pigs were challenged with the original US PEDV PC21A on 21–29 days post-inoculation (dpi) to assess cross-protection. All S-INDEL Iowa106- and the original US PC21A-inoculated piglets developed diarrhea. However, the severity of clinical signs, mortality (0–75%) and fecal PEDV RNA shedding titers varied among the four S-INDEL Iowa106-inoculated litters. Compared with the original PC21A, piglets euthanized/died acutely from S-INDEL Iowa106 infection had relatively milder villous atrophy, lower antigen scores and more limited intestinal infection. Two of four S-INDEL Iowa106-infected sows and the original PC21A-infected sow showed anorexia and watery diarrhea for 1–4 days. After the original PC21A challenge, a subset (13/16) of S-INDEL Iowa106-inoculated piglets developed diarrhea, whereas all (5/5) and no (0/4) pigs in the mock and original PC21A-inoculated pigs had diarrhea, respectively. Our results suggest that the virulence of S-INDEL PEDV Iowa106 was less than the original US PEDV PC21A in suckling pigs, with 100% morbidity and 18% (6/33) overall (0–75%) mortality in suckling pigs depending on factors such as the sow’s health and lactation and the piglets’ birth weight. Prior infection by S-INDEL Iowa106 provided partial cross-protection to piglets against the original PC21A challenge at 21–29 dpi.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4654902
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2015
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-46549022015-11-22 Experimental infection of a US spike-insertion deletion porcine epidemic diarrhea virus in conventional nursing piglets and cross-protection to the original US PEDV infection Lin, Chun-Ming Annamalai, Thavamathi Liu, Xinsheng Gao, Xiang Lu, Zhongyan El-Tholoth, Mohamed Hu, Hui Saif, Linda J. Wang, Qiuhong Vet Res Research Article Although the original US porcine epidemic diarrhea virus (PEDV) was confirmed as highly virulent by multiple studies, the virulence of spike-insertion deletion (S-INDEL) PEDV strains is undefined. In this study, 3–4 day-old conventional suckling piglets were inoculated with S-INDEL PEDV Iowa106 (4 pig litters) to study its virulence. Two litters of age-matched piglets were inoculated with either the original US PEDV PC21A or mock as positive and negative controls, respectively. Subsequently, all pigs were challenged with the original US PEDV PC21A on 21–29 days post-inoculation (dpi) to assess cross-protection. All S-INDEL Iowa106- and the original US PC21A-inoculated piglets developed diarrhea. However, the severity of clinical signs, mortality (0–75%) and fecal PEDV RNA shedding titers varied among the four S-INDEL Iowa106-inoculated litters. Compared with the original PC21A, piglets euthanized/died acutely from S-INDEL Iowa106 infection had relatively milder villous atrophy, lower antigen scores and more limited intestinal infection. Two of four S-INDEL Iowa106-infected sows and the original PC21A-infected sow showed anorexia and watery diarrhea for 1–4 days. After the original PC21A challenge, a subset (13/16) of S-INDEL Iowa106-inoculated piglets developed diarrhea, whereas all (5/5) and no (0/4) pigs in the mock and original PC21A-inoculated pigs had diarrhea, respectively. Our results suggest that the virulence of S-INDEL PEDV Iowa106 was less than the original US PEDV PC21A in suckling pigs, with 100% morbidity and 18% (6/33) overall (0–75%) mortality in suckling pigs depending on factors such as the sow’s health and lactation and the piglets’ birth weight. Prior infection by S-INDEL Iowa106 provided partial cross-protection to piglets against the original PC21A challenge at 21–29 dpi. BioMed Central 2015-11-20 2015 /pmc/articles/PMC4654902/ /pubmed/26589292 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13567-015-0278-9 Text en © Lin et al. 2015 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Research Article
Lin, Chun-Ming
Annamalai, Thavamathi
Liu, Xinsheng
Gao, Xiang
Lu, Zhongyan
El-Tholoth, Mohamed
Hu, Hui
Saif, Linda J.
Wang, Qiuhong
Experimental infection of a US spike-insertion deletion porcine epidemic diarrhea virus in conventional nursing piglets and cross-protection to the original US PEDV infection
title Experimental infection of a US spike-insertion deletion porcine epidemic diarrhea virus in conventional nursing piglets and cross-protection to the original US PEDV infection
title_full Experimental infection of a US spike-insertion deletion porcine epidemic diarrhea virus in conventional nursing piglets and cross-protection to the original US PEDV infection
title_fullStr Experimental infection of a US spike-insertion deletion porcine epidemic diarrhea virus in conventional nursing piglets and cross-protection to the original US PEDV infection
title_full_unstemmed Experimental infection of a US spike-insertion deletion porcine epidemic diarrhea virus in conventional nursing piglets and cross-protection to the original US PEDV infection
title_short Experimental infection of a US spike-insertion deletion porcine epidemic diarrhea virus in conventional nursing piglets and cross-protection to the original US PEDV infection
title_sort experimental infection of a us spike-insertion deletion porcine epidemic diarrhea virus in conventional nursing piglets and cross-protection to the original us pedv infection
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4654902/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26589292
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13567-015-0278-9
work_keys_str_mv AT linchunming experimentalinfectionofausspikeinsertiondeletionporcineepidemicdiarrheavirusinconventionalnursingpigletsandcrossprotectiontotheoriginaluspedvinfection
AT annamalaithavamathi experimentalinfectionofausspikeinsertiondeletionporcineepidemicdiarrheavirusinconventionalnursingpigletsandcrossprotectiontotheoriginaluspedvinfection
AT liuxinsheng experimentalinfectionofausspikeinsertiondeletionporcineepidemicdiarrheavirusinconventionalnursingpigletsandcrossprotectiontotheoriginaluspedvinfection
AT gaoxiang experimentalinfectionofausspikeinsertiondeletionporcineepidemicdiarrheavirusinconventionalnursingpigletsandcrossprotectiontotheoriginaluspedvinfection
AT luzhongyan experimentalinfectionofausspikeinsertiondeletionporcineepidemicdiarrheavirusinconventionalnursingpigletsandcrossprotectiontotheoriginaluspedvinfection
AT eltholothmohamed experimentalinfectionofausspikeinsertiondeletionporcineepidemicdiarrheavirusinconventionalnursingpigletsandcrossprotectiontotheoriginaluspedvinfection
AT huhui experimentalinfectionofausspikeinsertiondeletionporcineepidemicdiarrheavirusinconventionalnursingpigletsandcrossprotectiontotheoriginaluspedvinfection
AT saiflindaj experimentalinfectionofausspikeinsertiondeletionporcineepidemicdiarrheavirusinconventionalnursingpigletsandcrossprotectiontotheoriginaluspedvinfection
AT wangqiuhong experimentalinfectionofausspikeinsertiondeletionporcineepidemicdiarrheavirusinconventionalnursingpigletsandcrossprotectiontotheoriginaluspedvinfection