Cargando…
Optimization of carbon ion and proton treatment plans using the raster-scanning technique for patients with unresectable pancreatic cancer
BACKGROUND: The aim of the thesis is to improve radiation plans of patients with locally advanced, unresectable pancreatic cancer by using carbon ion and proton beams. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Using the treatment planning system Syngo RT Planning (Siemens, Erlangen, Germany) a total of 50 treatment pla...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2015
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4654923/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26590103 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13014-015-0538-x |
_version_ | 1782402127328444416 |
---|---|
author | Dreher, Constantin Habermehl, Daniel Ecker, Swantje Brons, Stephan El-Shafie, Rami Jäkel, Oliver Debus, Jürgen Combs, Stephanie E. |
author_facet | Dreher, Constantin Habermehl, Daniel Ecker, Swantje Brons, Stephan El-Shafie, Rami Jäkel, Oliver Debus, Jürgen Combs, Stephanie E. |
author_sort | Dreher, Constantin |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: The aim of the thesis is to improve radiation plans of patients with locally advanced, unresectable pancreatic cancer by using carbon ion and proton beams. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Using the treatment planning system Syngo RT Planning (Siemens, Erlangen, Germany) a total of 50 treatment plans have been created for five patients with the dose schedule 15 × 3 Gy(RBE). With reference to the anatomy, five field configurations were considered to be relevant. The plans were analyzed with respect to dose distribution and individual anatomy, and compared using a customized index. RESULTS: Within the index the three-field configurations yielded the best results, though with a high variety of score points (field setup 5, carbon ion: median 74 (range 48–101)). The maximum dose in the myelon is low (e.g. case 3, carbon ion: 21.5 Gy(RBE)). A single posterior field generally spares the organs at risk, but the maximum dose in the myelon is high (e.g. case 3, carbon ion: 32.9 Gy(RBE)). Two oblique posterior fields resulted in acceptable maximum doses in the myelon (e.g. case 3, carbon ion: 26.9 Gy(RBE)). The single-field configuration and the two oblique posterior fields had a small score dispersion (carbon ion: median 66 and 58 (range 62–72 and 40–69)). In cases with topographic proximity of the organs at risk to the target volume, the single-field configuration scored as well as the three-field configurations. CONCLUSION: In summary, the three-field configurations showed the best dose distributions. A single posterior field seems to be robust and beneficial in case of difficult topographical conditions and topographical proximity of organs at risk to the target volume. A setup with two oblique posterior fields is a reasonable compromise between three-field and single-field configurations. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-4654923 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2015 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-46549232015-11-22 Optimization of carbon ion and proton treatment plans using the raster-scanning technique for patients with unresectable pancreatic cancer Dreher, Constantin Habermehl, Daniel Ecker, Swantje Brons, Stephan El-Shafie, Rami Jäkel, Oliver Debus, Jürgen Combs, Stephanie E. Radiat Oncol Research BACKGROUND: The aim of the thesis is to improve radiation plans of patients with locally advanced, unresectable pancreatic cancer by using carbon ion and proton beams. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Using the treatment planning system Syngo RT Planning (Siemens, Erlangen, Germany) a total of 50 treatment plans have been created for five patients with the dose schedule 15 × 3 Gy(RBE). With reference to the anatomy, five field configurations were considered to be relevant. The plans were analyzed with respect to dose distribution and individual anatomy, and compared using a customized index. RESULTS: Within the index the three-field configurations yielded the best results, though with a high variety of score points (field setup 5, carbon ion: median 74 (range 48–101)). The maximum dose in the myelon is low (e.g. case 3, carbon ion: 21.5 Gy(RBE)). A single posterior field generally spares the organs at risk, but the maximum dose in the myelon is high (e.g. case 3, carbon ion: 32.9 Gy(RBE)). Two oblique posterior fields resulted in acceptable maximum doses in the myelon (e.g. case 3, carbon ion: 26.9 Gy(RBE)). The single-field configuration and the two oblique posterior fields had a small score dispersion (carbon ion: median 66 and 58 (range 62–72 and 40–69)). In cases with topographic proximity of the organs at risk to the target volume, the single-field configuration scored as well as the three-field configurations. CONCLUSION: In summary, the three-field configurations showed the best dose distributions. A single posterior field seems to be robust and beneficial in case of difficult topographical conditions and topographical proximity of organs at risk to the target volume. A setup with two oblique posterior fields is a reasonable compromise between three-field and single-field configurations. BioMed Central 2015-11-21 /pmc/articles/PMC4654923/ /pubmed/26590103 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13014-015-0538-x Text en © Dreher et al. 2015 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated. |
spellingShingle | Research Dreher, Constantin Habermehl, Daniel Ecker, Swantje Brons, Stephan El-Shafie, Rami Jäkel, Oliver Debus, Jürgen Combs, Stephanie E. Optimization of carbon ion and proton treatment plans using the raster-scanning technique for patients with unresectable pancreatic cancer |
title | Optimization of carbon ion and proton treatment plans using the raster-scanning technique for patients with unresectable pancreatic cancer |
title_full | Optimization of carbon ion and proton treatment plans using the raster-scanning technique for patients with unresectable pancreatic cancer |
title_fullStr | Optimization of carbon ion and proton treatment plans using the raster-scanning technique for patients with unresectable pancreatic cancer |
title_full_unstemmed | Optimization of carbon ion and proton treatment plans using the raster-scanning technique for patients with unresectable pancreatic cancer |
title_short | Optimization of carbon ion and proton treatment plans using the raster-scanning technique for patients with unresectable pancreatic cancer |
title_sort | optimization of carbon ion and proton treatment plans using the raster-scanning technique for patients with unresectable pancreatic cancer |
topic | Research |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4654923/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26590103 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13014-015-0538-x |
work_keys_str_mv | AT dreherconstantin optimizationofcarbonionandprotontreatmentplansusingtherasterscanningtechniqueforpatientswithunresectablepancreaticcancer AT habermehldaniel optimizationofcarbonionandprotontreatmentplansusingtherasterscanningtechniqueforpatientswithunresectablepancreaticcancer AT eckerswantje optimizationofcarbonionandprotontreatmentplansusingtherasterscanningtechniqueforpatientswithunresectablepancreaticcancer AT bronsstephan optimizationofcarbonionandprotontreatmentplansusingtherasterscanningtechniqueforpatientswithunresectablepancreaticcancer AT elshafierami optimizationofcarbonionandprotontreatmentplansusingtherasterscanningtechniqueforpatientswithunresectablepancreaticcancer AT jakeloliver optimizationofcarbonionandprotontreatmentplansusingtherasterscanningtechniqueforpatientswithunresectablepancreaticcancer AT debusjurgen optimizationofcarbonionandprotontreatmentplansusingtherasterscanningtechniqueforpatientswithunresectablepancreaticcancer AT combsstephaniee optimizationofcarbonionandprotontreatmentplansusingtherasterscanningtechniqueforpatientswithunresectablepancreaticcancer |