Cargando…
National observational study to evaluate the “cleanyourhands” campaign (NOSEC): a questionnaire based study of national implementation
INTRODUCTION: The number of national hand-hygiene campaigns has increased recently, following the World Health Organisation’s (WHO) “Save Lives: clean your hands” initiative (2009), which offers hospitals a multi-component hand-hygiene intervention. The number of campaigns to be evaluated remains sm...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2015
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4655453/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26600938 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13756-015-0077-0 |
_version_ | 1782402197370175488 |
---|---|
author | Fuller, Christopher Savage, Joanne Cookson, Barry Hayward, Andrew Cooper, Ben Duckworth, Georgia Michie, Susan Jeanes, Annette Teare, Louise Charlett, Andre Stone, Sheldon Paul |
author_facet | Fuller, Christopher Savage, Joanne Cookson, Barry Hayward, Andrew Cooper, Ben Duckworth, Georgia Michie, Susan Jeanes, Annette Teare, Louise Charlett, Andre Stone, Sheldon Paul |
author_sort | Fuller, Christopher |
collection | PubMed |
description | INTRODUCTION: The number of national hand-hygiene campaigns has increased recently, following the World Health Organisation’s (WHO) “Save Lives: clean your hands” initiative (2009), which offers hospitals a multi-component hand-hygiene intervention. The number of campaigns to be evaluated remains small. Most evaluations focus on consumption of alcohol hand rub (AHR). We are not aware of any evaluation reporting implementation of all campaign components. In a previously published report, we evaluated the effects of the English and Welsh cleanyourhands campaign (2004–8) on procurement of AHR and soap, and on selected healthcare associated infections. We now report on the implementation of each individual campaign component: provision of bedside AHR, ward posters, patient empowerment materials, audit and feedback, and guidance to secure institutional engagement. METHOD: Setting: all 189 acute National Health Service (NHS) hospitals in England and Wales (December 2005–June 2008). Six postal questionnaires (five voluntary, one mandatory) were distributed to infection control teams six-monthly from 6 to 36 months post roll-out. Selection and attrition bias were measured. RESULTS: Response rates fell from 134 (71 %) at 6 months to 82 (44 %) at 30 months, rising to 167 (90 %) for the final mandatory one (36 months). There was no evidence of attrition or selection bias. Hospitals reported widespread early implementation of bedside AHR and posters and a gradual rise in audit. At 36 months, 90 % of respondents reported the campaign to be a top hospital priority, with implementation of AHR, posters and audit reported by 96 %, 97 % and 91 % respectively. Patient empowerment was less successful. CONCLUSIONS: The study suggests that all campaign components, apart from patient empowerment, were widely implemented and sustained. It supports previous work suggesting that adequate piloting, strong governmental support, refreshment of campaigns, and sufficient time to engage institutions help secure sustained implementation of a campaign’s key components. The results should encourage countries wishing to launch coordinated national campaigns for hospitals to participate in the WHO’s “Save Lives” initiative, which offers hospitals a similar multi-component intervention. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-4655453 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2015 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-46554532015-11-24 National observational study to evaluate the “cleanyourhands” campaign (NOSEC): a questionnaire based study of national implementation Fuller, Christopher Savage, Joanne Cookson, Barry Hayward, Andrew Cooper, Ben Duckworth, Georgia Michie, Susan Jeanes, Annette Teare, Louise Charlett, Andre Stone, Sheldon Paul Antimicrob Resist Infect Control Research INTRODUCTION: The number of national hand-hygiene campaigns has increased recently, following the World Health Organisation’s (WHO) “Save Lives: clean your hands” initiative (2009), which offers hospitals a multi-component hand-hygiene intervention. The number of campaigns to be evaluated remains small. Most evaluations focus on consumption of alcohol hand rub (AHR). We are not aware of any evaluation reporting implementation of all campaign components. In a previously published report, we evaluated the effects of the English and Welsh cleanyourhands campaign (2004–8) on procurement of AHR and soap, and on selected healthcare associated infections. We now report on the implementation of each individual campaign component: provision of bedside AHR, ward posters, patient empowerment materials, audit and feedback, and guidance to secure institutional engagement. METHOD: Setting: all 189 acute National Health Service (NHS) hospitals in England and Wales (December 2005–June 2008). Six postal questionnaires (five voluntary, one mandatory) were distributed to infection control teams six-monthly from 6 to 36 months post roll-out. Selection and attrition bias were measured. RESULTS: Response rates fell from 134 (71 %) at 6 months to 82 (44 %) at 30 months, rising to 167 (90 %) for the final mandatory one (36 months). There was no evidence of attrition or selection bias. Hospitals reported widespread early implementation of bedside AHR and posters and a gradual rise in audit. At 36 months, 90 % of respondents reported the campaign to be a top hospital priority, with implementation of AHR, posters and audit reported by 96 %, 97 % and 91 % respectively. Patient empowerment was less successful. CONCLUSIONS: The study suggests that all campaign components, apart from patient empowerment, were widely implemented and sustained. It supports previous work suggesting that adequate piloting, strong governmental support, refreshment of campaigns, and sufficient time to engage institutions help secure sustained implementation of a campaign’s key components. The results should encourage countries wishing to launch coordinated national campaigns for hospitals to participate in the WHO’s “Save Lives” initiative, which offers hospitals a similar multi-component intervention. BioMed Central 2015-11-23 /pmc/articles/PMC4655453/ /pubmed/26600938 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13756-015-0077-0 Text en © Fuller et al. 2015 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated. |
spellingShingle | Research Fuller, Christopher Savage, Joanne Cookson, Barry Hayward, Andrew Cooper, Ben Duckworth, Georgia Michie, Susan Jeanes, Annette Teare, Louise Charlett, Andre Stone, Sheldon Paul National observational study to evaluate the “cleanyourhands” campaign (NOSEC): a questionnaire based study of national implementation |
title | National observational study to evaluate the “cleanyourhands” campaign (NOSEC): a questionnaire based study of national implementation |
title_full | National observational study to evaluate the “cleanyourhands” campaign (NOSEC): a questionnaire based study of national implementation |
title_fullStr | National observational study to evaluate the “cleanyourhands” campaign (NOSEC): a questionnaire based study of national implementation |
title_full_unstemmed | National observational study to evaluate the “cleanyourhands” campaign (NOSEC): a questionnaire based study of national implementation |
title_short | National observational study to evaluate the “cleanyourhands” campaign (NOSEC): a questionnaire based study of national implementation |
title_sort | national observational study to evaluate the “cleanyourhands” campaign (nosec): a questionnaire based study of national implementation |
topic | Research |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4655453/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26600938 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13756-015-0077-0 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT fullerchristopher nationalobservationalstudytoevaluatethecleanyourhandscampaignnosecaquestionnairebasedstudyofnationalimplementation AT savagejoanne nationalobservationalstudytoevaluatethecleanyourhandscampaignnosecaquestionnairebasedstudyofnationalimplementation AT cooksonbarry nationalobservationalstudytoevaluatethecleanyourhandscampaignnosecaquestionnairebasedstudyofnationalimplementation AT haywardandrew nationalobservationalstudytoevaluatethecleanyourhandscampaignnosecaquestionnairebasedstudyofnationalimplementation AT cooperben nationalobservationalstudytoevaluatethecleanyourhandscampaignnosecaquestionnairebasedstudyofnationalimplementation AT duckworthgeorgia nationalobservationalstudytoevaluatethecleanyourhandscampaignnosecaquestionnairebasedstudyofnationalimplementation AT michiesusan nationalobservationalstudytoevaluatethecleanyourhandscampaignnosecaquestionnairebasedstudyofnationalimplementation AT jeanesannette nationalobservationalstudytoevaluatethecleanyourhandscampaignnosecaquestionnairebasedstudyofnationalimplementation AT tearelouise nationalobservationalstudytoevaluatethecleanyourhandscampaignnosecaquestionnairebasedstudyofnationalimplementation AT charlettandre nationalobservationalstudytoevaluatethecleanyourhandscampaignnosecaquestionnairebasedstudyofnationalimplementation AT stonesheldonpaul nationalobservationalstudytoevaluatethecleanyourhandscampaignnosecaquestionnairebasedstudyofnationalimplementation |