Cargando…

Transfusion strategy in hematological intensive care unit: study protocol for a randomized controlled trial

BACKGROUND: Packed red blood cell (PRBC) transfusion is required in hematology patients treated with chemotherapy for acute leukemia, autologous (auto) or allogeneic (allo) hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT). In certain situations like septic shock, hip surgery, coronary disease or gastr...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Chantepie, Sylvain P., Mear, Jean-Baptiste, Guittet, Lydia, Dervaux, Benoît, Marolleau, Jean-Pierre, Jardin, Fabrice, Dutheil, Jean-Jacques, Parienti, Jean-Jacques, Vilque, Jean-Pierre, Reman, Oumedaly
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2015
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4655487/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26592377
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13063-015-1057-7
_version_ 1782402204398780416
author Chantepie, Sylvain P.
Mear, Jean-Baptiste
Guittet, Lydia
Dervaux, Benoît
Marolleau, Jean-Pierre
Jardin, Fabrice
Dutheil, Jean-Jacques
Parienti, Jean-Jacques
Vilque, Jean-Pierre
Reman, Oumedaly
author_facet Chantepie, Sylvain P.
Mear, Jean-Baptiste
Guittet, Lydia
Dervaux, Benoît
Marolleau, Jean-Pierre
Jardin, Fabrice
Dutheil, Jean-Jacques
Parienti, Jean-Jacques
Vilque, Jean-Pierre
Reman, Oumedaly
author_sort Chantepie, Sylvain P.
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Packed red blood cell (PRBC) transfusion is required in hematology patients treated with chemotherapy for acute leukemia, autologous (auto) or allogeneic (allo) hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT). In certain situations like septic shock, hip surgery, coronary disease or gastrointestinal hemorrhage, a restrictive transfusion strategy is associated with a reduction of infection and death. A transfusion strategy using a single PRBC unit has been retrospectively investigated and showed a safe reduction of PRBC consumption and costs. We therefore designed a study to prospectively demonstrate that the transfusion of a single PRBC unit is safe and not inferior to standard care. METHODS: The 1versus2 trial is a randomized trial which will determine if a single-unit transfusion policy is not inferior to a double-unit transfusion policy. The primary endpoint is the incidence of severe complication (grade ≥ 3) defined as stroke, transient ischemic attack, acute coronary syndrome, heart failure, elevated troponin level, intensive care unit transfer, death, new pulmonary infiltrates, and transfusion-related infections during hospital stays. The secondary endpoint is the number of PRBC units transfused per patient per hospital stay. Two hundred and thirty patients will be randomized to receive a single unit or double unit every time the hemoglobin level is less than 8 g/dL. All patients admitted for induction remission chemotherapy, auto-HSCT or allo-HSCT in hematology intensive care units will be eligible for inclusion. Sample size calculation has determined that a patient population of 230 will be required to prove that the 1-unit PRBC strategy is non-inferior to the 2-unit PRBC strategy. Hemoglobin threshold for transfusion is below 8 g/dL. Estimated percentage of complication-free hospital stays is 93 %. In a non-inferiority hypothesis, the number of patients to include is 230 with a power of 90 % and an alpha risk of 5 %. TRIAL REGISTRATION: 14–128; Clinicaltrials.gov NCT02461264 (registered on 3 June 2015)
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4655487
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2015
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-46554872015-11-24 Transfusion strategy in hematological intensive care unit: study protocol for a randomized controlled trial Chantepie, Sylvain P. Mear, Jean-Baptiste Guittet, Lydia Dervaux, Benoît Marolleau, Jean-Pierre Jardin, Fabrice Dutheil, Jean-Jacques Parienti, Jean-Jacques Vilque, Jean-Pierre Reman, Oumedaly Trials Study Protocol BACKGROUND: Packed red blood cell (PRBC) transfusion is required in hematology patients treated with chemotherapy for acute leukemia, autologous (auto) or allogeneic (allo) hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT). In certain situations like septic shock, hip surgery, coronary disease or gastrointestinal hemorrhage, a restrictive transfusion strategy is associated with a reduction of infection and death. A transfusion strategy using a single PRBC unit has been retrospectively investigated and showed a safe reduction of PRBC consumption and costs. We therefore designed a study to prospectively demonstrate that the transfusion of a single PRBC unit is safe and not inferior to standard care. METHODS: The 1versus2 trial is a randomized trial which will determine if a single-unit transfusion policy is not inferior to a double-unit transfusion policy. The primary endpoint is the incidence of severe complication (grade ≥ 3) defined as stroke, transient ischemic attack, acute coronary syndrome, heart failure, elevated troponin level, intensive care unit transfer, death, new pulmonary infiltrates, and transfusion-related infections during hospital stays. The secondary endpoint is the number of PRBC units transfused per patient per hospital stay. Two hundred and thirty patients will be randomized to receive a single unit or double unit every time the hemoglobin level is less than 8 g/dL. All patients admitted for induction remission chemotherapy, auto-HSCT or allo-HSCT in hematology intensive care units will be eligible for inclusion. Sample size calculation has determined that a patient population of 230 will be required to prove that the 1-unit PRBC strategy is non-inferior to the 2-unit PRBC strategy. Hemoglobin threshold for transfusion is below 8 g/dL. Estimated percentage of complication-free hospital stays is 93 %. In a non-inferiority hypothesis, the number of patients to include is 230 with a power of 90 % and an alpha risk of 5 %. TRIAL REGISTRATION: 14–128; Clinicaltrials.gov NCT02461264 (registered on 3 June 2015) BioMed Central 2015-11-23 /pmc/articles/PMC4655487/ /pubmed/26592377 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13063-015-1057-7 Text en © Chantepie et al. 2015 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Study Protocol
Chantepie, Sylvain P.
Mear, Jean-Baptiste
Guittet, Lydia
Dervaux, Benoît
Marolleau, Jean-Pierre
Jardin, Fabrice
Dutheil, Jean-Jacques
Parienti, Jean-Jacques
Vilque, Jean-Pierre
Reman, Oumedaly
Transfusion strategy in hematological intensive care unit: study protocol for a randomized controlled trial
title Transfusion strategy in hematological intensive care unit: study protocol for a randomized controlled trial
title_full Transfusion strategy in hematological intensive care unit: study protocol for a randomized controlled trial
title_fullStr Transfusion strategy in hematological intensive care unit: study protocol for a randomized controlled trial
title_full_unstemmed Transfusion strategy in hematological intensive care unit: study protocol for a randomized controlled trial
title_short Transfusion strategy in hematological intensive care unit: study protocol for a randomized controlled trial
title_sort transfusion strategy in hematological intensive care unit: study protocol for a randomized controlled trial
topic Study Protocol
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4655487/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26592377
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13063-015-1057-7
work_keys_str_mv AT chantepiesylvainp transfusionstrategyinhematologicalintensivecareunitstudyprotocolforarandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT mearjeanbaptiste transfusionstrategyinhematologicalintensivecareunitstudyprotocolforarandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT guittetlydia transfusionstrategyinhematologicalintensivecareunitstudyprotocolforarandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT dervauxbenoit transfusionstrategyinhematologicalintensivecareunitstudyprotocolforarandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT marolleaujeanpierre transfusionstrategyinhematologicalintensivecareunitstudyprotocolforarandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT jardinfabrice transfusionstrategyinhematologicalintensivecareunitstudyprotocolforarandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT dutheiljeanjacques transfusionstrategyinhematologicalintensivecareunitstudyprotocolforarandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT parientijeanjacques transfusionstrategyinhematologicalintensivecareunitstudyprotocolforarandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT vilquejeanpierre transfusionstrategyinhematologicalintensivecareunitstudyprotocolforarandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT remanoumedaly transfusionstrategyinhematologicalintensivecareunitstudyprotocolforarandomizedcontrolledtrial