Cargando…
Transfusion strategy in hematological intensive care unit: study protocol for a randomized controlled trial
BACKGROUND: Packed red blood cell (PRBC) transfusion is required in hematology patients treated with chemotherapy for acute leukemia, autologous (auto) or allogeneic (allo) hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT). In certain situations like septic shock, hip surgery, coronary disease or gastr...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2015
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4655487/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26592377 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13063-015-1057-7 |
_version_ | 1782402204398780416 |
---|---|
author | Chantepie, Sylvain P. Mear, Jean-Baptiste Guittet, Lydia Dervaux, Benoît Marolleau, Jean-Pierre Jardin, Fabrice Dutheil, Jean-Jacques Parienti, Jean-Jacques Vilque, Jean-Pierre Reman, Oumedaly |
author_facet | Chantepie, Sylvain P. Mear, Jean-Baptiste Guittet, Lydia Dervaux, Benoît Marolleau, Jean-Pierre Jardin, Fabrice Dutheil, Jean-Jacques Parienti, Jean-Jacques Vilque, Jean-Pierre Reman, Oumedaly |
author_sort | Chantepie, Sylvain P. |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Packed red blood cell (PRBC) transfusion is required in hematology patients treated with chemotherapy for acute leukemia, autologous (auto) or allogeneic (allo) hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT). In certain situations like septic shock, hip surgery, coronary disease or gastrointestinal hemorrhage, a restrictive transfusion strategy is associated with a reduction of infection and death. A transfusion strategy using a single PRBC unit has been retrospectively investigated and showed a safe reduction of PRBC consumption and costs. We therefore designed a study to prospectively demonstrate that the transfusion of a single PRBC unit is safe and not inferior to standard care. METHODS: The 1versus2 trial is a randomized trial which will determine if a single-unit transfusion policy is not inferior to a double-unit transfusion policy. The primary endpoint is the incidence of severe complication (grade ≥ 3) defined as stroke, transient ischemic attack, acute coronary syndrome, heart failure, elevated troponin level, intensive care unit transfer, death, new pulmonary infiltrates, and transfusion-related infections during hospital stays. The secondary endpoint is the number of PRBC units transfused per patient per hospital stay. Two hundred and thirty patients will be randomized to receive a single unit or double unit every time the hemoglobin level is less than 8 g/dL. All patients admitted for induction remission chemotherapy, auto-HSCT or allo-HSCT in hematology intensive care units will be eligible for inclusion. Sample size calculation has determined that a patient population of 230 will be required to prove that the 1-unit PRBC strategy is non-inferior to the 2-unit PRBC strategy. Hemoglobin threshold for transfusion is below 8 g/dL. Estimated percentage of complication-free hospital stays is 93 %. In a non-inferiority hypothesis, the number of patients to include is 230 with a power of 90 % and an alpha risk of 5 %. TRIAL REGISTRATION: 14–128; Clinicaltrials.gov NCT02461264 (registered on 3 June 2015) |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-4655487 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2015 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-46554872015-11-24 Transfusion strategy in hematological intensive care unit: study protocol for a randomized controlled trial Chantepie, Sylvain P. Mear, Jean-Baptiste Guittet, Lydia Dervaux, Benoît Marolleau, Jean-Pierre Jardin, Fabrice Dutheil, Jean-Jacques Parienti, Jean-Jacques Vilque, Jean-Pierre Reman, Oumedaly Trials Study Protocol BACKGROUND: Packed red blood cell (PRBC) transfusion is required in hematology patients treated with chemotherapy for acute leukemia, autologous (auto) or allogeneic (allo) hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT). In certain situations like septic shock, hip surgery, coronary disease or gastrointestinal hemorrhage, a restrictive transfusion strategy is associated with a reduction of infection and death. A transfusion strategy using a single PRBC unit has been retrospectively investigated and showed a safe reduction of PRBC consumption and costs. We therefore designed a study to prospectively demonstrate that the transfusion of a single PRBC unit is safe and not inferior to standard care. METHODS: The 1versus2 trial is a randomized trial which will determine if a single-unit transfusion policy is not inferior to a double-unit transfusion policy. The primary endpoint is the incidence of severe complication (grade ≥ 3) defined as stroke, transient ischemic attack, acute coronary syndrome, heart failure, elevated troponin level, intensive care unit transfer, death, new pulmonary infiltrates, and transfusion-related infections during hospital stays. The secondary endpoint is the number of PRBC units transfused per patient per hospital stay. Two hundred and thirty patients will be randomized to receive a single unit or double unit every time the hemoglobin level is less than 8 g/dL. All patients admitted for induction remission chemotherapy, auto-HSCT or allo-HSCT in hematology intensive care units will be eligible for inclusion. Sample size calculation has determined that a patient population of 230 will be required to prove that the 1-unit PRBC strategy is non-inferior to the 2-unit PRBC strategy. Hemoglobin threshold for transfusion is below 8 g/dL. Estimated percentage of complication-free hospital stays is 93 %. In a non-inferiority hypothesis, the number of patients to include is 230 with a power of 90 % and an alpha risk of 5 %. TRIAL REGISTRATION: 14–128; Clinicaltrials.gov NCT02461264 (registered on 3 June 2015) BioMed Central 2015-11-23 /pmc/articles/PMC4655487/ /pubmed/26592377 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13063-015-1057-7 Text en © Chantepie et al. 2015 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated. |
spellingShingle | Study Protocol Chantepie, Sylvain P. Mear, Jean-Baptiste Guittet, Lydia Dervaux, Benoît Marolleau, Jean-Pierre Jardin, Fabrice Dutheil, Jean-Jacques Parienti, Jean-Jacques Vilque, Jean-Pierre Reman, Oumedaly Transfusion strategy in hematological intensive care unit: study protocol for a randomized controlled trial |
title | Transfusion strategy in hematological intensive care unit: study protocol for a randomized controlled trial |
title_full | Transfusion strategy in hematological intensive care unit: study protocol for a randomized controlled trial |
title_fullStr | Transfusion strategy in hematological intensive care unit: study protocol for a randomized controlled trial |
title_full_unstemmed | Transfusion strategy in hematological intensive care unit: study protocol for a randomized controlled trial |
title_short | Transfusion strategy in hematological intensive care unit: study protocol for a randomized controlled trial |
title_sort | transfusion strategy in hematological intensive care unit: study protocol for a randomized controlled trial |
topic | Study Protocol |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4655487/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26592377 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13063-015-1057-7 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT chantepiesylvainp transfusionstrategyinhematologicalintensivecareunitstudyprotocolforarandomizedcontrolledtrial AT mearjeanbaptiste transfusionstrategyinhematologicalintensivecareunitstudyprotocolforarandomizedcontrolledtrial AT guittetlydia transfusionstrategyinhematologicalintensivecareunitstudyprotocolforarandomizedcontrolledtrial AT dervauxbenoit transfusionstrategyinhematologicalintensivecareunitstudyprotocolforarandomizedcontrolledtrial AT marolleaujeanpierre transfusionstrategyinhematologicalintensivecareunitstudyprotocolforarandomizedcontrolledtrial AT jardinfabrice transfusionstrategyinhematologicalintensivecareunitstudyprotocolforarandomizedcontrolledtrial AT dutheiljeanjacques transfusionstrategyinhematologicalintensivecareunitstudyprotocolforarandomizedcontrolledtrial AT parientijeanjacques transfusionstrategyinhematologicalintensivecareunitstudyprotocolforarandomizedcontrolledtrial AT vilquejeanpierre transfusionstrategyinhematologicalintensivecareunitstudyprotocolforarandomizedcontrolledtrial AT remanoumedaly transfusionstrategyinhematologicalintensivecareunitstudyprotocolforarandomizedcontrolledtrial |