Cargando…

A retrospective analysis of factors influencing the success of autotransplanted posterior teeth

BACKGROUND: Survival and success rates of tooth transplantations even after long follow-up periods have been shown to be very high. Nevertheless, it is important to analyse factors potentially influencing these rates. The aim of this study was to assess the influence on success of potential factors....

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Ronchetti, Mirco F., Valdec, Silvio, Pandis, Nikolaos, Locher, Michael, van Waes, Hubertus
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2015
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4656252/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26597642
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40510-015-0112-y
_version_ 1782402266361233408
author Ronchetti, Mirco F.
Valdec, Silvio
Pandis, Nikolaos
Locher, Michael
van Waes, Hubertus
author_facet Ronchetti, Mirco F.
Valdec, Silvio
Pandis, Nikolaos
Locher, Michael
van Waes, Hubertus
author_sort Ronchetti, Mirco F.
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Survival and success rates of tooth transplantations even after long follow-up periods have been shown to be very high. Nevertheless, it is important to analyse factors potentially influencing these rates. The aim of this study was to assess the influence on success of potential factors. METHODS: The research was based on a retrospective analysis of clinical and radiological data from a sample of 59 subjects (75 transplanted teeth). The follow-up period varied from 0.44 to 12.28 years (mean 3.95 years). Success rates were calculated and depicted with Kaplan-Meier plots. Log-rank tests were used to analyse the effect of root development stage, apex width, the use of enamel matrix proteins or the surgeon on success of transplantations. RESULTS: Results for success of premolar transplantations were comparable with already published data, while molars performed worse than shown in other studies. The surgeon performing the transplantation (p = 0.001) and tooth type (p ≤ 0.001) were significantly associated with transplantation success. Use of enamel matrix proteins (p = 0.10), root development stage (p = 0.13), the recipient area (p = 0.48) and apex width (p = 0.59) were not significantly associated with success. CONCLUSIONS: Molar transplantations were not as successful as premolar transplantations; however, success rates varied greatly depending on the surgeon’s experience. The use of enamel matrix proteins as well as root development stage, the recipient area and apex width did not show significant associations with success of tooth transplantations.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4656252
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2015
publisher Springer Berlin Heidelberg
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-46562522015-12-03 A retrospective analysis of factors influencing the success of autotransplanted posterior teeth Ronchetti, Mirco F. Valdec, Silvio Pandis, Nikolaos Locher, Michael van Waes, Hubertus Prog Orthod Research BACKGROUND: Survival and success rates of tooth transplantations even after long follow-up periods have been shown to be very high. Nevertheless, it is important to analyse factors potentially influencing these rates. The aim of this study was to assess the influence on success of potential factors. METHODS: The research was based on a retrospective analysis of clinical and radiological data from a sample of 59 subjects (75 transplanted teeth). The follow-up period varied from 0.44 to 12.28 years (mean 3.95 years). Success rates were calculated and depicted with Kaplan-Meier plots. Log-rank tests were used to analyse the effect of root development stage, apex width, the use of enamel matrix proteins or the surgeon on success of transplantations. RESULTS: Results for success of premolar transplantations were comparable with already published data, while molars performed worse than shown in other studies. The surgeon performing the transplantation (p = 0.001) and tooth type (p ≤ 0.001) were significantly associated with transplantation success. Use of enamel matrix proteins (p = 0.10), root development stage (p = 0.13), the recipient area (p = 0.48) and apex width (p = 0.59) were not significantly associated with success. CONCLUSIONS: Molar transplantations were not as successful as premolar transplantations; however, success rates varied greatly depending on the surgeon’s experience. The use of enamel matrix proteins as well as root development stage, the recipient area and apex width did not show significant associations with success of tooth transplantations. Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2015-11-23 /pmc/articles/PMC4656252/ /pubmed/26597642 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40510-015-0112-y Text en © Ronchetti et al. 2015 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made.
spellingShingle Research
Ronchetti, Mirco F.
Valdec, Silvio
Pandis, Nikolaos
Locher, Michael
van Waes, Hubertus
A retrospective analysis of factors influencing the success of autotransplanted posterior teeth
title A retrospective analysis of factors influencing the success of autotransplanted posterior teeth
title_full A retrospective analysis of factors influencing the success of autotransplanted posterior teeth
title_fullStr A retrospective analysis of factors influencing the success of autotransplanted posterior teeth
title_full_unstemmed A retrospective analysis of factors influencing the success of autotransplanted posterior teeth
title_short A retrospective analysis of factors influencing the success of autotransplanted posterior teeth
title_sort retrospective analysis of factors influencing the success of autotransplanted posterior teeth
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4656252/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26597642
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40510-015-0112-y
work_keys_str_mv AT ronchettimircof aretrospectiveanalysisoffactorsinfluencingthesuccessofautotransplantedposteriorteeth
AT valdecsilvio aretrospectiveanalysisoffactorsinfluencingthesuccessofautotransplantedposteriorteeth
AT pandisnikolaos aretrospectiveanalysisoffactorsinfluencingthesuccessofautotransplantedposteriorteeth
AT lochermichael aretrospectiveanalysisoffactorsinfluencingthesuccessofautotransplantedposteriorteeth
AT vanwaeshubertus aretrospectiveanalysisoffactorsinfluencingthesuccessofautotransplantedposteriorteeth
AT ronchettimircof retrospectiveanalysisoffactorsinfluencingthesuccessofautotransplantedposteriorteeth
AT valdecsilvio retrospectiveanalysisoffactorsinfluencingthesuccessofautotransplantedposteriorteeth
AT pandisnikolaos retrospectiveanalysisoffactorsinfluencingthesuccessofautotransplantedposteriorteeth
AT lochermichael retrospectiveanalysisoffactorsinfluencingthesuccessofautotransplantedposteriorteeth
AT vanwaeshubertus retrospectiveanalysisoffactorsinfluencingthesuccessofautotransplantedposteriorteeth