Cargando…
A retrospective analysis of factors influencing the success of autotransplanted posterior teeth
BACKGROUND: Survival and success rates of tooth transplantations even after long follow-up periods have been shown to be very high. Nevertheless, it is important to analyse factors potentially influencing these rates. The aim of this study was to assess the influence on success of potential factors....
Autores principales: | , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Springer Berlin Heidelberg
2015
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4656252/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26597642 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40510-015-0112-y |
_version_ | 1782402266361233408 |
---|---|
author | Ronchetti, Mirco F. Valdec, Silvio Pandis, Nikolaos Locher, Michael van Waes, Hubertus |
author_facet | Ronchetti, Mirco F. Valdec, Silvio Pandis, Nikolaos Locher, Michael van Waes, Hubertus |
author_sort | Ronchetti, Mirco F. |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Survival and success rates of tooth transplantations even after long follow-up periods have been shown to be very high. Nevertheless, it is important to analyse factors potentially influencing these rates. The aim of this study was to assess the influence on success of potential factors. METHODS: The research was based on a retrospective analysis of clinical and radiological data from a sample of 59 subjects (75 transplanted teeth). The follow-up period varied from 0.44 to 12.28 years (mean 3.95 years). Success rates were calculated and depicted with Kaplan-Meier plots. Log-rank tests were used to analyse the effect of root development stage, apex width, the use of enamel matrix proteins or the surgeon on success of transplantations. RESULTS: Results for success of premolar transplantations were comparable with already published data, while molars performed worse than shown in other studies. The surgeon performing the transplantation (p = 0.001) and tooth type (p ≤ 0.001) were significantly associated with transplantation success. Use of enamel matrix proteins (p = 0.10), root development stage (p = 0.13), the recipient area (p = 0.48) and apex width (p = 0.59) were not significantly associated with success. CONCLUSIONS: Molar transplantations were not as successful as premolar transplantations; however, success rates varied greatly depending on the surgeon’s experience. The use of enamel matrix proteins as well as root development stage, the recipient area and apex width did not show significant associations with success of tooth transplantations. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-4656252 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2015 |
publisher | Springer Berlin Heidelberg |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-46562522015-12-03 A retrospective analysis of factors influencing the success of autotransplanted posterior teeth Ronchetti, Mirco F. Valdec, Silvio Pandis, Nikolaos Locher, Michael van Waes, Hubertus Prog Orthod Research BACKGROUND: Survival and success rates of tooth transplantations even after long follow-up periods have been shown to be very high. Nevertheless, it is important to analyse factors potentially influencing these rates. The aim of this study was to assess the influence on success of potential factors. METHODS: The research was based on a retrospective analysis of clinical and radiological data from a sample of 59 subjects (75 transplanted teeth). The follow-up period varied from 0.44 to 12.28 years (mean 3.95 years). Success rates were calculated and depicted with Kaplan-Meier plots. Log-rank tests were used to analyse the effect of root development stage, apex width, the use of enamel matrix proteins or the surgeon on success of transplantations. RESULTS: Results for success of premolar transplantations were comparable with already published data, while molars performed worse than shown in other studies. The surgeon performing the transplantation (p = 0.001) and tooth type (p ≤ 0.001) were significantly associated with transplantation success. Use of enamel matrix proteins (p = 0.10), root development stage (p = 0.13), the recipient area (p = 0.48) and apex width (p = 0.59) were not significantly associated with success. CONCLUSIONS: Molar transplantations were not as successful as premolar transplantations; however, success rates varied greatly depending on the surgeon’s experience. The use of enamel matrix proteins as well as root development stage, the recipient area and apex width did not show significant associations with success of tooth transplantations. Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2015-11-23 /pmc/articles/PMC4656252/ /pubmed/26597642 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40510-015-0112-y Text en © Ronchetti et al. 2015 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. |
spellingShingle | Research Ronchetti, Mirco F. Valdec, Silvio Pandis, Nikolaos Locher, Michael van Waes, Hubertus A retrospective analysis of factors influencing the success of autotransplanted posterior teeth |
title | A retrospective analysis of factors influencing the success of autotransplanted posterior teeth |
title_full | A retrospective analysis of factors influencing the success of autotransplanted posterior teeth |
title_fullStr | A retrospective analysis of factors influencing the success of autotransplanted posterior teeth |
title_full_unstemmed | A retrospective analysis of factors influencing the success of autotransplanted posterior teeth |
title_short | A retrospective analysis of factors influencing the success of autotransplanted posterior teeth |
title_sort | retrospective analysis of factors influencing the success of autotransplanted posterior teeth |
topic | Research |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4656252/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26597642 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40510-015-0112-y |
work_keys_str_mv | AT ronchettimircof aretrospectiveanalysisoffactorsinfluencingthesuccessofautotransplantedposteriorteeth AT valdecsilvio aretrospectiveanalysisoffactorsinfluencingthesuccessofautotransplantedposteriorteeth AT pandisnikolaos aretrospectiveanalysisoffactorsinfluencingthesuccessofautotransplantedposteriorteeth AT lochermichael aretrospectiveanalysisoffactorsinfluencingthesuccessofautotransplantedposteriorteeth AT vanwaeshubertus aretrospectiveanalysisoffactorsinfluencingthesuccessofautotransplantedposteriorteeth AT ronchettimircof retrospectiveanalysisoffactorsinfluencingthesuccessofautotransplantedposteriorteeth AT valdecsilvio retrospectiveanalysisoffactorsinfluencingthesuccessofautotransplantedposteriorteeth AT pandisnikolaos retrospectiveanalysisoffactorsinfluencingthesuccessofautotransplantedposteriorteeth AT lochermichael retrospectiveanalysisoffactorsinfluencingthesuccessofautotransplantedposteriorteeth AT vanwaeshubertus retrospectiveanalysisoffactorsinfluencingthesuccessofautotransplantedposteriorteeth |