Cargando…

Prospective evaluation of outcome of percutaneous nephrolithotomy using the ‘STONE’ nephrolithometry score: A single-centre experience

OBJECTIVE: To assess the prediction of stone clearance and complications of percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PCNL) using the ‘STONE’ nephrolithometry score, assessing stone size, tract length (skin-to-stone distance), degree of obstruction, number of calyces involved and stone essence (density). PATIEN...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Farhan, Muhammad, Nazim, Syed M., Salam, Basit, Ather, M. Hammad
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Elsevier 2015
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4656797/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26609445
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.aju.2015.07.006
_version_ 1782402278154567680
author Farhan, Muhammad
Nazim, Syed M.
Salam, Basit
Ather, M. Hammad
author_facet Farhan, Muhammad
Nazim, Syed M.
Salam, Basit
Ather, M. Hammad
author_sort Farhan, Muhammad
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVE: To assess the prediction of stone clearance and complications of percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PCNL) using the ‘STONE’ nephrolithometry score, assessing stone size, tract length (skin-to-stone distance), degree of obstruction, number of calyces involved and stone essence (density). PATIENTS AND METHODS: This was a prospective study of patients undergoing single-tract PCNL while prone, conducted at a university hospital. All patients had non-contrast-enhanced computed tomography within 3 weeks of the procedure. Only patients with a unilateral procedure and radio-opaque stones were included. The five variables of the STONE nephrolithometry score were calculated before the procedure. The stone-free rates were assessed with a plain abdominal film at 4 weeks and complications were graded using the modified Clavien system. RESULTS: In all, 107 patients were included in the final analysis. Overall, 80% of patients were rendered stone-free. Among the individual variables, a larger stone (P = 0.002) and the involvement of multiple calyces (P = 0.04) were associated with residual stones, while tract length (skin-to-stone distance), stone density and presence of hydronephrosis were not. Patients who were rendered stone-free had a statistically significant lower overall STONE score than those with residual stones, at 7.24 vs. 8.14 (P = 0.02). The score also correlated with operative duration, which was significantly longer with a higher STONE score (P = 0.03). The complication rate was 18% and most complications were Clavien grade 2, with bleeding requiring a blood transfusion (11 patients) being the commonest. There were no deaths within 30 days of surgery, but there was no correlation between the STONE score and complications. CONCLUSION: The STONE nephrolithometry score is a simple and easy to apply system for predicting complexity in stone clearance with PCNL.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4656797
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2015
publisher Elsevier
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-46567972015-11-25 Prospective evaluation of outcome of percutaneous nephrolithotomy using the ‘STONE’ nephrolithometry score: A single-centre experience Farhan, Muhammad Nazim, Syed M. Salam, Basit Ather, M. Hammad Arab J Urol Original Article OBJECTIVE: To assess the prediction of stone clearance and complications of percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PCNL) using the ‘STONE’ nephrolithometry score, assessing stone size, tract length (skin-to-stone distance), degree of obstruction, number of calyces involved and stone essence (density). PATIENTS AND METHODS: This was a prospective study of patients undergoing single-tract PCNL while prone, conducted at a university hospital. All patients had non-contrast-enhanced computed tomography within 3 weeks of the procedure. Only patients with a unilateral procedure and radio-opaque stones were included. The five variables of the STONE nephrolithometry score were calculated before the procedure. The stone-free rates were assessed with a plain abdominal film at 4 weeks and complications were graded using the modified Clavien system. RESULTS: In all, 107 patients were included in the final analysis. Overall, 80% of patients were rendered stone-free. Among the individual variables, a larger stone (P = 0.002) and the involvement of multiple calyces (P = 0.04) were associated with residual stones, while tract length (skin-to-stone distance), stone density and presence of hydronephrosis were not. Patients who were rendered stone-free had a statistically significant lower overall STONE score than those with residual stones, at 7.24 vs. 8.14 (P = 0.02). The score also correlated with operative duration, which was significantly longer with a higher STONE score (P = 0.03). The complication rate was 18% and most complications were Clavien grade 2, with bleeding requiring a blood transfusion (11 patients) being the commonest. There were no deaths within 30 days of surgery, but there was no correlation between the STONE score and complications. CONCLUSION: The STONE nephrolithometry score is a simple and easy to apply system for predicting complexity in stone clearance with PCNL. Elsevier 2015-12 2015-08-29 /pmc/articles/PMC4656797/ /pubmed/26609445 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.aju.2015.07.006 Text en © 2015 Arab Association of Urology. Production and hosting by Elsevier B.V. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/).
spellingShingle Original Article
Farhan, Muhammad
Nazim, Syed M.
Salam, Basit
Ather, M. Hammad
Prospective evaluation of outcome of percutaneous nephrolithotomy using the ‘STONE’ nephrolithometry score: A single-centre experience
title Prospective evaluation of outcome of percutaneous nephrolithotomy using the ‘STONE’ nephrolithometry score: A single-centre experience
title_full Prospective evaluation of outcome of percutaneous nephrolithotomy using the ‘STONE’ nephrolithometry score: A single-centre experience
title_fullStr Prospective evaluation of outcome of percutaneous nephrolithotomy using the ‘STONE’ nephrolithometry score: A single-centre experience
title_full_unstemmed Prospective evaluation of outcome of percutaneous nephrolithotomy using the ‘STONE’ nephrolithometry score: A single-centre experience
title_short Prospective evaluation of outcome of percutaneous nephrolithotomy using the ‘STONE’ nephrolithometry score: A single-centre experience
title_sort prospective evaluation of outcome of percutaneous nephrolithotomy using the ‘stone’ nephrolithometry score: a single-centre experience
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4656797/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26609445
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.aju.2015.07.006
work_keys_str_mv AT farhanmuhammad prospectiveevaluationofoutcomeofpercutaneousnephrolithotomyusingthestonenephrolithometryscoreasinglecentreexperience
AT nazimsyedm prospectiveevaluationofoutcomeofpercutaneousnephrolithotomyusingthestonenephrolithometryscoreasinglecentreexperience
AT salambasit prospectiveevaluationofoutcomeofpercutaneousnephrolithotomyusingthestonenephrolithometryscoreasinglecentreexperience
AT athermhammad prospectiveevaluationofoutcomeofpercutaneousnephrolithotomyusingthestonenephrolithometryscoreasinglecentreexperience