Cargando…

Contemporary practice of testicular prosthesis insertion

OBJECTIVES: To assess the practice of testicular prosthesis insertion (TPI) related to orchidectomy in one geographical region and to identify the difference in the rates of insertion among different age groups. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Males who underwent orchidectomy between 1989 and 2009 were identi...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Mohammed, Aza, Yassin, Musaab, Hendry, David, Walker, Gregory
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Elsevier 2015
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4656801/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26609448
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.aju.2015.09.001
_version_ 1782402279065780224
author Mohammed, Aza
Yassin, Musaab
Hendry, David
Walker, Gregory
author_facet Mohammed, Aza
Yassin, Musaab
Hendry, David
Walker, Gregory
author_sort Mohammed, Aza
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVES: To assess the practice of testicular prosthesis insertion (TPI) related to orchidectomy in one geographical region and to identify the difference in the rates of insertion among different age groups. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Males who underwent orchidectomy between 1989 and 2009 were identified from data collected from Scottish Morbidity Records. Patients were classified into six age groups. The TPI rate and relation to original orchidectomy were analysed according to different age groups. RESULTS: In all, 3364 patients underwent orchidectomy in the 20-year period of the study. The most common indications for orchidectomy were atrophy, undescended testes, torsion, and tumour. In the same period, 530 patients had a TPI, with 59.4% of them (316 patients) having TPI at initial surgery, 17.3% (92) as a second surgical procedure, and 22.8% (122) having the TPI without prior history of orchidectomy. Among patients who underwent TPI, postpubertal males were more likely to have simultaneous insertion at the time of orchidectomy than prepubertal males (83% vs 32%; odds ratio 10.44, 95% confidence interval 5.23–20.82; P < 0.01). CONCLUSION: Younger males are more likely to have TPI at a later date. Paediatric urologists should be mindful of the possibility of concurrent TPI at the time of initial scrotal/groin exploration.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4656801
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2015
publisher Elsevier
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-46568012015-11-25 Contemporary practice of testicular prosthesis insertion Mohammed, Aza Yassin, Musaab Hendry, David Walker, Gregory Arab J Urol Original Article OBJECTIVES: To assess the practice of testicular prosthesis insertion (TPI) related to orchidectomy in one geographical region and to identify the difference in the rates of insertion among different age groups. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Males who underwent orchidectomy between 1989 and 2009 were identified from data collected from Scottish Morbidity Records. Patients were classified into six age groups. The TPI rate and relation to original orchidectomy were analysed according to different age groups. RESULTS: In all, 3364 patients underwent orchidectomy in the 20-year period of the study. The most common indications for orchidectomy were atrophy, undescended testes, torsion, and tumour. In the same period, 530 patients had a TPI, with 59.4% of them (316 patients) having TPI at initial surgery, 17.3% (92) as a second surgical procedure, and 22.8% (122) having the TPI without prior history of orchidectomy. Among patients who underwent TPI, postpubertal males were more likely to have simultaneous insertion at the time of orchidectomy than prepubertal males (83% vs 32%; odds ratio 10.44, 95% confidence interval 5.23–20.82; P < 0.01). CONCLUSION: Younger males are more likely to have TPI at a later date. Paediatric urologists should be mindful of the possibility of concurrent TPI at the time of initial scrotal/groin exploration. Elsevier 2015-12 2015-10-13 /pmc/articles/PMC4656801/ /pubmed/26609448 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.aju.2015.09.001 Text en © 2015 Arab Association of Urology. Production and hosting by Elsevier B.V. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/).
spellingShingle Original Article
Mohammed, Aza
Yassin, Musaab
Hendry, David
Walker, Gregory
Contemporary practice of testicular prosthesis insertion
title Contemporary practice of testicular prosthesis insertion
title_full Contemporary practice of testicular prosthesis insertion
title_fullStr Contemporary practice of testicular prosthesis insertion
title_full_unstemmed Contemporary practice of testicular prosthesis insertion
title_short Contemporary practice of testicular prosthesis insertion
title_sort contemporary practice of testicular prosthesis insertion
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4656801/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26609448
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.aju.2015.09.001
work_keys_str_mv AT mohammedaza contemporarypracticeoftesticularprosthesisinsertion
AT yassinmusaab contemporarypracticeoftesticularprosthesisinsertion
AT hendrydavid contemporarypracticeoftesticularprosthesisinsertion
AT walkergregory contemporarypracticeoftesticularprosthesisinsertion