Cargando…

The Memory System Engaged During Acquisition Determines the Effectiveness of Different Extinction Protocols

Previous research indicates that extinction of rodent maze behavior may occur without explicit performance of the previously acquired response. In latent extinction, confining an animal to a previously rewarded goal location without reinforcement is typically sufficient to produce extinction of maze...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Goodman, Jarid, Packard, Mark G.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Frontiers Media S.A. 2015
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4657229/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26635564
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fnbeh.2015.00314
_version_ 1782402358073884672
author Goodman, Jarid
Packard, Mark G.
author_facet Goodman, Jarid
Packard, Mark G.
author_sort Goodman, Jarid
collection PubMed
description Previous research indicates that extinction of rodent maze behavior may occur without explicit performance of the previously acquired response. In latent extinction, confining an animal to a previously rewarded goal location without reinforcement is typically sufficient to produce extinction of maze learning. However, previous studies have not determined whether latent extinction may be successfully employed to extinguish all types of memory acquired in the maze, or whether only specific types of memory may be vulnerable to latent extinction. The present study examined whether latent extinction may be effective across two plus-maze tasks that depend on anatomically distinct neural systems. Adult male Long-Evans rats were trained in a hippocampus-dependent place learning task (Experiment 1), in which animals were trained to approach a consistent spatial location for food reward. A separate group of rats were trained in a dorsolateral striatum-dependent response learning task (Experiment 2), in which animals were trained to make a consistent egocentric body-turn response for food reward. Following training, animals received response extinction or latent extinction. For response extinction, animals were given the opportunity to execute the original running approach response toward the empty food cup. For latent extinction, animals were confined to the original goal locations with the empty food cup, thus preventing them from making the original running approach response. Results indicate that, relative to no extinction, latent extinction was effective at extinguishing memory in the place learning task, but remained ineffective in the response learning task. In contrast, typical response extinction remained very effective at extinguishing memory in both place and response learning tasks. The present findings confirm that extinction of maze learning may occur with or without overt performance of the previously acquired response, but that the effectiveness of latent extinction may depend on the type of memory being extinguished. The findings suggest that behavioral treatments modeled after response extinction protocols may be especially useful in alleviating human psychopathologies involving striatum-dependent memory processes (e.g., drug addiction and relapse).
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4657229
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2015
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-46572292015-12-03 The Memory System Engaged During Acquisition Determines the Effectiveness of Different Extinction Protocols Goodman, Jarid Packard, Mark G. Front Behav Neurosci Neuroscience Previous research indicates that extinction of rodent maze behavior may occur without explicit performance of the previously acquired response. In latent extinction, confining an animal to a previously rewarded goal location without reinforcement is typically sufficient to produce extinction of maze learning. However, previous studies have not determined whether latent extinction may be successfully employed to extinguish all types of memory acquired in the maze, or whether only specific types of memory may be vulnerable to latent extinction. The present study examined whether latent extinction may be effective across two plus-maze tasks that depend on anatomically distinct neural systems. Adult male Long-Evans rats were trained in a hippocampus-dependent place learning task (Experiment 1), in which animals were trained to approach a consistent spatial location for food reward. A separate group of rats were trained in a dorsolateral striatum-dependent response learning task (Experiment 2), in which animals were trained to make a consistent egocentric body-turn response for food reward. Following training, animals received response extinction or latent extinction. For response extinction, animals were given the opportunity to execute the original running approach response toward the empty food cup. For latent extinction, animals were confined to the original goal locations with the empty food cup, thus preventing them from making the original running approach response. Results indicate that, relative to no extinction, latent extinction was effective at extinguishing memory in the place learning task, but remained ineffective in the response learning task. In contrast, typical response extinction remained very effective at extinguishing memory in both place and response learning tasks. The present findings confirm that extinction of maze learning may occur with or without overt performance of the previously acquired response, but that the effectiveness of latent extinction may depend on the type of memory being extinguished. The findings suggest that behavioral treatments modeled after response extinction protocols may be especially useful in alleviating human psychopathologies involving striatum-dependent memory processes (e.g., drug addiction and relapse). Frontiers Media S.A. 2015-11-24 /pmc/articles/PMC4657229/ /pubmed/26635564 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fnbeh.2015.00314 Text en Copyright © 2015 Goodman and Packard. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution and reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
spellingShingle Neuroscience
Goodman, Jarid
Packard, Mark G.
The Memory System Engaged During Acquisition Determines the Effectiveness of Different Extinction Protocols
title The Memory System Engaged During Acquisition Determines the Effectiveness of Different Extinction Protocols
title_full The Memory System Engaged During Acquisition Determines the Effectiveness of Different Extinction Protocols
title_fullStr The Memory System Engaged During Acquisition Determines the Effectiveness of Different Extinction Protocols
title_full_unstemmed The Memory System Engaged During Acquisition Determines the Effectiveness of Different Extinction Protocols
title_short The Memory System Engaged During Acquisition Determines the Effectiveness of Different Extinction Protocols
title_sort memory system engaged during acquisition determines the effectiveness of different extinction protocols
topic Neuroscience
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4657229/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26635564
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fnbeh.2015.00314
work_keys_str_mv AT goodmanjarid thememorysystemengagedduringacquisitiondeterminestheeffectivenessofdifferentextinctionprotocols
AT packardmarkg thememorysystemengagedduringacquisitiondeterminestheeffectivenessofdifferentextinctionprotocols
AT goodmanjarid memorysystemengagedduringacquisitiondeterminestheeffectivenessofdifferentextinctionprotocols
AT packardmarkg memorysystemengagedduringacquisitiondeterminestheeffectivenessofdifferentextinctionprotocols