Cargando…

Are clinical measures of foot posture and mobility associated with foot kinematics when walking?

BACKGROUND: There is uncertainty as to which foot posture measures are the most valid in terms of predicting kinematics of the foot. The aim of this study was to investigate the associations of clinical measures of static foot posture and mobility with foot kinematics during barefoot walking. METHOD...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Buldt, Andrew K., Murley, George S., Levinger, Pazit, Menz, Hylton B., Nester, Christopher J., Landorf, Karl B.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2015
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4657281/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26604987
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13047-015-0122-5
_version_ 1782402369909161984
author Buldt, Andrew K.
Murley, George S.
Levinger, Pazit
Menz, Hylton B.
Nester, Christopher J.
Landorf, Karl B.
author_facet Buldt, Andrew K.
Murley, George S.
Levinger, Pazit
Menz, Hylton B.
Nester, Christopher J.
Landorf, Karl B.
author_sort Buldt, Andrew K.
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: There is uncertainty as to which foot posture measures are the most valid in terms of predicting kinematics of the foot. The aim of this study was to investigate the associations of clinical measures of static foot posture and mobility with foot kinematics during barefoot walking. METHOD: Foot posture and mobility were measured in 97 healthy adults (46 males, 51 females; mean age 24.4 ± 6.2 years). Foot posture was assessed using the 6-item Foot Posture Index (FPI), Arch Index (AI), Normalised Navicular Height (NNHt) and Normalised Dorsal Arch Height (DAH). Foot mobility was evaluated using the Foot Mobility Magnitude (FMM) measure. Following this, a five-segment foot model was used to measure tri-planar motion of the rearfoot, midfoot, medial forefoot, lateral forefoot and hallux. Peak and range of motion variables during load acceptance and midstance/propulsion phases of gait were extracted for all relative segment to segment motion calculations. Hierarchical regression analyses were conducted, adjusting for potential confounding variables. RESULTS: The degree of variance in peak and range of motion kinematic variables that was independently explained by foot posture measures was as follows: FPI 5 to 22 %, NNHt 6 to 20 %, AI 7 to 13 %, DAH 6 to 8 %, and FMM 8 %. The FPI was retained as a significant predictor across the most number of kinematic variables. However, the amount of variance explained by the FPI for individual kinematic variables did not exceed other measures. Overall, static foot posture measures were more strongly associated with kinematic variables than foot mobility measures and explained more variation in peak variables compared to range of motion variables. CONCLUSIONS: Foot posture measures can explain only a small amount of variation in foot kinematics. Static foot posture measures, and in particular the FPI, were more strongly associated with foot kinematics compared with foot mobility measures. These findings suggest that foot kinematics cannot be accurately inferred from clinical observations of foot posture alone. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (doi:10.1186/s13047-015-0122-5) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4657281
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2015
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-46572812015-11-25 Are clinical measures of foot posture and mobility associated with foot kinematics when walking? Buldt, Andrew K. Murley, George S. Levinger, Pazit Menz, Hylton B. Nester, Christopher J. Landorf, Karl B. J Foot Ankle Res Research BACKGROUND: There is uncertainty as to which foot posture measures are the most valid in terms of predicting kinematics of the foot. The aim of this study was to investigate the associations of clinical measures of static foot posture and mobility with foot kinematics during barefoot walking. METHOD: Foot posture and mobility were measured in 97 healthy adults (46 males, 51 females; mean age 24.4 ± 6.2 years). Foot posture was assessed using the 6-item Foot Posture Index (FPI), Arch Index (AI), Normalised Navicular Height (NNHt) and Normalised Dorsal Arch Height (DAH). Foot mobility was evaluated using the Foot Mobility Magnitude (FMM) measure. Following this, a five-segment foot model was used to measure tri-planar motion of the rearfoot, midfoot, medial forefoot, lateral forefoot and hallux. Peak and range of motion variables during load acceptance and midstance/propulsion phases of gait were extracted for all relative segment to segment motion calculations. Hierarchical regression analyses were conducted, adjusting for potential confounding variables. RESULTS: The degree of variance in peak and range of motion kinematic variables that was independently explained by foot posture measures was as follows: FPI 5 to 22 %, NNHt 6 to 20 %, AI 7 to 13 %, DAH 6 to 8 %, and FMM 8 %. The FPI was retained as a significant predictor across the most number of kinematic variables. However, the amount of variance explained by the FPI for individual kinematic variables did not exceed other measures. Overall, static foot posture measures were more strongly associated with kinematic variables than foot mobility measures and explained more variation in peak variables compared to range of motion variables. CONCLUSIONS: Foot posture measures can explain only a small amount of variation in foot kinematics. Static foot posture measures, and in particular the FPI, were more strongly associated with foot kinematics compared with foot mobility measures. These findings suggest that foot kinematics cannot be accurately inferred from clinical observations of foot posture alone. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (doi:10.1186/s13047-015-0122-5) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. BioMed Central 2015-11-24 /pmc/articles/PMC4657281/ /pubmed/26604987 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13047-015-0122-5 Text en © Buldt et al. 2015 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Research
Buldt, Andrew K.
Murley, George S.
Levinger, Pazit
Menz, Hylton B.
Nester, Christopher J.
Landorf, Karl B.
Are clinical measures of foot posture and mobility associated with foot kinematics when walking?
title Are clinical measures of foot posture and mobility associated with foot kinematics when walking?
title_full Are clinical measures of foot posture and mobility associated with foot kinematics when walking?
title_fullStr Are clinical measures of foot posture and mobility associated with foot kinematics when walking?
title_full_unstemmed Are clinical measures of foot posture and mobility associated with foot kinematics when walking?
title_short Are clinical measures of foot posture and mobility associated with foot kinematics when walking?
title_sort are clinical measures of foot posture and mobility associated with foot kinematics when walking?
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4657281/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26604987
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13047-015-0122-5
work_keys_str_mv AT buldtandrewk areclinicalmeasuresoffootpostureandmobilityassociatedwithfootkinematicswhenwalking
AT murleygeorges areclinicalmeasuresoffootpostureandmobilityassociatedwithfootkinematicswhenwalking
AT levingerpazit areclinicalmeasuresoffootpostureandmobilityassociatedwithfootkinematicswhenwalking
AT menzhyltonb areclinicalmeasuresoffootpostureandmobilityassociatedwithfootkinematicswhenwalking
AT nesterchristopherj areclinicalmeasuresoffootpostureandmobilityassociatedwithfootkinematicswhenwalking
AT landorfkarlb areclinicalmeasuresoffootpostureandmobilityassociatedwithfootkinematicswhenwalking