Cargando…

Telemedicine for general practice: a systematic review protocol

BACKGROUND: The use of information technology in healthcare is fast becoming an alternative and supporting method of providing many forms of services in a healthcare and health management setting. Telephone technology is used readily to deliver services such as disease management, consultations and...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Downes, Martin J., Mervin, Merehau C., Byrnes, Joshua M., Scuffham, Paul A.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2015
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4657341/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26597992
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13643-015-0115-2
_version_ 1782402380321521664
author Downes, Martin J.
Mervin, Merehau C.
Byrnes, Joshua M.
Scuffham, Paul A.
author_facet Downes, Martin J.
Mervin, Merehau C.
Byrnes, Joshua M.
Scuffham, Paul A.
author_sort Downes, Martin J.
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: The use of information technology in healthcare is fast becoming an alternative and supporting method of providing many forms of services in a healthcare and health management setting. Telephone technology is used readily to deliver services such as disease management, consultations and behaviour coaching. Telemedicine provides a promising alternative and supporting service for face-to-face general practice care. The aim of this review is to utilise a systematic review to collate evidence on the use of telemedicine as a lead in and an alternative to general practice visits. METHODS/DESIGN: A systematic search of MEDLINE, CINAHL, the Cochrane Library and the International Clinical Trials Registry Platform will be performed using the search terms for the intervention (telemedicine) and the comparator (general practice) to search the databases. The systematic review aims to identify randomised control trials; however, if none are identified, an updated search will be conducted to identify lower levels of evidence. Papers will be reviewed and assessed for quality and data extracted using two reviewers; if consensus is required, a third reviewer will be consulted. If applicable, a meta-analysis of relevant outcomes will be conducted. The protocol has been reported according to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses protocols (PRISMA-P) guidelines. DISCUSSION: The intervention and comparator have the potential to provide a vast range of healthcare services to a range of diseases and health conditions. There is likely to be difficulty in identifying relevant clinical outcome measures for the patient population. A range of outcome measures will therefore be collected in the data extraction phase. SYSTEMATIC REVIEW REGISTRATION: PROSPERO CRD42015025225 ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (doi:10.1186/s13643-015-0115-2) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4657341
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2015
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-46573412015-11-25 Telemedicine for general practice: a systematic review protocol Downes, Martin J. Mervin, Merehau C. Byrnes, Joshua M. Scuffham, Paul A. Syst Rev Protocol BACKGROUND: The use of information technology in healthcare is fast becoming an alternative and supporting method of providing many forms of services in a healthcare and health management setting. Telephone technology is used readily to deliver services such as disease management, consultations and behaviour coaching. Telemedicine provides a promising alternative and supporting service for face-to-face general practice care. The aim of this review is to utilise a systematic review to collate evidence on the use of telemedicine as a lead in and an alternative to general practice visits. METHODS/DESIGN: A systematic search of MEDLINE, CINAHL, the Cochrane Library and the International Clinical Trials Registry Platform will be performed using the search terms for the intervention (telemedicine) and the comparator (general practice) to search the databases. The systematic review aims to identify randomised control trials; however, if none are identified, an updated search will be conducted to identify lower levels of evidence. Papers will be reviewed and assessed for quality and data extracted using two reviewers; if consensus is required, a third reviewer will be consulted. If applicable, a meta-analysis of relevant outcomes will be conducted. The protocol has been reported according to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses protocols (PRISMA-P) guidelines. DISCUSSION: The intervention and comparator have the potential to provide a vast range of healthcare services to a range of diseases and health conditions. There is likely to be difficulty in identifying relevant clinical outcome measures for the patient population. A range of outcome measures will therefore be collected in the data extraction phase. SYSTEMATIC REVIEW REGISTRATION: PROSPERO CRD42015025225 ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (doi:10.1186/s13643-015-0115-2) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. BioMed Central 2015-10-05 /pmc/articles/PMC4657341/ /pubmed/26597992 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13643-015-0115-2 Text en © Downes et al. 2015 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Protocol
Downes, Martin J.
Mervin, Merehau C.
Byrnes, Joshua M.
Scuffham, Paul A.
Telemedicine for general practice: a systematic review protocol
title Telemedicine for general practice: a systematic review protocol
title_full Telemedicine for general practice: a systematic review protocol
title_fullStr Telemedicine for general practice: a systematic review protocol
title_full_unstemmed Telemedicine for general practice: a systematic review protocol
title_short Telemedicine for general practice: a systematic review protocol
title_sort telemedicine for general practice: a systematic review protocol
topic Protocol
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4657341/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26597992
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13643-015-0115-2
work_keys_str_mv AT downesmartinj telemedicineforgeneralpracticeasystematicreviewprotocol
AT mervinmerehauc telemedicineforgeneralpracticeasystematicreviewprotocol
AT byrnesjoshuam telemedicineforgeneralpracticeasystematicreviewprotocol
AT scuffhampaula telemedicineforgeneralpracticeasystematicreviewprotocol