Cargando…
The relationship between stochastic and deterministic quasi-steady state approximations
BACKGROUND: The quasi steady-state approximation (QSSA) is frequently used to reduce deterministic models of biochemical networks. The resulting equations provide a simplified description of the network in terms of non-elementary reaction functions (e.g. Hill functions). Such deterministic reduction...
Autores principales: | , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2015
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4657384/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26597159 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12918-015-0218-3 |
_version_ | 1782402390169747456 |
---|---|
author | Kim, Jae Kyoung Josić, Krešimir Bennett, Matthew R. |
author_facet | Kim, Jae Kyoung Josić, Krešimir Bennett, Matthew R. |
author_sort | Kim, Jae Kyoung |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: The quasi steady-state approximation (QSSA) is frequently used to reduce deterministic models of biochemical networks. The resulting equations provide a simplified description of the network in terms of non-elementary reaction functions (e.g. Hill functions). Such deterministic reductions are frequently a basis for heuristic stochastic models in which non-elementary reaction functions are used to define reaction propensities. Despite their popularity, it remains unclear when such stochastic reductions are valid. It is frequently assumed that the stochastic reduction can be trusted whenever its deterministic counterpart is accurate. However, a number of recent examples show that this is not necessarily the case. RESULTS: Here we explain the origin of these discrepancies, and demonstrate a clear relationship between the accuracy of the deterministic and the stochastic QSSA for examples widely used in biological systems. With an analysis of a two-state promoter model, and numerical simulations for a variety of other models, we find that the stochastic QSSA is accurate whenever its deterministic counterpart provides an accurate approximation over a range of initial conditions which cover the likely fluctuations from the quasi steady-state (QSS). We conjecture that this relationship provides a simple and computationally inexpensive way to test the accuracy of reduced stochastic models using deterministic simulations. CONCLUSIONS: The stochastic QSSA is one of the most popular multi-scale stochastic simulation methods. While the use of QSSA, and the resulting non-elementary functions has been justified in the deterministic case, it is not clear when their stochastic counterparts are accurate. In this study, we show how the accuracy of the stochastic QSSA can be tested using their deterministic counterparts providing a concrete method to test when non-elementary rate functions can be used in stochastic simulations. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (doi:10.1186/s12918-015-0218-3) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-4657384 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2015 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-46573842015-11-25 The relationship between stochastic and deterministic quasi-steady state approximations Kim, Jae Kyoung Josić, Krešimir Bennett, Matthew R. BMC Syst Biol Research Article BACKGROUND: The quasi steady-state approximation (QSSA) is frequently used to reduce deterministic models of biochemical networks. The resulting equations provide a simplified description of the network in terms of non-elementary reaction functions (e.g. Hill functions). Such deterministic reductions are frequently a basis for heuristic stochastic models in which non-elementary reaction functions are used to define reaction propensities. Despite their popularity, it remains unclear when such stochastic reductions are valid. It is frequently assumed that the stochastic reduction can be trusted whenever its deterministic counterpart is accurate. However, a number of recent examples show that this is not necessarily the case. RESULTS: Here we explain the origin of these discrepancies, and demonstrate a clear relationship between the accuracy of the deterministic and the stochastic QSSA for examples widely used in biological systems. With an analysis of a two-state promoter model, and numerical simulations for a variety of other models, we find that the stochastic QSSA is accurate whenever its deterministic counterpart provides an accurate approximation over a range of initial conditions which cover the likely fluctuations from the quasi steady-state (QSS). We conjecture that this relationship provides a simple and computationally inexpensive way to test the accuracy of reduced stochastic models using deterministic simulations. CONCLUSIONS: The stochastic QSSA is one of the most popular multi-scale stochastic simulation methods. While the use of QSSA, and the resulting non-elementary functions has been justified in the deterministic case, it is not clear when their stochastic counterparts are accurate. In this study, we show how the accuracy of the stochastic QSSA can be tested using their deterministic counterparts providing a concrete method to test when non-elementary rate functions can be used in stochastic simulations. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (doi:10.1186/s12918-015-0218-3) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. BioMed Central 2015-11-23 /pmc/articles/PMC4657384/ /pubmed/26597159 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12918-015-0218-3 Text en © Kim et al. 2015 Open Access This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License(http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver(http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated. |
spellingShingle | Research Article Kim, Jae Kyoung Josić, Krešimir Bennett, Matthew R. The relationship between stochastic and deterministic quasi-steady state approximations |
title | The relationship between stochastic and deterministic quasi-steady state approximations |
title_full | The relationship between stochastic and deterministic quasi-steady state approximations |
title_fullStr | The relationship between stochastic and deterministic quasi-steady state approximations |
title_full_unstemmed | The relationship between stochastic and deterministic quasi-steady state approximations |
title_short | The relationship between stochastic and deterministic quasi-steady state approximations |
title_sort | relationship between stochastic and deterministic quasi-steady state approximations |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4657384/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26597159 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12918-015-0218-3 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT kimjaekyoung therelationshipbetweenstochasticanddeterministicquasisteadystateapproximations AT josickresimir therelationshipbetweenstochasticanddeterministicquasisteadystateapproximations AT bennettmatthewr therelationshipbetweenstochasticanddeterministicquasisteadystateapproximations AT kimjaekyoung relationshipbetweenstochasticanddeterministicquasisteadystateapproximations AT josickresimir relationshipbetweenstochasticanddeterministicquasisteadystateapproximations AT bennettmatthewr relationshipbetweenstochasticanddeterministicquasisteadystateapproximations |