Cargando…
Does incentive-elicited nucleus accumbens activation differ by substance of abuse? An examination with adolescents
Numerous questions surround the nature of reward processing in the developing adolescent brain, particularly in regard to polysubstance use. We therefore sought to examine incentive-elicited brain activation in the context of three common substances of abuse (cannabis, tobacco, and alcohol). Due to...
Autores principales: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Elsevier
2015
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4657439/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26070843 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.dcn.2015.05.005 |
_version_ | 1782402396337471488 |
---|---|
author | Karoly, Hollis C. Bryan, Angela D. Weiland, Barbara J. Mayer, Andrew Dodd, Andrew Feldstein Ewing, Sarah W. |
author_facet | Karoly, Hollis C. Bryan, Angela D. Weiland, Barbara J. Mayer, Andrew Dodd, Andrew Feldstein Ewing, Sarah W. |
author_sort | Karoly, Hollis C. |
collection | PubMed |
description | Numerous questions surround the nature of reward processing in the developing adolescent brain, particularly in regard to polysubstance use. We therefore sought to examine incentive-elicited brain activation in the context of three common substances of abuse (cannabis, tobacco, and alcohol). Due to the role of the nucleus accumbens (NAcc) in incentive processing, we compared activation in this region during anticipation of reward and loss using a monetary incentive delay (MID) task. Adolescents (ages 14–18; 66% male) were matched on age, gender, and frequency of use of any common substances within six distinct groups: cannabis-only (n = 14), tobacco-only (n = 34), alcohol-only (n = 12), cannabis + tobacco (n = 17), cannabis + tobacco + alcohol (n = 17), and non-using controls (n = 38). All groups showed comparable behavioral performance on the MID task. The tobacco-only group showed decreased bilateral nucleus accumbens (NAcc) activation during reward anticipation as compared to the alcohol-only group, the control group, and both polysubstance groups. Interestingly, no differences emerged between the cannabis-only group and any of the other groups. Results from this study suggest that youth who tend toward single-substance tobacco use may possess behavioral and/or neurobiological characteristics that differentiate them from both their substance-using and non-substance-using peers. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-4657439 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2015 |
publisher | Elsevier |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-46574392016-12-01 Does incentive-elicited nucleus accumbens activation differ by substance of abuse? An examination with adolescents Karoly, Hollis C. Bryan, Angela D. Weiland, Barbara J. Mayer, Andrew Dodd, Andrew Feldstein Ewing, Sarah W. Dev Cogn Neurosci Original Research Numerous questions surround the nature of reward processing in the developing adolescent brain, particularly in regard to polysubstance use. We therefore sought to examine incentive-elicited brain activation in the context of three common substances of abuse (cannabis, tobacco, and alcohol). Due to the role of the nucleus accumbens (NAcc) in incentive processing, we compared activation in this region during anticipation of reward and loss using a monetary incentive delay (MID) task. Adolescents (ages 14–18; 66% male) were matched on age, gender, and frequency of use of any common substances within six distinct groups: cannabis-only (n = 14), tobacco-only (n = 34), alcohol-only (n = 12), cannabis + tobacco (n = 17), cannabis + tobacco + alcohol (n = 17), and non-using controls (n = 38). All groups showed comparable behavioral performance on the MID task. The tobacco-only group showed decreased bilateral nucleus accumbens (NAcc) activation during reward anticipation as compared to the alcohol-only group, the control group, and both polysubstance groups. Interestingly, no differences emerged between the cannabis-only group and any of the other groups. Results from this study suggest that youth who tend toward single-substance tobacco use may possess behavioral and/or neurobiological characteristics that differentiate them from both their substance-using and non-substance-using peers. Elsevier 2015-05-23 /pmc/articles/PMC4657439/ /pubmed/26070843 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.dcn.2015.05.005 Text en © 2015 The Authors http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/). |
spellingShingle | Original Research Karoly, Hollis C. Bryan, Angela D. Weiland, Barbara J. Mayer, Andrew Dodd, Andrew Feldstein Ewing, Sarah W. Does incentive-elicited nucleus accumbens activation differ by substance of abuse? An examination with adolescents |
title | Does incentive-elicited nucleus accumbens activation differ by substance of abuse? An examination with adolescents |
title_full | Does incentive-elicited nucleus accumbens activation differ by substance of abuse? An examination with adolescents |
title_fullStr | Does incentive-elicited nucleus accumbens activation differ by substance of abuse? An examination with adolescents |
title_full_unstemmed | Does incentive-elicited nucleus accumbens activation differ by substance of abuse? An examination with adolescents |
title_short | Does incentive-elicited nucleus accumbens activation differ by substance of abuse? An examination with adolescents |
title_sort | does incentive-elicited nucleus accumbens activation differ by substance of abuse? an examination with adolescents |
topic | Original Research |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4657439/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26070843 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.dcn.2015.05.005 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT karolyhollisc doesincentiveelicitednucleusaccumbensactivationdifferbysubstanceofabuseanexaminationwithadolescents AT bryanangelad doesincentiveelicitednucleusaccumbensactivationdifferbysubstanceofabuseanexaminationwithadolescents AT weilandbarbaraj doesincentiveelicitednucleusaccumbensactivationdifferbysubstanceofabuseanexaminationwithadolescents AT mayerandrew doesincentiveelicitednucleusaccumbensactivationdifferbysubstanceofabuseanexaminationwithadolescents AT doddandrew doesincentiveelicitednucleusaccumbensactivationdifferbysubstanceofabuseanexaminationwithadolescents AT feldsteinewingsarahw doesincentiveelicitednucleusaccumbensactivationdifferbysubstanceofabuseanexaminationwithadolescents |