Cargando…

Treatment adherence in multiple sclerosis: a survey of Belgian neurologists

BACKGROUND: Poor treatment adherence is common among patients with multiple sclerosis (MS). This survey evaluated neurologists’ perception of treatment adherence among MS patients. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This questionnaire-based survey of Belgian neurologists treating MS patients was conducted betwe...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Decoo, Danny, Vokaer, Mathieu
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Dove Medical Press 2015
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4657795/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26640373
http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/PPA.S91973
_version_ 1782402422827646976
author Decoo, Danny
Vokaer, Mathieu
author_facet Decoo, Danny
Vokaer, Mathieu
author_sort Decoo, Danny
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Poor treatment adherence is common among patients with multiple sclerosis (MS). This survey evaluated neurologists’ perception of treatment adherence among MS patients. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This questionnaire-based survey of Belgian neurologists treating MS patients was conducted between June and July 2014. Face-to-face interviews with the neurologists were based on a semistructured questionnaire containing questions regarding the perception of the treatment-adherence level. RESULTS: A total of 41 neurologists participated in the survey. Of these, 88% indicated frequent discussions about treatment adherence as beneficial for treatment efficacy. The mean time spent on the treatment-adherence discussion during the initial consultation was 11 minutes, with 24% of doctors spending 5 minutes and 24% of doctors spending 10 minutes discussing this issue. The majority of neurologists (56%) perceived the adherence level in MS as good, and 12% perceived it as excellent. The majority of neurologists (64%) indicated intolerance as a main cause of poor adherence, and all neurologists reported insufficient efficacy as a consequence of nonadherence. The importance of adherence in the neurologists’ practice was evaluated on a scale of 1–10, with 1= “not very important” and 10= “very important”: 44% of doctors indicated a score of 10, and the mean score was 9.0. CONCLUSION: Belgian neurologists consider treatment adherence in MS as essential for the benefits of therapies. However, although neurologists are aware of the consequences of nonadherence, they generally spend limited time discussing the importance of treatment adherence with their patients.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4657795
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2015
publisher Dove Medical Press
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-46577952015-12-04 Treatment adherence in multiple sclerosis: a survey of Belgian neurologists Decoo, Danny Vokaer, Mathieu Patient Prefer Adherence Original Research BACKGROUND: Poor treatment adherence is common among patients with multiple sclerosis (MS). This survey evaluated neurologists’ perception of treatment adherence among MS patients. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This questionnaire-based survey of Belgian neurologists treating MS patients was conducted between June and July 2014. Face-to-face interviews with the neurologists were based on a semistructured questionnaire containing questions regarding the perception of the treatment-adherence level. RESULTS: A total of 41 neurologists participated in the survey. Of these, 88% indicated frequent discussions about treatment adherence as beneficial for treatment efficacy. The mean time spent on the treatment-adherence discussion during the initial consultation was 11 minutes, with 24% of doctors spending 5 minutes and 24% of doctors spending 10 minutes discussing this issue. The majority of neurologists (56%) perceived the adherence level in MS as good, and 12% perceived it as excellent. The majority of neurologists (64%) indicated intolerance as a main cause of poor adherence, and all neurologists reported insufficient efficacy as a consequence of nonadherence. The importance of adherence in the neurologists’ practice was evaluated on a scale of 1–10, with 1= “not very important” and 10= “very important”: 44% of doctors indicated a score of 10, and the mean score was 9.0. CONCLUSION: Belgian neurologists consider treatment adherence in MS as essential for the benefits of therapies. However, although neurologists are aware of the consequences of nonadherence, they generally spend limited time discussing the importance of treatment adherence with their patients. Dove Medical Press 2015-11-19 /pmc/articles/PMC4657795/ /pubmed/26640373 http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/PPA.S91973 Text en © 2015 Decoo and Vokaer. This work is published by Dove Medical Press Limited, and licensed under Creative Commons Attribution – Non Commercial (unported, v3.0) License The full terms of the License are available at http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/. Non-commercial uses of the work are permitted without any further permission from Dove Medical Press Limited, provided the work is properly attributed.
spellingShingle Original Research
Decoo, Danny
Vokaer, Mathieu
Treatment adherence in multiple sclerosis: a survey of Belgian neurologists
title Treatment adherence in multiple sclerosis: a survey of Belgian neurologists
title_full Treatment adherence in multiple sclerosis: a survey of Belgian neurologists
title_fullStr Treatment adherence in multiple sclerosis: a survey of Belgian neurologists
title_full_unstemmed Treatment adherence in multiple sclerosis: a survey of Belgian neurologists
title_short Treatment adherence in multiple sclerosis: a survey of Belgian neurologists
title_sort treatment adherence in multiple sclerosis: a survey of belgian neurologists
topic Original Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4657795/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26640373
http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/PPA.S91973
work_keys_str_mv AT decoodanny treatmentadherenceinmultiplesclerosisasurveyofbelgianneurologists
AT vokaermathieu treatmentadherenceinmultiplesclerosisasurveyofbelgianneurologists