Cargando…

Trade-Offs of Flowering and Maturity Synchronisation for Pineapple Quality

In the pineapple sector of Benin, poor fruit quality prevents pineapple producers to enter the European market. We investigated effects of common cultural practices, flowering and maturity synchronisation, (1) to quantify the trade-offs of flowering and maturity synchronisation for pineapple quality...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Fassinou Hotegni, V. Nicodème, Lommen, Willemien J. M., Agbossou, Euloge K., Struik, Paul C.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Public Library of Science 2015
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4657890/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26599545
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0143290
_version_ 1782402430502174720
author Fassinou Hotegni, V. Nicodème
Lommen, Willemien J. M.
Agbossou, Euloge K.
Struik, Paul C.
author_facet Fassinou Hotegni, V. Nicodème
Lommen, Willemien J. M.
Agbossou, Euloge K.
Struik, Paul C.
author_sort Fassinou Hotegni, V. Nicodème
collection PubMed
description In the pineapple sector of Benin, poor fruit quality prevents pineapple producers to enter the European market. We investigated effects of common cultural practices, flowering and maturity synchronisation, (1) to quantify the trade-offs of flowering and maturity synchronisation for pineapple quality and the proportion of fruits exportable to European markets, and (2) to determine the effect of harvesting practice on quality attributes. Four on-farm experiments were conducted during three years using cultivars Sugarloaf and Smooth Cayenne. A split-split plot design was used in each experiment, with flowering induction practice as main factor (artificial or natural flowering induction), maturity induction practice as split factor (artificial or natural maturity induction) and harvesting practice as the split-split factor (farmers’ harvest practice or individual fruit harvesting at optimum maturity). Artificial flowering induction gave fruits with lower infructescence weight, higher ratio crown: infructescence length, and a lower proportion of fruits exportable to European markets than natural flowering induction. The costs of the improvements by natural flowering induction were huge: the longer durations from planting to flowering induction and harvesting, the higher number of harvestings of the fruits increasing the labour cost and the lower proportion of plants producing fruits compared with crops from artificially flowering-induced plants. Artificial maturity induction decreased the total soluble solids concentration in the fruits compared with natural maturity induction thus decreasing the proportion of fruits exportable to European markets, at a benefit of only a slightly shorter time from flowering induction to harvesting. Harvesting individual fruits at optimum maturity gave fruits with higher total soluble solids in naturally maturity induced fruits compared with the farmers’ harvest practice. Given the huge costs of natural flowering induction, options to use artificial flowering induction effectively for obtaining high fruit quality are discussed.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4657890
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2015
publisher Public Library of Science
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-46578902015-12-02 Trade-Offs of Flowering and Maturity Synchronisation for Pineapple Quality Fassinou Hotegni, V. Nicodème Lommen, Willemien J. M. Agbossou, Euloge K. Struik, Paul C. PLoS One Research Article In the pineapple sector of Benin, poor fruit quality prevents pineapple producers to enter the European market. We investigated effects of common cultural practices, flowering and maturity synchronisation, (1) to quantify the trade-offs of flowering and maturity synchronisation for pineapple quality and the proportion of fruits exportable to European markets, and (2) to determine the effect of harvesting practice on quality attributes. Four on-farm experiments were conducted during three years using cultivars Sugarloaf and Smooth Cayenne. A split-split plot design was used in each experiment, with flowering induction practice as main factor (artificial or natural flowering induction), maturity induction practice as split factor (artificial or natural maturity induction) and harvesting practice as the split-split factor (farmers’ harvest practice or individual fruit harvesting at optimum maturity). Artificial flowering induction gave fruits with lower infructescence weight, higher ratio crown: infructescence length, and a lower proportion of fruits exportable to European markets than natural flowering induction. The costs of the improvements by natural flowering induction were huge: the longer durations from planting to flowering induction and harvesting, the higher number of harvestings of the fruits increasing the labour cost and the lower proportion of plants producing fruits compared with crops from artificially flowering-induced plants. Artificial maturity induction decreased the total soluble solids concentration in the fruits compared with natural maturity induction thus decreasing the proportion of fruits exportable to European markets, at a benefit of only a slightly shorter time from flowering induction to harvesting. Harvesting individual fruits at optimum maturity gave fruits with higher total soluble solids in naturally maturity induced fruits compared with the farmers’ harvest practice. Given the huge costs of natural flowering induction, options to use artificial flowering induction effectively for obtaining high fruit quality are discussed. Public Library of Science 2015-11-23 /pmc/articles/PMC4657890/ /pubmed/26599545 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0143290 Text en © 2015 Fassinou Hotegni et al http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are properly credited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Fassinou Hotegni, V. Nicodème
Lommen, Willemien J. M.
Agbossou, Euloge K.
Struik, Paul C.
Trade-Offs of Flowering and Maturity Synchronisation for Pineapple Quality
title Trade-Offs of Flowering and Maturity Synchronisation for Pineapple Quality
title_full Trade-Offs of Flowering and Maturity Synchronisation for Pineapple Quality
title_fullStr Trade-Offs of Flowering and Maturity Synchronisation for Pineapple Quality
title_full_unstemmed Trade-Offs of Flowering and Maturity Synchronisation for Pineapple Quality
title_short Trade-Offs of Flowering and Maturity Synchronisation for Pineapple Quality
title_sort trade-offs of flowering and maturity synchronisation for pineapple quality
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4657890/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26599545
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0143290
work_keys_str_mv AT fassinouhotegnivnicodeme tradeoffsoffloweringandmaturitysynchronisationforpineapplequality
AT lommenwillemienjm tradeoffsoffloweringandmaturitysynchronisationforpineapplequality
AT agbossoueulogek tradeoffsoffloweringandmaturitysynchronisationforpineapplequality
AT struikpaulc tradeoffsoffloweringandmaturitysynchronisationforpineapplequality