Cargando…
A Risk Assessment of the Jaffe vs Enzymatic Method for Creatinine Measurement in an Outpatient Population
BACKGROUND: The Jaffe and enzymatic methods are the two most common methods for measuring serum creatinine. The Jaffe method is less expensive than the enzymatic method but is also more susceptible to interferences. Interferences can lead to misdiagnosis but interferences may vary by patient populat...
Autores principales: | Schmidt, Robert L., Straseski, Joely A., Raphael, Kalani L., Adams, Austin H., Lehman, Christopher M. |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Public Library of Science
2015
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4657986/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26599086 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0143205 |
Ejemplares similares
-
Comparison of Jaffe Method and Enzymatic Method at Measuring Serum Creatinine Level, Creatinine Clearance and Estimated Glomerular Filtration Rate
por: Osmic–Husni, Alma, et al.
Publicado: (2023) -
LC-MS/MS Method for Serum Creatinine: Comparison with Enzymatic Method and Jaffe Method
por: Ou, Meixian, et al.
Publicado: (2015) -
Comparing Jaffe and Enzymatic Methods for Creatinine Measurement at Various Icterus Levels and Their Impacts on Liver Transplant Allocation
por: Soleimani, Neda, et al.
Publicado: (2023) -
Paired measurement of urinary creatinine in neonates based on a Jaffe and an enzymatic IDMS-traceable assay
por: Allegaert, Karel, et al.
Publicado: (2014) -
Effect of serum creatinine difference between the Jaffe and the enzymatic method on kidney disease detection and staging
por: Boss, Kristina, et al.
Publicado: (2023)