Cargando…

Tegafur Substitution for 5-Fu in Combination with Actinomycin D to Treat Gestational Trophoblastic Neoplasm

Although 5-fluorouracil (5-Fu) combination chemotherapy provides a satisfactory therapeutic response in patients with gestational trophoblastic neoplasms (GTNs), it has severe side effects. The current study analyzed the therapeutic effects and side effects of tegafur plus actinomycin D (Act-D) vs....

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Peng, Mei, Ding, Yiling, Yu, Ling, Deng, Yali, Lai, Weisi, Hu, Yun, Zhang, Hongwen, Wu, Xianqing, Fan, Hong, Ding, Hui, Wu, Yilin, Tao, Guangshi
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Public Library of Science 2015
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4658150/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26599757
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0143531
_version_ 1782402487349673984
author Peng, Mei
Ding, Yiling
Yu, Ling
Deng, Yali
Lai, Weisi
Hu, Yun
Zhang, Hongwen
Wu, Xianqing
Fan, Hong
Ding, Hui
Wu, Yilin
Tao, Guangshi
author_facet Peng, Mei
Ding, Yiling
Yu, Ling
Deng, Yali
Lai, Weisi
Hu, Yun
Zhang, Hongwen
Wu, Xianqing
Fan, Hong
Ding, Hui
Wu, Yilin
Tao, Guangshi
author_sort Peng, Mei
collection PubMed
description Although 5-fluorouracil (5-Fu) combination chemotherapy provides a satisfactory therapeutic response in patients with gestational trophoblastic neoplasms (GTNs), it has severe side effects. The current study analyzed the therapeutic effects and side effects of tegafur plus actinomycin D (Act-D) vs. 5-Fu plus Act-D for the treatment of GTNs based on controlled historical records. A total of 427 GTN cases that received tegafur and Act-D combination chemotherapy at the Second Xiangya Hospital of XiangYa Medical School between August 2003 and July 2013 were analyzed based on historical data. A total of 393 GTN cases that received 5-Fu plus Act-D between August 1993 and July 2003 at the same hospital were also analyzed, which constituted the control group. The therapeutic effects, toxicity and side effects after chemotherapy were compared between the groups. The overall response rate was 90.63% in the tegafur+Act-D group (tegafur group) and 92.37% in the 5-Fu+Act-D group (5-Fu group); these rates were not significantly different (P > 0.05). However, the incidence rates of myelosuppression (white blood cell decline), gastrointestinal reactions (nausea, vomiting, dental ulcer, and diarrhea), skin lesions and phlebitis were lower in the tegafur group than in the 5-Fu group (P < 0.05). The results of this study may provide useful data for the clinical application of tegafur in GTN treatment.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4658150
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2015
publisher Public Library of Science
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-46581502015-12-02 Tegafur Substitution for 5-Fu in Combination with Actinomycin D to Treat Gestational Trophoblastic Neoplasm Peng, Mei Ding, Yiling Yu, Ling Deng, Yali Lai, Weisi Hu, Yun Zhang, Hongwen Wu, Xianqing Fan, Hong Ding, Hui Wu, Yilin Tao, Guangshi PLoS One Research Article Although 5-fluorouracil (5-Fu) combination chemotherapy provides a satisfactory therapeutic response in patients with gestational trophoblastic neoplasms (GTNs), it has severe side effects. The current study analyzed the therapeutic effects and side effects of tegafur plus actinomycin D (Act-D) vs. 5-Fu plus Act-D for the treatment of GTNs based on controlled historical records. A total of 427 GTN cases that received tegafur and Act-D combination chemotherapy at the Second Xiangya Hospital of XiangYa Medical School between August 2003 and July 2013 were analyzed based on historical data. A total of 393 GTN cases that received 5-Fu plus Act-D between August 1993 and July 2003 at the same hospital were also analyzed, which constituted the control group. The therapeutic effects, toxicity and side effects after chemotherapy were compared between the groups. The overall response rate was 90.63% in the tegafur+Act-D group (tegafur group) and 92.37% in the 5-Fu+Act-D group (5-Fu group); these rates were not significantly different (P > 0.05). However, the incidence rates of myelosuppression (white blood cell decline), gastrointestinal reactions (nausea, vomiting, dental ulcer, and diarrhea), skin lesions and phlebitis were lower in the tegafur group than in the 5-Fu group (P < 0.05). The results of this study may provide useful data for the clinical application of tegafur in GTN treatment. Public Library of Science 2015-11-23 /pmc/articles/PMC4658150/ /pubmed/26599757 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0143531 Text en © 2015 Peng et al http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are properly credited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Peng, Mei
Ding, Yiling
Yu, Ling
Deng, Yali
Lai, Weisi
Hu, Yun
Zhang, Hongwen
Wu, Xianqing
Fan, Hong
Ding, Hui
Wu, Yilin
Tao, Guangshi
Tegafur Substitution for 5-Fu in Combination with Actinomycin D to Treat Gestational Trophoblastic Neoplasm
title Tegafur Substitution for 5-Fu in Combination with Actinomycin D to Treat Gestational Trophoblastic Neoplasm
title_full Tegafur Substitution for 5-Fu in Combination with Actinomycin D to Treat Gestational Trophoblastic Neoplasm
title_fullStr Tegafur Substitution for 5-Fu in Combination with Actinomycin D to Treat Gestational Trophoblastic Neoplasm
title_full_unstemmed Tegafur Substitution for 5-Fu in Combination with Actinomycin D to Treat Gestational Trophoblastic Neoplasm
title_short Tegafur Substitution for 5-Fu in Combination with Actinomycin D to Treat Gestational Trophoblastic Neoplasm
title_sort tegafur substitution for 5-fu in combination with actinomycin d to treat gestational trophoblastic neoplasm
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4658150/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26599757
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0143531
work_keys_str_mv AT pengmei tegafursubstitutionfor5fuincombinationwithactinomycindtotreatgestationaltrophoblasticneoplasm
AT dingyiling tegafursubstitutionfor5fuincombinationwithactinomycindtotreatgestationaltrophoblasticneoplasm
AT yuling tegafursubstitutionfor5fuincombinationwithactinomycindtotreatgestationaltrophoblasticneoplasm
AT dengyali tegafursubstitutionfor5fuincombinationwithactinomycindtotreatgestationaltrophoblasticneoplasm
AT laiweisi tegafursubstitutionfor5fuincombinationwithactinomycindtotreatgestationaltrophoblasticneoplasm
AT huyun tegafursubstitutionfor5fuincombinationwithactinomycindtotreatgestationaltrophoblasticneoplasm
AT zhanghongwen tegafursubstitutionfor5fuincombinationwithactinomycindtotreatgestationaltrophoblasticneoplasm
AT wuxianqing tegafursubstitutionfor5fuincombinationwithactinomycindtotreatgestationaltrophoblasticneoplasm
AT fanhong tegafursubstitutionfor5fuincombinationwithactinomycindtotreatgestationaltrophoblasticneoplasm
AT dinghui tegafursubstitutionfor5fuincombinationwithactinomycindtotreatgestationaltrophoblasticneoplasm
AT wuyilin tegafursubstitutionfor5fuincombinationwithactinomycindtotreatgestationaltrophoblasticneoplasm
AT taoguangshi tegafursubstitutionfor5fuincombinationwithactinomycindtotreatgestationaltrophoblasticneoplasm