Cargando…
The Practicability of a Novel Prognostic Index (PI) Model and Comparison with Nottingham Prognostic Index (NPI) in Stage I–III Breast Cancer Patients Undergoing Surgical Treatment
BACKGROUND: Previous studies have indicated the prognostic value of various laboratory parameters in cancer patients. This study was to establish a prognostic index (PI) model for breast cancer patients based on the potential prognostic factors. METHODS: A retrospective study of 1661 breast cancer p...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Public Library of Science
2015
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4658156/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26600129 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0143537 |
_version_ | 1782402488694996992 |
---|---|
author | Wen, Jiahuai Ye, Feng Li, Shuaijie Huang, Xiaojia Yang, Lu Xiao, Xiangsheng Xie, Xiaoming |
author_facet | Wen, Jiahuai Ye, Feng Li, Shuaijie Huang, Xiaojia Yang, Lu Xiao, Xiangsheng Xie, Xiaoming |
author_sort | Wen, Jiahuai |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Previous studies have indicated the prognostic value of various laboratory parameters in cancer patients. This study was to establish a prognostic index (PI) model for breast cancer patients based on the potential prognostic factors. METHODS: A retrospective study of 1661 breast cancer patients who underwent surgical treatment between January 2002 and December 2008 at Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center was conducted. Multivariate analysis (Cox regression model) was performed to determine the independent prognostic factors and a prognostic index (PI) model was devised based on these factors. Survival analyses were used to estimate the prognostic value of PI, and the discriminatory ability of PI was compared with Nottingham Prognostic Index (NPI) by evaluating the area under the receiver operating characteristics curves (AUC). RESULTS: The mean survival time of all participants was 123.6 months. The preoperative globulin >30.0g/L, triglyceride >1.10mmol/L and fibrinogen >2.83g/L were identified as risk factors for shorter cancer-specific survival. The novel prognostic index model was established and enrolled patients were classified as low- (1168 patients, 70.3%), moderate- (410 patients, 24.7%) and high-risk groups (83 patients, 5.0%), respectively. Compared with the low-risk group, higher risks of poor clinical outcome were indicated in the moderate-risk group [Hazard ratio (HR): 1.513, 95% confidence interval (CI): 1.169–1.959, p = 0.002] and high-risk group (HR: 2.481, 95%CI: 1.653–3.724, p< 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: The prognostic index based on three laboratory parameters was a novel and practicable prognostic tool. It may serve as complement to help predict postoperative survival in breast cancer patients. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-4658156 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2015 |
publisher | Public Library of Science |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-46581562015-12-02 The Practicability of a Novel Prognostic Index (PI) Model and Comparison with Nottingham Prognostic Index (NPI) in Stage I–III Breast Cancer Patients Undergoing Surgical Treatment Wen, Jiahuai Ye, Feng Li, Shuaijie Huang, Xiaojia Yang, Lu Xiao, Xiangsheng Xie, Xiaoming PLoS One Research Article BACKGROUND: Previous studies have indicated the prognostic value of various laboratory parameters in cancer patients. This study was to establish a prognostic index (PI) model for breast cancer patients based on the potential prognostic factors. METHODS: A retrospective study of 1661 breast cancer patients who underwent surgical treatment between January 2002 and December 2008 at Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center was conducted. Multivariate analysis (Cox regression model) was performed to determine the independent prognostic factors and a prognostic index (PI) model was devised based on these factors. Survival analyses were used to estimate the prognostic value of PI, and the discriminatory ability of PI was compared with Nottingham Prognostic Index (NPI) by evaluating the area under the receiver operating characteristics curves (AUC). RESULTS: The mean survival time of all participants was 123.6 months. The preoperative globulin >30.0g/L, triglyceride >1.10mmol/L and fibrinogen >2.83g/L were identified as risk factors for shorter cancer-specific survival. The novel prognostic index model was established and enrolled patients were classified as low- (1168 patients, 70.3%), moderate- (410 patients, 24.7%) and high-risk groups (83 patients, 5.0%), respectively. Compared with the low-risk group, higher risks of poor clinical outcome were indicated in the moderate-risk group [Hazard ratio (HR): 1.513, 95% confidence interval (CI): 1.169–1.959, p = 0.002] and high-risk group (HR: 2.481, 95%CI: 1.653–3.724, p< 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: The prognostic index based on three laboratory parameters was a novel and practicable prognostic tool. It may serve as complement to help predict postoperative survival in breast cancer patients. Public Library of Science 2015-11-23 /pmc/articles/PMC4658156/ /pubmed/26600129 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0143537 Text en © 2015 Wen et al http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are properly credited. |
spellingShingle | Research Article Wen, Jiahuai Ye, Feng Li, Shuaijie Huang, Xiaojia Yang, Lu Xiao, Xiangsheng Xie, Xiaoming The Practicability of a Novel Prognostic Index (PI) Model and Comparison with Nottingham Prognostic Index (NPI) in Stage I–III Breast Cancer Patients Undergoing Surgical Treatment |
title | The Practicability of a Novel Prognostic Index (PI) Model and Comparison with Nottingham Prognostic Index (NPI) in Stage I–III Breast Cancer Patients Undergoing Surgical Treatment |
title_full | The Practicability of a Novel Prognostic Index (PI) Model and Comparison with Nottingham Prognostic Index (NPI) in Stage I–III Breast Cancer Patients Undergoing Surgical Treatment |
title_fullStr | The Practicability of a Novel Prognostic Index (PI) Model and Comparison with Nottingham Prognostic Index (NPI) in Stage I–III Breast Cancer Patients Undergoing Surgical Treatment |
title_full_unstemmed | The Practicability of a Novel Prognostic Index (PI) Model and Comparison with Nottingham Prognostic Index (NPI) in Stage I–III Breast Cancer Patients Undergoing Surgical Treatment |
title_short | The Practicability of a Novel Prognostic Index (PI) Model and Comparison with Nottingham Prognostic Index (NPI) in Stage I–III Breast Cancer Patients Undergoing Surgical Treatment |
title_sort | practicability of a novel prognostic index (pi) model and comparison with nottingham prognostic index (npi) in stage i–iii breast cancer patients undergoing surgical treatment |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4658156/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26600129 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0143537 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT wenjiahuai thepracticabilityofanovelprognosticindexpimodelandcomparisonwithnottinghamprognosticindexnpiinstageiiiibreastcancerpatientsundergoingsurgicaltreatment AT yefeng thepracticabilityofanovelprognosticindexpimodelandcomparisonwithnottinghamprognosticindexnpiinstageiiiibreastcancerpatientsundergoingsurgicaltreatment AT lishuaijie thepracticabilityofanovelprognosticindexpimodelandcomparisonwithnottinghamprognosticindexnpiinstageiiiibreastcancerpatientsundergoingsurgicaltreatment AT huangxiaojia thepracticabilityofanovelprognosticindexpimodelandcomparisonwithnottinghamprognosticindexnpiinstageiiiibreastcancerpatientsundergoingsurgicaltreatment AT yanglu thepracticabilityofanovelprognosticindexpimodelandcomparisonwithnottinghamprognosticindexnpiinstageiiiibreastcancerpatientsundergoingsurgicaltreatment AT xiaoxiangsheng thepracticabilityofanovelprognosticindexpimodelandcomparisonwithnottinghamprognosticindexnpiinstageiiiibreastcancerpatientsundergoingsurgicaltreatment AT xiexiaoming thepracticabilityofanovelprognosticindexpimodelandcomparisonwithnottinghamprognosticindexnpiinstageiiiibreastcancerpatientsundergoingsurgicaltreatment AT wenjiahuai practicabilityofanovelprognosticindexpimodelandcomparisonwithnottinghamprognosticindexnpiinstageiiiibreastcancerpatientsundergoingsurgicaltreatment AT yefeng practicabilityofanovelprognosticindexpimodelandcomparisonwithnottinghamprognosticindexnpiinstageiiiibreastcancerpatientsundergoingsurgicaltreatment AT lishuaijie practicabilityofanovelprognosticindexpimodelandcomparisonwithnottinghamprognosticindexnpiinstageiiiibreastcancerpatientsundergoingsurgicaltreatment AT huangxiaojia practicabilityofanovelprognosticindexpimodelandcomparisonwithnottinghamprognosticindexnpiinstageiiiibreastcancerpatientsundergoingsurgicaltreatment AT yanglu practicabilityofanovelprognosticindexpimodelandcomparisonwithnottinghamprognosticindexnpiinstageiiiibreastcancerpatientsundergoingsurgicaltreatment AT xiaoxiangsheng practicabilityofanovelprognosticindexpimodelandcomparisonwithnottinghamprognosticindexnpiinstageiiiibreastcancerpatientsundergoingsurgicaltreatment AT xiexiaoming practicabilityofanovelprognosticindexpimodelandcomparisonwithnottinghamprognosticindexnpiinstageiiiibreastcancerpatientsundergoingsurgicaltreatment |