Cargando…

The Practicability of a Novel Prognostic Index (PI) Model and Comparison with Nottingham Prognostic Index (NPI) in Stage I–III Breast Cancer Patients Undergoing Surgical Treatment

BACKGROUND: Previous studies have indicated the prognostic value of various laboratory parameters in cancer patients. This study was to establish a prognostic index (PI) model for breast cancer patients based on the potential prognostic factors. METHODS: A retrospective study of 1661 breast cancer p...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Wen, Jiahuai, Ye, Feng, Li, Shuaijie, Huang, Xiaojia, Yang, Lu, Xiao, Xiangsheng, Xie, Xiaoming
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Public Library of Science 2015
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4658156/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26600129
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0143537
_version_ 1782402488694996992
author Wen, Jiahuai
Ye, Feng
Li, Shuaijie
Huang, Xiaojia
Yang, Lu
Xiao, Xiangsheng
Xie, Xiaoming
author_facet Wen, Jiahuai
Ye, Feng
Li, Shuaijie
Huang, Xiaojia
Yang, Lu
Xiao, Xiangsheng
Xie, Xiaoming
author_sort Wen, Jiahuai
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Previous studies have indicated the prognostic value of various laboratory parameters in cancer patients. This study was to establish a prognostic index (PI) model for breast cancer patients based on the potential prognostic factors. METHODS: A retrospective study of 1661 breast cancer patients who underwent surgical treatment between January 2002 and December 2008 at Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center was conducted. Multivariate analysis (Cox regression model) was performed to determine the independent prognostic factors and a prognostic index (PI) model was devised based on these factors. Survival analyses were used to estimate the prognostic value of PI, and the discriminatory ability of PI was compared with Nottingham Prognostic Index (NPI) by evaluating the area under the receiver operating characteristics curves (AUC). RESULTS: The mean survival time of all participants was 123.6 months. The preoperative globulin >30.0g/L, triglyceride >1.10mmol/L and fibrinogen >2.83g/L were identified as risk factors for shorter cancer-specific survival. The novel prognostic index model was established and enrolled patients were classified as low- (1168 patients, 70.3%), moderate- (410 patients, 24.7%) and high-risk groups (83 patients, 5.0%), respectively. Compared with the low-risk group, higher risks of poor clinical outcome were indicated in the moderate-risk group [Hazard ratio (HR): 1.513, 95% confidence interval (CI): 1.169–1.959, p = 0.002] and high-risk group (HR: 2.481, 95%CI: 1.653–3.724, p< 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: The prognostic index based on three laboratory parameters was a novel and practicable prognostic tool. It may serve as complement to help predict postoperative survival in breast cancer patients.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4658156
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2015
publisher Public Library of Science
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-46581562015-12-02 The Practicability of a Novel Prognostic Index (PI) Model and Comparison with Nottingham Prognostic Index (NPI) in Stage I–III Breast Cancer Patients Undergoing Surgical Treatment Wen, Jiahuai Ye, Feng Li, Shuaijie Huang, Xiaojia Yang, Lu Xiao, Xiangsheng Xie, Xiaoming PLoS One Research Article BACKGROUND: Previous studies have indicated the prognostic value of various laboratory parameters in cancer patients. This study was to establish a prognostic index (PI) model for breast cancer patients based on the potential prognostic factors. METHODS: A retrospective study of 1661 breast cancer patients who underwent surgical treatment between January 2002 and December 2008 at Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center was conducted. Multivariate analysis (Cox regression model) was performed to determine the independent prognostic factors and a prognostic index (PI) model was devised based on these factors. Survival analyses were used to estimate the prognostic value of PI, and the discriminatory ability of PI was compared with Nottingham Prognostic Index (NPI) by evaluating the area under the receiver operating characteristics curves (AUC). RESULTS: The mean survival time of all participants was 123.6 months. The preoperative globulin >30.0g/L, triglyceride >1.10mmol/L and fibrinogen >2.83g/L were identified as risk factors for shorter cancer-specific survival. The novel prognostic index model was established and enrolled patients were classified as low- (1168 patients, 70.3%), moderate- (410 patients, 24.7%) and high-risk groups (83 patients, 5.0%), respectively. Compared with the low-risk group, higher risks of poor clinical outcome were indicated in the moderate-risk group [Hazard ratio (HR): 1.513, 95% confidence interval (CI): 1.169–1.959, p = 0.002] and high-risk group (HR: 2.481, 95%CI: 1.653–3.724, p< 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: The prognostic index based on three laboratory parameters was a novel and practicable prognostic tool. It may serve as complement to help predict postoperative survival in breast cancer patients. Public Library of Science 2015-11-23 /pmc/articles/PMC4658156/ /pubmed/26600129 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0143537 Text en © 2015 Wen et al http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are properly credited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Wen, Jiahuai
Ye, Feng
Li, Shuaijie
Huang, Xiaojia
Yang, Lu
Xiao, Xiangsheng
Xie, Xiaoming
The Practicability of a Novel Prognostic Index (PI) Model and Comparison with Nottingham Prognostic Index (NPI) in Stage I–III Breast Cancer Patients Undergoing Surgical Treatment
title The Practicability of a Novel Prognostic Index (PI) Model and Comparison with Nottingham Prognostic Index (NPI) in Stage I–III Breast Cancer Patients Undergoing Surgical Treatment
title_full The Practicability of a Novel Prognostic Index (PI) Model and Comparison with Nottingham Prognostic Index (NPI) in Stage I–III Breast Cancer Patients Undergoing Surgical Treatment
title_fullStr The Practicability of a Novel Prognostic Index (PI) Model and Comparison with Nottingham Prognostic Index (NPI) in Stage I–III Breast Cancer Patients Undergoing Surgical Treatment
title_full_unstemmed The Practicability of a Novel Prognostic Index (PI) Model and Comparison with Nottingham Prognostic Index (NPI) in Stage I–III Breast Cancer Patients Undergoing Surgical Treatment
title_short The Practicability of a Novel Prognostic Index (PI) Model and Comparison with Nottingham Prognostic Index (NPI) in Stage I–III Breast Cancer Patients Undergoing Surgical Treatment
title_sort practicability of a novel prognostic index (pi) model and comparison with nottingham prognostic index (npi) in stage i–iii breast cancer patients undergoing surgical treatment
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4658156/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26600129
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0143537
work_keys_str_mv AT wenjiahuai thepracticabilityofanovelprognosticindexpimodelandcomparisonwithnottinghamprognosticindexnpiinstageiiiibreastcancerpatientsundergoingsurgicaltreatment
AT yefeng thepracticabilityofanovelprognosticindexpimodelandcomparisonwithnottinghamprognosticindexnpiinstageiiiibreastcancerpatientsundergoingsurgicaltreatment
AT lishuaijie thepracticabilityofanovelprognosticindexpimodelandcomparisonwithnottinghamprognosticindexnpiinstageiiiibreastcancerpatientsundergoingsurgicaltreatment
AT huangxiaojia thepracticabilityofanovelprognosticindexpimodelandcomparisonwithnottinghamprognosticindexnpiinstageiiiibreastcancerpatientsundergoingsurgicaltreatment
AT yanglu thepracticabilityofanovelprognosticindexpimodelandcomparisonwithnottinghamprognosticindexnpiinstageiiiibreastcancerpatientsundergoingsurgicaltreatment
AT xiaoxiangsheng thepracticabilityofanovelprognosticindexpimodelandcomparisonwithnottinghamprognosticindexnpiinstageiiiibreastcancerpatientsundergoingsurgicaltreatment
AT xiexiaoming thepracticabilityofanovelprognosticindexpimodelandcomparisonwithnottinghamprognosticindexnpiinstageiiiibreastcancerpatientsundergoingsurgicaltreatment
AT wenjiahuai practicabilityofanovelprognosticindexpimodelandcomparisonwithnottinghamprognosticindexnpiinstageiiiibreastcancerpatientsundergoingsurgicaltreatment
AT yefeng practicabilityofanovelprognosticindexpimodelandcomparisonwithnottinghamprognosticindexnpiinstageiiiibreastcancerpatientsundergoingsurgicaltreatment
AT lishuaijie practicabilityofanovelprognosticindexpimodelandcomparisonwithnottinghamprognosticindexnpiinstageiiiibreastcancerpatientsundergoingsurgicaltreatment
AT huangxiaojia practicabilityofanovelprognosticindexpimodelandcomparisonwithnottinghamprognosticindexnpiinstageiiiibreastcancerpatientsundergoingsurgicaltreatment
AT yanglu practicabilityofanovelprognosticindexpimodelandcomparisonwithnottinghamprognosticindexnpiinstageiiiibreastcancerpatientsundergoingsurgicaltreatment
AT xiaoxiangsheng practicabilityofanovelprognosticindexpimodelandcomparisonwithnottinghamprognosticindexnpiinstageiiiibreastcancerpatientsundergoingsurgicaltreatment
AT xiexiaoming practicabilityofanovelprognosticindexpimodelandcomparisonwithnottinghamprognosticindexnpiinstageiiiibreastcancerpatientsundergoingsurgicaltreatment