Cargando…
Commentary: Extensional Versus Intuitive Reasoning: The Conjunction Fallacy in Probability Judgment
Autor principal: | Lewinski, Peter |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Frontiers Media S.A.
2015
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4658440/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26635712 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2015.01832 |
Ejemplares similares
-
Is experiential-intuitive cognitive style more inclined to err on conjunction fallacy than analytical-rational cognitive style?
por: Lu, Yong
Publicado: (2015) -
Is There a Conjunction Fallacy in Legal Probabilistic Decision Making?
por: Wojciechowski, Bartosz W., et al.
Publicado: (2018) -
Why the Conjunction Effect Is Rarely a Fallacy: How Learning Influences Uncertainty and the Conjunction Rule
por: Maguire, Phil, et al.
Publicado: (2018) -
Corrigendum: Is There a Conjunction Fallacy in Legal Probabilistic Decision Making?
por: Wojciechowski, Bartosz W., et al.
Publicado: (2018) -
Commentary: Fairness is intuitive
por: Myrseth, Kristian O. R., et al.
Publicado: (2016)