Cargando…

What is the effect of patient-reported outcome (PRO) item order on prioritisation of PROs in the development of a core outcome set?

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales:	Chalmers, Katy, Avery, Kerry, Coulman, Karen, Blencowe, Natalie, Macefield, Rhiannon, Metcalfe, Chris, Blazeby, Jane, Brookes, Sara
Formato:	Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:	English
Publicado:	BioMed Central 2015
Materias:	Oral Presentation
Acceso en línea:	https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4658780/ http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1745-6215-16-S2-O73

Ejemplares similares

Impact of question order on prioritisation of outcomes in the development of a core outcome set: a randomised controlled trial
por: Brookes, Sara T., et al.
Publicado: (2018)

The importance of stakeholder selection in core outcome set development: how surveying different health professionals may influence outcome selection
por: Avery, Kerry, et al.
Publicado: (2015)

Core outcome set development: the effect of Delphi panel composition and feedback on prioritisation of outcomes
por: Macefield, Rhiannon, et al.
Publicado: (2013)

Choosing outcomes for a core outcome set: does provision of feedback between delphi survey rounds help prioritise items?
por: Coulman, Karen, et al.
Publicado: (2015)

Development of a Core Outcome Set for Clinical Effectiveness Trials in Esophageal Cancer Resection Surgery
por: Avery, Kerry N. L., et al.
Publicado: (2018)

Incorporating patient reported outcomes (PROs) in gastro-intestinal (GI) cancer randomised controlled trials (RCTs): the need for adequate rationale and integrated reporting
por: Macefield, Rhiannon C, et al.
Publicado: (2011)

Developing core outcomes sets: methods for identifying and including patient-reported outcomes (PROs)
por: Macefield, Rhiannon C, et al.
Publicado: (2014)

Development of a ‘universal-reporter’ outcome measure (UROM) for patient and healthcare professional completion: a mixed methods study demonstrating a novel concept for optimal questionnaire design
por: Macefield, Rhiannon, et al.
Publicado: (2019)

‘Trial Exegesis’: Methods for Synthesizing Clinical and Patient Reported Outcome (PRO) Data in Trials to Inform Clinical Practice. A Systematic Review
por: McNair, Angus G. K., et al.
Publicado: (2016)

The case for a HRQL core outcome set: outcome reporting bias in oesophageal cancer studies
por: Macefield, Rhiannon C, et al.
Publicado: (2011)

Core outcomes for randomized trials and core information for clinical decision-making: implications for outcome selection
por: McNair, Angus, et al.
Publicado: (2015)

Three nested RCTs of dual or single stakeholder feedback within Delphi surveys during core outcome and information set development
por: Brookes, Sara, et al.
Publicado: (2015)

Methods for selecting health concepts and domains from in-depth qualitative interviews for the development of patient reported outcome measures (PROMS): a case study
por: Blazeby, Jane, et al.
Publicado: (2015)

Development of a single, practical measure of surgical site infection (SSI) for patient self-report and observer completion: a novel method of questionnaire design
por: Macefield, Rhiannon, et al.
Publicado: (2015)

Development of reporting guidance and core outcome sets for seamless, standardised evaluation of innovative surgical procedures and devices: a study protocol for content generation and a Delphi consensus process (COHESIVE study)
por: Avery, Kerry, et al.
Publicado: (2019)

A Systematic Review of Patient-reported Outcomes in Randomized Controlled Trials of Unplanned General Surgery
por: Stevens, Daniel J., et al.
Publicado: (2015)

Three nested randomized controlled trials of peer-only or multiple stakeholder group feedback within Delphi surveys during core outcome and information set development
por: Brookes, Sara T., et al.
Publicado: (2016)

A Core Outcome Set for Seamless, Standardized Evaluation of Innovative Surgical Procedures and Devices (COHESIVE): A Patient and Professional Stakeholder Consensus Study
por: Avery, Kerry N.L., et al.
Publicado: (2023)

Identification of outcomes to inform the development of a core outcome set for surgical innovation: a targeted review of case studies of novel surgical devices
por: Wilson, Nicholas, et al.
Publicado: (2022)

Development of a Bariatric Surgery Core Data Set for an International Registry
por: Coulman, Karen D., et al.
Publicado: (2023)

Selecting and measuring optimal outcomes for randomised controlled trials in surgery
por: Macefield, Rhiannon C., et al.
Publicado: (2013)

Shared Learning Utilizing Digital Methods in Surgery to Enhance Transparency in Surgical Innovation: Protocol for a Scoping Review
por: Hoffmann, Christin, et al.
Publicado: (2022)

Optimising the design and evaluation of pilot work to inform the main trial: a review of current evidence and consideration of future practices
por: O'Connell Francischetto, Elaine, et al.
Publicado: (2013)

The COMET (Core Outcome Measures in Effectiveness Trials) Initiative
por: Williamson, Paula R, et al.
Publicado: (2011)

Pro’s and con’s of the stepped wedge design in cluster randomised trials of quality improvement interventions: two current examples
por: Dreischulte, Tobias, et al.
Publicado: (2013)

Reporting Modifications in Surgical Innovation: A Systematic Scoping Review Protocol
por: Hoffmann, Christin, et al.
Publicado: (2021)

Development of a conceptual framework for reporting modifications in surgical innovation: scoping review
por: Hossaini, Sina, et al.
Publicado: (2023)

A Core Outcome Set for the Benefits and Adverse Events of Bariatric and Metabolic Surgery: The BARIACT Project
por: Coulman, Karen D., et al.
Publicado: (2016)

Methods for standardising and monitoring surgical interventions in RCTs
por: Blencowe, Natalie, et al.
Publicado: (2015)

Methods for evaluating innovative surgery: a nested ideal phase 2 study within an external randomised pilot (the ROMIO trial)
por: Blazeby, Jane, et al.
Publicado: (2015)

Core Outcomes for Colorectal Cancer Surgery: A Consensus Study
por: McNair, Angus G. K., et al.
Publicado: (2016)

Remote assessment of surgical site infection (SSI) using patient-taken wound images: Development and evaluation of a method for research and routine practice
por: Macefield, Rhiannon C., et al.
Publicado: (2023)

Prioritisation of specialist health care services: going beyond the evidence
por: Webb, Philip, et al.
Publicado: (2014)

Patient-Reported Outcome Measures for Post-mastectomy Breast Reconstruction: A Systematic Review of Development and Measurement Properties
por: Davies, C. F., et al.
Publicado: (2020)

How are trial outcomes prioritised by stakeholders from different regions? Analysis of an international Delphi survey to develop a core outcome set in gastric cancer surgery
por: Alkhaffaf, Bilal, et al.
Publicado: (2021)

Core Outcome Set-STAndardised Protocol Items: the COS-STAP Statement
por: Kirkham, Jamie J., et al.
Publicado: (2019)

A Comparison of Health Professionals’ and Patients’ Views of the Importance of Outcomes of Bariatric Surgery
por: Coulman, Karen D., et al.
Publicado: (2016)

Development of a single, practical measure of surgical site infection (SSI) for patient report or observer completion
por: Macefield, Rhiannon C, et al.
Publicado: (2017)

Outcome selection, measurement and reporting for new surgical procedures and devices: a systematic review of IDEAL/IDEAL‐D studies to inform development of a core outcome set
por: Macefield, R. C., et al.
Publicado: (2020)

Development of a core outcome set for research and audit studies in reconstructive breast surgery
por: Potter, S., et al.
Publicado: (2015)

Cannot write session to /tmp/vufind_sessions/sess_14qh24uj4vmvpa7ecao8ajvl31