Cargando…

The importance of stakeholder selection in core outcome set development: how surveying different health professionals may influence outcome selection

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales:	Avery, Kerry, Chalmers, Katy, Whale, Katie, Blencowe, Natalie, Macefield, Rhiannon, Brookes, Sara, Metcalfe, Chris, Blazeby, Jane
Formato:	Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:	English
Publicado:	BioMed Central 2015
Materias:	Poster Presentation
Acceso en línea:	https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4659317/ http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1745-6215-16-S2-P47

Ejemplares similares

What is the effect of patient-reported outcome (PRO) item order on prioritisation of PROs in the development of a core outcome set?
por: Chalmers, Katy, et al.
Publicado: (2015)

Development of a Core Outcome Set for Clinical Effectiveness Trials in Esophageal Cancer Resection Surgery
por: Avery, Kerry N. L., et al.
Publicado: (2018)

Three nested RCTs of dual or single stakeholder feedback within Delphi surveys during core outcome and information set development
por: Brookes, Sara, et al.
Publicado: (2015)

Core outcomes for randomized trials and core information for clinical decision-making: implications for outcome selection
por: McNair, Angus, et al.
Publicado: (2015)

Core outcome set development: the effect of Delphi panel composition and feedback on prioritisation of outcomes
por: Macefield, Rhiannon, et al.
Publicado: (2013)

Development of a ‘universal-reporter’ outcome measure (UROM) for patient and healthcare professional completion: a mixed methods study demonstrating a novel concept for optimal questionnaire design
por: Macefield, Rhiannon, et al.
Publicado: (2019)

A Core Outcome Set for Seamless, Standardized Evaluation of Innovative Surgical Procedures and Devices (COHESIVE): A Patient and Professional Stakeholder Consensus Study
por: Avery, Kerry N.L., et al.
Publicado: (2023)

Three nested randomized controlled trials of peer-only or multiple stakeholder group feedback within Delphi surveys during core outcome and information set development
por: Brookes, Sara T., et al.
Publicado: (2016)

The case for a HRQL core outcome set: outcome reporting bias in oesophageal cancer studies
por: Macefield, Rhiannon C, et al.
Publicado: (2011)

Impact of question order on prioritisation of outcomes in the development of a core outcome set: a randomised controlled trial
por: Brookes, Sara T., et al.
Publicado: (2018)

Choosing outcomes for a core outcome set: does provision of feedback between delphi survey rounds help prioritise items?
por: Coulman, Karen, et al.
Publicado: (2015)

Incorporating patient reported outcomes (PROs) in gastro-intestinal (GI) cancer randomised controlled trials (RCTs): the need for adequate rationale and integrated reporting
por: Macefield, Rhiannon C, et al.
Publicado: (2011)

‘Trial Exegesis’: Methods for Synthesizing Clinical and Patient Reported Outcome (PRO) Data in Trials to Inform Clinical Practice. A Systematic Review
por: McNair, Angus G. K., et al.
Publicado: (2016)

Development of reporting guidance and core outcome sets for seamless, standardised evaluation of innovative surgical procedures and devices: a study protocol for content generation and a Delphi consensus process (COHESIVE study)
por: Avery, Kerry, et al.
Publicado: (2019)

Selecting and measuring optimal outcomes for randomised controlled trials in surgery
por: Macefield, Rhiannon C., et al.
Publicado: (2013)

A Systematic Review of Patient-reported Outcomes in Randomized Controlled Trials of Unplanned General Surgery
por: Stevens, Daniel J., et al.
Publicado: (2015)

Exploring methods the for selection and integration of stakeholder views in the development of core outcome sets: a case study in reconstructive breast surgery
por: Potter, Shelley, et al.
Publicado: (2016)

Identification of outcomes to inform the development of a core outcome set for surgical innovation: a targeted review of case studies of novel surgical devices
por: Wilson, Nicholas, et al.
Publicado: (2022)

Developing core outcomes sets: methods for identifying and including patient-reported outcomes (PROs)
por: Macefield, Rhiannon C, et al.
Publicado: (2014)

Methods for selecting health concepts and domains from in-depth qualitative interviews for the development of patient reported outcome measures (PROMS): a case study
por: Blazeby, Jane, et al.
Publicado: (2015)

Outcome selection, measurement and reporting for new surgical procedures and devices: a systematic review of IDEAL/IDEAL‐D studies to inform development of a core outcome set
por: Macefield, R. C., et al.
Publicado: (2020)

A Comparison of Health Professionals’ and Patients’ Views of the Importance of Outcomes of Bariatric Surgery
por: Coulman, Karen D., et al.
Publicado: (2016)

Shared Learning Utilizing Digital Methods in Surgery to Enhance Transparency in Surgical Innovation: Protocol for a Scoping Review
por: Hoffmann, Christin, et al.
Publicado: (2022)

Reporting Modifications in Surgical Innovation: A Systematic Scoping Review Protocol
por: Hoffmann, Christin, et al.
Publicado: (2021)

Development of a conceptual framework for reporting modifications in surgical innovation: scoping review
por: Hossaini, Sina, et al.
Publicado: (2023)

Core Outcomes for Colorectal Cancer Surgery: A Consensus Study
por: McNair, Angus G. K., et al.
Publicado: (2016)

Development of a core outcome set for research and audit studies in reconstructive breast surgery
por: Potter, S., et al.
Publicado: (2015)

Development of a single, practical measure of surgical site infection (SSI) for patient report or observer completion
por: Macefield, Rhiannon C, et al.
Publicado: (2017)

Development of a single, practical measure of surgical site infection (SSI) for patient self-report and observer completion: a novel method of questionnaire design
por: Macefield, Rhiannon, et al.
Publicado: (2015)

Trial outcomes and information for clinical decision-making: a comparative study of opinions of health professionals
por: McNair, Angus G. K., et al.
Publicado: (2016)

The development of a colorectal cancer surgery core outcome set
por: McNair, AGK, et al.
Publicado: (2015)

Remote assessment of surgical site infection (SSI) using patient-taken wound images: Development and evaluation of a method for research and routine practice
por: Macefield, Rhiannon C., et al.
Publicado: (2023)

Development of a Bariatric Surgery Core Data Set for an International Registry
por: Coulman, Karen D., et al.
Publicado: (2023)

Patient-Reported Outcome Measures for Post-mastectomy Breast Reconstruction: A Systematic Review of Development and Measurement Properties
por: Davies, C. F., et al.
Publicado: (2020)

A systematic scoping review protocol to summarise and appraise the use of artificial intelligence in the analysis of digital videos of invasive general surgical procedures
por: King, Anni, et al.
Publicado: (2023)

Investigating the collection and assessment of patient-reported outcome data amongst unplanned surgical hospital admissions: a feasibility study
por: Mason, John D, et al.
Publicado: (2015)

Agreement on what to measure in randomised controlled trials in burn care: study protocol for the development of a core outcome set
por: Young, Amber, et al.
Publicado: (2017)

Uptake of core outcome sets by clinical trialists publishing in major medical journals: Protocol
por: Matvienko-Sikar, Karen, et al.
Publicado: (2021)

A Core Outcome Set for the Benefits and Adverse Events of Bariatric and Metabolic Surgery: The BARIACT Project
por: Coulman, Karen D., et al.
Publicado: (2016)

How do pilot and feasibility studies inform randomised placebo-controlled trials in surgery? A systematic review
por: Cousins, Sian, et al.
Publicado: (2023)

Cannot write session to /tmp/vufind_sessions/sess_dks1tti6f6oef3a11rj145de4f