Cargando…
Comparison of Multiparametric MRI Scoring Systems and the Impact on Cancer Detection in Patients Undergoing MR US Fusion Guided Prostate Biopsies
INTRODUCTION: Multiple scoring systems have been proposed for prostate MRI reporting. We sought to review the clinical impact of the new Prostate Imaging Reporting and Data System v2 (PI-RADS) and compare those results to our proposed Simplified Qualitative System (SQS) score with respect to detecti...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Public Library of Science
2015
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4659614/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26605548 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0143404 |
_version_ | 1782402652671311872 |
---|---|
author | Rastinehad, Ardeshir R. Waingankar, Nikhil Turkbey, Baris Yaskiv, Oksana Sonstegard, Anna M. Fakhoury, Mathew Olsson, Carl A. Siegel, David N. Choyke, Peter L. Ben-Levi, Eran Villani, Robert |
author_facet | Rastinehad, Ardeshir R. Waingankar, Nikhil Turkbey, Baris Yaskiv, Oksana Sonstegard, Anna M. Fakhoury, Mathew Olsson, Carl A. Siegel, David N. Choyke, Peter L. Ben-Levi, Eran Villani, Robert |
author_sort | Rastinehad, Ardeshir R. |
collection | PubMed |
description | INTRODUCTION: Multiple scoring systems have been proposed for prostate MRI reporting. We sought to review the clinical impact of the new Prostate Imaging Reporting and Data System v2 (PI-RADS) and compare those results to our proposed Simplified Qualitative System (SQS) score with respect to detection of prostate cancers and clinically significant prostate cancers. METHODS: All patients who underwent multiparametric prostate MRI (mpMRI) had their images interpreted using PI-RADS v1 and SQS score. PI-RADS v2 was calculated from prospectively collected data points. Patients with positive mpMRIs were then referred by their urologists for enrollment in an IRB-approved prospective phase III trial of mpMRI-Ultrasound (MR/TRUS) fusion biopsy of suspicious lesions. Standard 12-core biopsy was performed at the same setting. Clinical data were collected prospectively. RESULTS: 1060 patients were imaged using mpMRI at our institution during the study period. 341 participants were then referred to the trial. 312 participants underwent MR/TRUS fusion biopsy of 452 lesions and were included in the analysis. 202 participants had biopsy-proven cancer (64.7%) and 206 (45.6%) lesions were positive for cancer. Distribution of cancer detected at each score produced a Gaussian distribution for SQS while PI-RADS demonstrates a negatively skewed curve with 82.1% of cases being scored as a 4 or 5. Patient-level data demonstrated AUC of 0.702 (95% CI 0.65 to 0.73) for PI-RADS and 0.762 (95% CI 0.72 to 0.81) for SQS (p< 0.0001) with respect to the detection of prostate cancer. The analysis for clinically significant prostate cancer at a per lesion level resulted in an AUC of 0.725 (95% CI 0.69 to 0.76) and 0.829 (95% CI 0.79 to 0.87) for the PI-RADS and SQS score, respectively (p< 0.0001). CONCLUSIONS: mpMRI is a useful tool in the workup of patients at risk for prostate cancer, and serves as a platform to guide further evaluation with MR/TRUS fusion biopsy. SQS score provided a more normal distribution of scores and yielded a higher AUC than PI-RADS v2. However until our findings are validated, we recommend reporting of detailed sequence-specific findings. This will allow for prospectively collected data to be utilized in determining the impact of ongoing changes to these scoring systems as our understanding of mpMRI interpretation evolves. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-4659614 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2015 |
publisher | Public Library of Science |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-46596142015-12-02 Comparison of Multiparametric MRI Scoring Systems and the Impact on Cancer Detection in Patients Undergoing MR US Fusion Guided Prostate Biopsies Rastinehad, Ardeshir R. Waingankar, Nikhil Turkbey, Baris Yaskiv, Oksana Sonstegard, Anna M. Fakhoury, Mathew Olsson, Carl A. Siegel, David N. Choyke, Peter L. Ben-Levi, Eran Villani, Robert PLoS One Research Article INTRODUCTION: Multiple scoring systems have been proposed for prostate MRI reporting. We sought to review the clinical impact of the new Prostate Imaging Reporting and Data System v2 (PI-RADS) and compare those results to our proposed Simplified Qualitative System (SQS) score with respect to detection of prostate cancers and clinically significant prostate cancers. METHODS: All patients who underwent multiparametric prostate MRI (mpMRI) had their images interpreted using PI-RADS v1 and SQS score. PI-RADS v2 was calculated from prospectively collected data points. Patients with positive mpMRIs were then referred by their urologists for enrollment in an IRB-approved prospective phase III trial of mpMRI-Ultrasound (MR/TRUS) fusion biopsy of suspicious lesions. Standard 12-core biopsy was performed at the same setting. Clinical data were collected prospectively. RESULTS: 1060 patients were imaged using mpMRI at our institution during the study period. 341 participants were then referred to the trial. 312 participants underwent MR/TRUS fusion biopsy of 452 lesions and were included in the analysis. 202 participants had biopsy-proven cancer (64.7%) and 206 (45.6%) lesions were positive for cancer. Distribution of cancer detected at each score produced a Gaussian distribution for SQS while PI-RADS demonstrates a negatively skewed curve with 82.1% of cases being scored as a 4 or 5. Patient-level data demonstrated AUC of 0.702 (95% CI 0.65 to 0.73) for PI-RADS and 0.762 (95% CI 0.72 to 0.81) for SQS (p< 0.0001) with respect to the detection of prostate cancer. The analysis for clinically significant prostate cancer at a per lesion level resulted in an AUC of 0.725 (95% CI 0.69 to 0.76) and 0.829 (95% CI 0.79 to 0.87) for the PI-RADS and SQS score, respectively (p< 0.0001). CONCLUSIONS: mpMRI is a useful tool in the workup of patients at risk for prostate cancer, and serves as a platform to guide further evaluation with MR/TRUS fusion biopsy. SQS score provided a more normal distribution of scores and yielded a higher AUC than PI-RADS v2. However until our findings are validated, we recommend reporting of detailed sequence-specific findings. This will allow for prospectively collected data to be utilized in determining the impact of ongoing changes to these scoring systems as our understanding of mpMRI interpretation evolves. Public Library of Science 2015-11-25 /pmc/articles/PMC4659614/ /pubmed/26605548 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0143404 Text en © 2015 Rastinehad et al http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are properly credited. |
spellingShingle | Research Article Rastinehad, Ardeshir R. Waingankar, Nikhil Turkbey, Baris Yaskiv, Oksana Sonstegard, Anna M. Fakhoury, Mathew Olsson, Carl A. Siegel, David N. Choyke, Peter L. Ben-Levi, Eran Villani, Robert Comparison of Multiparametric MRI Scoring Systems and the Impact on Cancer Detection in Patients Undergoing MR US Fusion Guided Prostate Biopsies |
title | Comparison of Multiparametric MRI Scoring Systems and the Impact on Cancer Detection in Patients Undergoing MR US Fusion Guided Prostate Biopsies |
title_full | Comparison of Multiparametric MRI Scoring Systems and the Impact on Cancer Detection in Patients Undergoing MR US Fusion Guided Prostate Biopsies |
title_fullStr | Comparison of Multiparametric MRI Scoring Systems and the Impact on Cancer Detection in Patients Undergoing MR US Fusion Guided Prostate Biopsies |
title_full_unstemmed | Comparison of Multiparametric MRI Scoring Systems and the Impact on Cancer Detection in Patients Undergoing MR US Fusion Guided Prostate Biopsies |
title_short | Comparison of Multiparametric MRI Scoring Systems and the Impact on Cancer Detection in Patients Undergoing MR US Fusion Guided Prostate Biopsies |
title_sort | comparison of multiparametric mri scoring systems and the impact on cancer detection in patients undergoing mr us fusion guided prostate biopsies |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4659614/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26605548 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0143404 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT rastinehadardeshirr comparisonofmultiparametricmriscoringsystemsandtheimpactoncancerdetectioninpatientsundergoingmrusfusionguidedprostatebiopsies AT waingankarnikhil comparisonofmultiparametricmriscoringsystemsandtheimpactoncancerdetectioninpatientsundergoingmrusfusionguidedprostatebiopsies AT turkbeybaris comparisonofmultiparametricmriscoringsystemsandtheimpactoncancerdetectioninpatientsundergoingmrusfusionguidedprostatebiopsies AT yaskivoksana comparisonofmultiparametricmriscoringsystemsandtheimpactoncancerdetectioninpatientsundergoingmrusfusionguidedprostatebiopsies AT sonstegardannam comparisonofmultiparametricmriscoringsystemsandtheimpactoncancerdetectioninpatientsundergoingmrusfusionguidedprostatebiopsies AT fakhourymathew comparisonofmultiparametricmriscoringsystemsandtheimpactoncancerdetectioninpatientsundergoingmrusfusionguidedprostatebiopsies AT olssoncarla comparisonofmultiparametricmriscoringsystemsandtheimpactoncancerdetectioninpatientsundergoingmrusfusionguidedprostatebiopsies AT siegeldavidn comparisonofmultiparametricmriscoringsystemsandtheimpactoncancerdetectioninpatientsundergoingmrusfusionguidedprostatebiopsies AT choykepeterl comparisonofmultiparametricmriscoringsystemsandtheimpactoncancerdetectioninpatientsundergoingmrusfusionguidedprostatebiopsies AT benlevieran comparisonofmultiparametricmriscoringsystemsandtheimpactoncancerdetectioninpatientsundergoingmrusfusionguidedprostatebiopsies AT villanirobert comparisonofmultiparametricmriscoringsystemsandtheimpactoncancerdetectioninpatientsundergoingmrusfusionguidedprostatebiopsies |