Cargando…

The core outcome measures in effectiveness trials (COMET) initiative: five years on

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales:	Williamson, Paula, Altman, Douglas, Blazeby, Jane, Clarke, Michael, Gargon, Elizabeth, Gorst, Sarah, Tunis, Sean
Formato:	Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:	English
Publicado:	BioMed Central 2015
Materias:	Poster Presentation
Acceso en línea:	https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4660082/ http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1745-6215-16-S2-P69

Ejemplares similares

The COMET (Core Outcome Measures in Effectiveness Trials) Initiative
por: Williamson, Paula R, et al.
Publicado: (2011)

COMET V meeting summary
por: Gorst, Sarah L, et al.
Publicado: (2015)

The COMET Initiative database: progress and activities update (2015)
por: Gargon, E., et al.
Publicado: (2017)

The COMET Initiative database: progress and activities from 2011 to 2013
por: Gargon, Elizabeth, et al.
Publicado: (2014)

The COMET initiative database: progress and activities update (2014)
por: Gargon, Elizabeth, et al.
Publicado: (2015)

COMET IV meeting summary
por: Gargon, Elizabeth, et al.
Publicado: (2015)

Collating the knowledge base for the COMET (core outcome measures in effectiveness trials) initiative - a systematic review
por: Gargon, Elizabeth, et al.
Publicado: (2013)

Core Outcome Set–STAndards for Reporting: The COS-STAR Statement
por: Kirkham, Jamie J., et al.
Publicado: (2016)

Core Outcome Set-STAndardised Protocol Items: the COS-STAP Statement
por: Kirkham, Jamie J., et al.
Publicado: (2019)

COS-STAR: a reporting guideline for studies developing core outcome sets (protocol)
por: Kirkham, Jamie J., et al.
Publicado: (2015)

Choosing important health outcomes for comparative effectiveness research: An updated systematic review and involvement of low and middle income countries
por: Davis, Katherine, et al.
Publicado: (2018)

Choosing important health outcomes for comparative effectiveness research: an updated review and user survey
por: Gorst, Sarah L, et al.
Publicado: (2015)

The COMET Handbook: version 1.0
por: Williamson, Paula R., et al.
Publicado: (2017)

Choosing Important Health Outcomes for Comparative Effectiveness Research: An Updated Review and User Survey
por: Gorst, Sarah L., et al.
Publicado: (2016)

The Patient and Public Involvement Activities of the COMET Initiative
por: Bagley, Heather, et al.
Publicado: (2015)

The comet initiative
por: Williamson, Paula
Publicado: (2013)

A mixed methods study of researchers’ experiences of developing core outcome sets
por: Gargon, Elizabeth, et al.
Publicado: (2015)

Developing core outcome sets for clinical trials: issues to consider
por: Williamson, Paula R, et al.
Publicado: (2012)

Core Outcome Set-STAndards for Development: The COS-STAD recommendations
por: Kirkham, Jamie J., et al.
Publicado: (2017)

Choosing important health outcomes for comparative effectiveness research: 5th annual update to a systematic review of core outcome sets for research
por: Gargon, Elizabeth, et al.
Publicado: (2019)

Evaluation of an automatic article selection method for timelier updates of the Comet Core Outcome Set database
por: Norman, Christopher R, et al.
Publicado: (2019)

A survey of core outcome set developers
por: Gargon, Elizabeth, et al.
Publicado: (2015)

Choosing important health outcomes for comparative effectiveness research: 6(th) annual update to a systematic review of core outcome sets for research
por: Gargon, Elizabeth, et al.
Publicado: (2021)

Three nested RCTs of dual or single stakeholder feedback within Delphi surveys during core outcome and information set development
por: Brookes, Sara, et al.
Publicado: (2015)

Core outcome set development: the effect of Delphi panel composition and feedback on prioritisation of outcomes
por: Macefield, Rhiannon, et al.
Publicado: (2013)

Inclusion of participants from low-income and middle-income countries in core outcome sets development: a systematic review
por: Karumbi, Jamlick, et al.
Publicado: (2021)

Choosing Important Health Outcomes for Comparative Effectiveness Research: An Updated Review and Identification of Gaps
por: Gorst, Sarah L., et al.
Publicado: (2016)

Choosing Important Health Outcomes for Comparative Effectiveness Research: A Systematic Review
por: Gargon, Elizabeth, et al.
Publicado: (2014)

Choosing important health outcomes for comparative effectiveness research: 4th annual update to a systematic review of core outcome sets for research
por: Gargon, Elizabeth, et al.
Publicado: (2018)

Core outcomes for randomized trials and core information for clinical decision-making: implications for outcome selection
por: McNair, Angus, et al.
Publicado: (2015)

Pragmatic approaches to mitigating missing data and research priorities to assess the effectiveness of interventions
por: Kearney, Anna, et al.
Publicado: (2015)

A review of the description of patient withdrawal in trial protocols and patient information sheets (PIS)
por: Kearney, Anna, et al.
Publicado: (2015)

“To have, to hold, from this day forward”: understanding current practice regarding the retention of trial participants
por: Daykin, Anne, et al.
Publicado: (2015)

Citation analysis: a new approach to assess the uptake of core outcome sets
por: Barnes, Karen, et al.
Publicado: (2015)

Collating the knowledge base for core outcome set development: developing and appraising the search strategy for a systematic review
por: Gargon, Elizabeth, et al.
Publicado: (2015)

Feasibility of establishing a central repository for the individual participant data from research studies
por: Smith, Catrin Tudur, et al.
Publicado: (2011)

Reported reasons for missing data and the interplay with trial setting
por: Kearney, Anna, et al.
Publicado: (2015)

Towards core outcome set (COS) development: a follow-up descriptive survey of outcomes in Cochrane reviews
por: Wuytack, Francesca, et al.
Publicado: (2015)

Optimising the design of internal pilot work to inform efficient randomised controlled trials: issues to consider when developing progression criteria
por: Avery, Kerry, et al.
Publicado: (2015)

Can a core outcome set improve the quality of systematic reviews? – a survey of the Co-ordinating Editors of Cochrane review groups
por: Kirkham, Jamie J, et al.
Publicado: (2013)

Cannot write session to /tmp/vufind_sessions/sess_4r45pdpnd2lrcael5cn6vc3qjv