Cargando…

Does ‘mapping’ the evidence usefully inform the research question prioritisation process in systematic reviews?

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Main, Caroline, Wilson, Jayne, English, Martin, Kearns, Pamela, Phillips, Bob, Pizer, Barry, Wilne, Sophie, Wheatley, Keith
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2015
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4660331/
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1745-6215-16-S2-P170
_version_ 1782402778933493760
author Main, Caroline
Wilson, Jayne
English, Martin
Kearns, Pamela
Phillips, Bob
Pizer, Barry
Wilne, Sophie
Wheatley, Keith
author_facet Main, Caroline
Wilson, Jayne
English, Martin
Kearns, Pamela
Phillips, Bob
Pizer, Barry
Wilne, Sophie
Wheatley, Keith
author_sort Main, Caroline
collection PubMed
description
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4660331
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2015
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-46603312015-12-02 Does ‘mapping’ the evidence usefully inform the research question prioritisation process in systematic reviews? Main, Caroline Wilson, Jayne English, Martin Kearns, Pamela Phillips, Bob Pizer, Barry Wilne, Sophie Wheatley, Keith Trials Poster Presentation BioMed Central 2015-11-16 /pmc/articles/PMC4660331/ http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1745-6215-16-S2-P170 Text en Copyright © 2015 Main et al. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Poster Presentation
Main, Caroline
Wilson, Jayne
English, Martin
Kearns, Pamela
Phillips, Bob
Pizer, Barry
Wilne, Sophie
Wheatley, Keith
Does ‘mapping’ the evidence usefully inform the research question prioritisation process in systematic reviews?
title Does ‘mapping’ the evidence usefully inform the research question prioritisation process in systematic reviews?
title_full Does ‘mapping’ the evidence usefully inform the research question prioritisation process in systematic reviews?
title_fullStr Does ‘mapping’ the evidence usefully inform the research question prioritisation process in systematic reviews?
title_full_unstemmed Does ‘mapping’ the evidence usefully inform the research question prioritisation process in systematic reviews?
title_short Does ‘mapping’ the evidence usefully inform the research question prioritisation process in systematic reviews?
title_sort does ‘mapping’ the evidence usefully inform the research question prioritisation process in systematic reviews?
topic Poster Presentation
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4660331/
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1745-6215-16-S2-P170
work_keys_str_mv AT maincaroline doesmappingtheevidenceusefullyinformtheresearchquestionprioritisationprocessinsystematicreviews
AT wilsonjayne doesmappingtheevidenceusefullyinformtheresearchquestionprioritisationprocessinsystematicreviews
AT englishmartin doesmappingtheevidenceusefullyinformtheresearchquestionprioritisationprocessinsystematicreviews
AT kearnspamela doesmappingtheevidenceusefullyinformtheresearchquestionprioritisationprocessinsystematicreviews
AT phillipsbob doesmappingtheevidenceusefullyinformtheresearchquestionprioritisationprocessinsystematicreviews
AT pizerbarry doesmappingtheevidenceusefullyinformtheresearchquestionprioritisationprocessinsystematicreviews
AT wilnesophie doesmappingtheevidenceusefullyinformtheresearchquestionprioritisationprocessinsystematicreviews
AT wheatleykeith doesmappingtheevidenceusefullyinformtheresearchquestionprioritisationprocessinsystematicreviews