Cargando…
Does ‘mapping’ the evidence usefully inform the research question prioritisation process in systematic reviews?
Autores principales: | Main, Caroline, Wilson, Jayne, English, Martin, Kearns, Pamela, Phillips, Bob, Pizer, Barry, Wilne, Sophie, Wheatley, Keith |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2015
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4660331/ http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1745-6215-16-S2-P170 |
Ejemplares similares
-
The role of high-dose myeloablative chemotherapy with haematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT) in children with central nervous system (CNS) tumours: protocol for a systematic review and meta-analysis
por: Main, Caroline, et al.
Publicado: (2015) -
The impact of routine surveillance screening with magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) to detect tumour recurrence in children with central nervous system (CNS) tumours: protocol for a systematic review and meta-analysis
por: Main, Caroline, et al.
Publicado: (2016) -
The utility of routine surveillance screening with magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) to detect tumour recurrence in children with low-grade central nervous system (CNS) tumours: a systematic review
por: Stevens, Simon P., et al.
Publicado: (2018) -
The effectiveness and safety of proton beam radiation therapy in children with malignant central nervous system (CNS) tumours: protocol for a systematic review
por: Main, Caroline, et al.
Publicado: (2016) -
Comparison of anticipated and actual control group outcomes in randomised trials in paediatric oncology provides evidence that historically controlled studies are biased in favour of the novel treatment
por: Moroz, Veronica, et al.
Publicado: (2014)