Cargando…

The distribution of cervical vertebrae anomalies among dental malocclusions

AIMS: The aims of our study were to investigate the distribution of cervical vertebrae anomalies (CVAs) among dental Angle Class I, II, and III malocclusions in Turkish population and whether a correlation between CVA and dental malocclusion. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The study was performed on lateral...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Kamak, Hasan, Yildırım, Eren
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd 2015
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4660490/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26692691
http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/0974-8237.167857
_version_ 1782402811589296128
author Kamak, Hasan
Yildırım, Eren
author_facet Kamak, Hasan
Yildırım, Eren
author_sort Kamak, Hasan
collection PubMed
description AIMS: The aims of our study were to investigate the distribution of cervical vertebrae anomalies (CVAs) among dental Angle Class I, II, and III malocclusions in Turkish population and whether a correlation between CVA and dental malocclusion. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The study was performed on lateral cephalometric radiographs which were taken at the Department of Orthodontics, Faculty of Dentistry, Kirikkale University. The final sample of 318 orthodontic patients was included in the study. Dental malocclusions were performed according to Angle classification. CVAs were categorized: (1) fusion and (2) posterior arch deficiency (PAD). The Chi-square test was used to the analysis of the potential differences among dental malocclusions. RESULTS: The final sample of 318 patients was examined. CVA was observed in 42 individuals (of 26 [8.17%] had fusion and 16 [5.03%] had PAD), with a frequency of 13.2%. Of the 26 fusion defect, 8 (30.7%) had Angle Class I, 8 (30.7%) had Angle Class II, and 10 (38.4%) had Angle Class III malocclusion. Of the 16 PAD, 8 (50%) had Angle Class I, 8 (50%) had Angle Class II but no patients with Angle Class III malocclusion was observed. The distribution of dental malocclusions regarding CVA was not statistically significant (P = 0.076). Of these 42 individuals with CVA, 52.3% (15 fusions and 7 PAD) were females and 47.7% (11 fusions and 9 PAD) were males. CONCLUSION: In our study, the prevalence of fusion and PAD were found 8.1% and 5.0% in Turkish population, respectively. Besides, no statistically significant correlation between CVA and Angle Class I, II, and III malocclusions were found. Our findings support the studies showing no gender dimorphism.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4660490
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2015
publisher Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-46604902015-12-11 The distribution of cervical vertebrae anomalies among dental malocclusions Kamak, Hasan Yildırım, Eren J Craniovertebr Junction Spine Original Article AIMS: The aims of our study were to investigate the distribution of cervical vertebrae anomalies (CVAs) among dental Angle Class I, II, and III malocclusions in Turkish population and whether a correlation between CVA and dental malocclusion. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The study was performed on lateral cephalometric radiographs which were taken at the Department of Orthodontics, Faculty of Dentistry, Kirikkale University. The final sample of 318 orthodontic patients was included in the study. Dental malocclusions were performed according to Angle classification. CVAs were categorized: (1) fusion and (2) posterior arch deficiency (PAD). The Chi-square test was used to the analysis of the potential differences among dental malocclusions. RESULTS: The final sample of 318 patients was examined. CVA was observed in 42 individuals (of 26 [8.17%] had fusion and 16 [5.03%] had PAD), with a frequency of 13.2%. Of the 26 fusion defect, 8 (30.7%) had Angle Class I, 8 (30.7%) had Angle Class II, and 10 (38.4%) had Angle Class III malocclusion. Of the 16 PAD, 8 (50%) had Angle Class I, 8 (50%) had Angle Class II but no patients with Angle Class III malocclusion was observed. The distribution of dental malocclusions regarding CVA was not statistically significant (P = 0.076). Of these 42 individuals with CVA, 52.3% (15 fusions and 7 PAD) were females and 47.7% (11 fusions and 9 PAD) were males. CONCLUSION: In our study, the prevalence of fusion and PAD were found 8.1% and 5.0% in Turkish population, respectively. Besides, no statistically significant correlation between CVA and Angle Class I, II, and III malocclusions were found. Our findings support the studies showing no gender dimorphism. Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd 2015 /pmc/articles/PMC4660490/ /pubmed/26692691 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/0974-8237.167857 Text en Copyright: © Journal of Craniovertebral Junction and Spine http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/3.0 This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 3.0 License, which allows others to remix, tweak, and build upon the work non-commercially, as long as the author is credited and the new creations are licensed under the identical terms.
spellingShingle Original Article
Kamak, Hasan
Yildırım, Eren
The distribution of cervical vertebrae anomalies among dental malocclusions
title The distribution of cervical vertebrae anomalies among dental malocclusions
title_full The distribution of cervical vertebrae anomalies among dental malocclusions
title_fullStr The distribution of cervical vertebrae anomalies among dental malocclusions
title_full_unstemmed The distribution of cervical vertebrae anomalies among dental malocclusions
title_short The distribution of cervical vertebrae anomalies among dental malocclusions
title_sort distribution of cervical vertebrae anomalies among dental malocclusions
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4660490/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26692691
http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/0974-8237.167857
work_keys_str_mv AT kamakhasan thedistributionofcervicalvertebraeanomaliesamongdentalmalocclusions
AT yildırımeren thedistributionofcervicalvertebraeanomaliesamongdentalmalocclusions
AT kamakhasan distributionofcervicalvertebraeanomaliesamongdentalmalocclusions
AT yildırımeren distributionofcervicalvertebraeanomaliesamongdentalmalocclusions