Cargando…

“NIMS technique” for minimally invasive spinal fixation using non-fenestrated pedicle screws: A technical note

STUDY DESIGN: Case series. OBJECTIVE: To reduce the cost of minimally invasive spinal fixation. BACKGROUND: Minimally invasive spine (MIS) surgery is an upcoming modality of managing a multitude of spinal pathologies. However, in a resource-limited situations, using fenestrated screws (FSs) may prov...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Rajesh, Alugolu, Pelluru, Pavan Kumar, Kumar, Ashish
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd 2015
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4660491/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26692692
http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/0974-8237.167858
_version_ 1782402811815788544
author Rajesh, Alugolu
Pelluru, Pavan Kumar
Kumar, Ashish
author_facet Rajesh, Alugolu
Pelluru, Pavan Kumar
Kumar, Ashish
author_sort Rajesh, Alugolu
collection PubMed
description STUDY DESIGN: Case series. OBJECTIVE: To reduce the cost of minimally invasive spinal fixation. BACKGROUND: Minimally invasive spine (MIS) surgery is an upcoming modality of managing a multitude of spinal pathologies. However, in a resource-limited situations, using fenestrated screws (FSs) may prove very costly for patients with poor affordability. We here in describe the Nizam's Institute of Medical Sciences (NIMS) experience of using routine non-FSs (NFSs) for transpedicular fixation by the minimally invasive way to bridge the economic gap. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A total of 7 patients underwent NFS-minimally invasive spine (MIS) surgery. Male to female distribution was 6:1. The average blood loss was 50 ml and the mean operating time was 2 and 1/2 h. All patients were mobilized the very next day after confirming the position of implants on X-ray/computed tomography. RESULTS: All 7 patients are doing well in follow-up with no complaints of a backache or fresh neurological deficits. There was no case with pedicle breach or screw pullout. The average cost of a single level fixation by FS and NFS was ₹1, 30,000/patient and ₹32,000/patient respectively (‘2166 and ‘530, respectively). At the end of 1-year follow-up, we had two cases of screw cap loosening and with a displacement of the rod cranio-caudally in one case which was revised through the same incisions. CONCLUSIONS: Transpedicular fixation by using NFS for thoracolumbar spinal pathologies is a cost-effective extension of MIS surgery. This may extend the benefits to a lower socioeconomic group who cannot afford the cost of fenestrated screw (FS).
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4660491
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2015
publisher Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-46604912015-12-11 “NIMS technique” for minimally invasive spinal fixation using non-fenestrated pedicle screws: A technical note Rajesh, Alugolu Pelluru, Pavan Kumar Kumar, Ashish J Craniovertebr Junction Spine Original Article STUDY DESIGN: Case series. OBJECTIVE: To reduce the cost of minimally invasive spinal fixation. BACKGROUND: Minimally invasive spine (MIS) surgery is an upcoming modality of managing a multitude of spinal pathologies. However, in a resource-limited situations, using fenestrated screws (FSs) may prove very costly for patients with poor affordability. We here in describe the Nizam's Institute of Medical Sciences (NIMS) experience of using routine non-FSs (NFSs) for transpedicular fixation by the minimally invasive way to bridge the economic gap. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A total of 7 patients underwent NFS-minimally invasive spine (MIS) surgery. Male to female distribution was 6:1. The average blood loss was 50 ml and the mean operating time was 2 and 1/2 h. All patients were mobilized the very next day after confirming the position of implants on X-ray/computed tomography. RESULTS: All 7 patients are doing well in follow-up with no complaints of a backache or fresh neurological deficits. There was no case with pedicle breach or screw pullout. The average cost of a single level fixation by FS and NFS was ₹1, 30,000/patient and ₹32,000/patient respectively (‘2166 and ‘530, respectively). At the end of 1-year follow-up, we had two cases of screw cap loosening and with a displacement of the rod cranio-caudally in one case which was revised through the same incisions. CONCLUSIONS: Transpedicular fixation by using NFS for thoracolumbar spinal pathologies is a cost-effective extension of MIS surgery. This may extend the benefits to a lower socioeconomic group who cannot afford the cost of fenestrated screw (FS). Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd 2015 /pmc/articles/PMC4660491/ /pubmed/26692692 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/0974-8237.167858 Text en Copyright: © Journal of Craniovertebral Junction and Spine http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/3.0 This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 3.0 License, which allows others to remix, tweak, and build upon the work non-commercially, as long as the author is credited and the new creations are licensed under the identical terms.
spellingShingle Original Article
Rajesh, Alugolu
Pelluru, Pavan Kumar
Kumar, Ashish
“NIMS technique” for minimally invasive spinal fixation using non-fenestrated pedicle screws: A technical note
title “NIMS technique” for minimally invasive spinal fixation using non-fenestrated pedicle screws: A technical note
title_full “NIMS technique” for minimally invasive spinal fixation using non-fenestrated pedicle screws: A technical note
title_fullStr “NIMS technique” for minimally invasive spinal fixation using non-fenestrated pedicle screws: A technical note
title_full_unstemmed “NIMS technique” for minimally invasive spinal fixation using non-fenestrated pedicle screws: A technical note
title_short “NIMS technique” for minimally invasive spinal fixation using non-fenestrated pedicle screws: A technical note
title_sort “nims technique” for minimally invasive spinal fixation using non-fenestrated pedicle screws: a technical note
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4660491/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26692692
http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/0974-8237.167858
work_keys_str_mv AT rajeshalugolu nimstechniqueforminimallyinvasivespinalfixationusingnonfenestratedpediclescrewsatechnicalnote
AT pellurupavankumar nimstechniqueforminimallyinvasivespinalfixationusingnonfenestratedpediclescrewsatechnicalnote
AT kumarashish nimstechniqueforminimallyinvasivespinalfixationusingnonfenestratedpediclescrewsatechnicalnote