Cargando…
“NIMS technique” for minimally invasive spinal fixation using non-fenestrated pedicle screws: A technical note
STUDY DESIGN: Case series. OBJECTIVE: To reduce the cost of minimally invasive spinal fixation. BACKGROUND: Minimally invasive spine (MIS) surgery is an upcoming modality of managing a multitude of spinal pathologies. However, in a resource-limited situations, using fenestrated screws (FSs) may prov...
Autores principales: | , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd
2015
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4660491/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26692692 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/0974-8237.167858 |
_version_ | 1782402811815788544 |
---|---|
author | Rajesh, Alugolu Pelluru, Pavan Kumar Kumar, Ashish |
author_facet | Rajesh, Alugolu Pelluru, Pavan Kumar Kumar, Ashish |
author_sort | Rajesh, Alugolu |
collection | PubMed |
description | STUDY DESIGN: Case series. OBJECTIVE: To reduce the cost of minimally invasive spinal fixation. BACKGROUND: Minimally invasive spine (MIS) surgery is an upcoming modality of managing a multitude of spinal pathologies. However, in a resource-limited situations, using fenestrated screws (FSs) may prove very costly for patients with poor affordability. We here in describe the Nizam's Institute of Medical Sciences (NIMS) experience of using routine non-FSs (NFSs) for transpedicular fixation by the minimally invasive way to bridge the economic gap. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A total of 7 patients underwent NFS-minimally invasive spine (MIS) surgery. Male to female distribution was 6:1. The average blood loss was 50 ml and the mean operating time was 2 and 1/2 h. All patients were mobilized the very next day after confirming the position of implants on X-ray/computed tomography. RESULTS: All 7 patients are doing well in follow-up with no complaints of a backache or fresh neurological deficits. There was no case with pedicle breach or screw pullout. The average cost of a single level fixation by FS and NFS was ₹1, 30,000/patient and ₹32,000/patient respectively (‘2166 and ‘530, respectively). At the end of 1-year follow-up, we had two cases of screw cap loosening and with a displacement of the rod cranio-caudally in one case which was revised through the same incisions. CONCLUSIONS: Transpedicular fixation by using NFS for thoracolumbar spinal pathologies is a cost-effective extension of MIS surgery. This may extend the benefits to a lower socioeconomic group who cannot afford the cost of fenestrated screw (FS). |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-4660491 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2015 |
publisher | Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-46604912015-12-11 “NIMS technique” for minimally invasive spinal fixation using non-fenestrated pedicle screws: A technical note Rajesh, Alugolu Pelluru, Pavan Kumar Kumar, Ashish J Craniovertebr Junction Spine Original Article STUDY DESIGN: Case series. OBJECTIVE: To reduce the cost of minimally invasive spinal fixation. BACKGROUND: Minimally invasive spine (MIS) surgery is an upcoming modality of managing a multitude of spinal pathologies. However, in a resource-limited situations, using fenestrated screws (FSs) may prove very costly for patients with poor affordability. We here in describe the Nizam's Institute of Medical Sciences (NIMS) experience of using routine non-FSs (NFSs) for transpedicular fixation by the minimally invasive way to bridge the economic gap. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A total of 7 patients underwent NFS-minimally invasive spine (MIS) surgery. Male to female distribution was 6:1. The average blood loss was 50 ml and the mean operating time was 2 and 1/2 h. All patients were mobilized the very next day after confirming the position of implants on X-ray/computed tomography. RESULTS: All 7 patients are doing well in follow-up with no complaints of a backache or fresh neurological deficits. There was no case with pedicle breach or screw pullout. The average cost of a single level fixation by FS and NFS was ₹1, 30,000/patient and ₹32,000/patient respectively (‘2166 and ‘530, respectively). At the end of 1-year follow-up, we had two cases of screw cap loosening and with a displacement of the rod cranio-caudally in one case which was revised through the same incisions. CONCLUSIONS: Transpedicular fixation by using NFS for thoracolumbar spinal pathologies is a cost-effective extension of MIS surgery. This may extend the benefits to a lower socioeconomic group who cannot afford the cost of fenestrated screw (FS). Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd 2015 /pmc/articles/PMC4660491/ /pubmed/26692692 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/0974-8237.167858 Text en Copyright: © Journal of Craniovertebral Junction and Spine http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/3.0 This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 3.0 License, which allows others to remix, tweak, and build upon the work non-commercially, as long as the author is credited and the new creations are licensed under the identical terms. |
spellingShingle | Original Article Rajesh, Alugolu Pelluru, Pavan Kumar Kumar, Ashish “NIMS technique” for minimally invasive spinal fixation using non-fenestrated pedicle screws: A technical note |
title | “NIMS technique” for minimally invasive spinal fixation using non-fenestrated pedicle screws: A technical note |
title_full | “NIMS technique” for minimally invasive spinal fixation using non-fenestrated pedicle screws: A technical note |
title_fullStr | “NIMS technique” for minimally invasive spinal fixation using non-fenestrated pedicle screws: A technical note |
title_full_unstemmed | “NIMS technique” for minimally invasive spinal fixation using non-fenestrated pedicle screws: A technical note |
title_short | “NIMS technique” for minimally invasive spinal fixation using non-fenestrated pedicle screws: A technical note |
title_sort | “nims technique” for minimally invasive spinal fixation using non-fenestrated pedicle screws: a technical note |
topic | Original Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4660491/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26692692 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/0974-8237.167858 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT rajeshalugolu nimstechniqueforminimallyinvasivespinalfixationusingnonfenestratedpediclescrewsatechnicalnote AT pellurupavankumar nimstechniqueforminimallyinvasivespinalfixationusingnonfenestratedpediclescrewsatechnicalnote AT kumarashish nimstechniqueforminimallyinvasivespinalfixationusingnonfenestratedpediclescrewsatechnicalnote |